Skip to main content
PMC home page
The Journal of Experimental Medicine logoLink to The Journal of Experimental Medicine
. 1975 Dec 1;142(6):1591–1599. doi: 10.1084/jem.142.6.1591

Synergistic and suppressive interactions among mouse T lymphocytes in the response to phytohemagglutinin

PMCID: PMC2190077  PMID: 1081581

Abstract

A synergistic effect in the proliferative response to phytohemagglutinin (PHA) can be observed in cultures containing a mixture of mouse CBA/Ca lymph node cells (LNC) and syngeneic CBA/T6T6 thymocytes (ThC) when compared to cultures containing only one cell type. This effect was analyzed, at various days of culture and in LNC- ThC mixtures of different ratios, by comparing the origin of the cells in mitosis (detected by caryotypic analysis), the stimulation of DNA synthesis, the number of blasts, and the percentage of blasts labeled after pulses of [3H]thymidine (detected by autoradiography). The following conclusions were reached: (a) ThC are induced to proliferate by the presence of LNC, while they are almost unresponsive to PHA when cultured alone; and (b) the strongest "synergistic" effect is exerted on LNC, whose proliferation is markedly enhanced. Evidence is presented that this last effect is not specific to the presence of ThC, but results from a dilution of LNC which retards the time when the culture reaches a critical concentration of blasts, above which proliferation progressively stops. Thus, conditions of culture allowing the response to PHA of a low concentration of LNC leads to the most prolonged T-cell proliferation. These observations may be relevant to the types of T- cell interactions, "synergistic" or "suppressive," occurring during in vitro or in vivo immune responses.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (564.7 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Cantor H., Simpson E. Regulation of the immune response by subclasses of T lymphocytes. I. Interactions between pre-killer T cells and regulatory T cells obtained from peripheral lymphoid tissues of mice. Eur J Immunol. 1975 May;5(5):330–336. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830050508. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Chen C., Hirsch J. G. The effects of mercaptoethanol and of peritoneal macrophages on the antibody-forming capacity of nonadherent mouse spleen cells in vitro. J Exp Med. 1972 Sep 1;136(3):604–617. doi: 10.1084/jem.136.3.604. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Click R. E., Benck L., Alter B. J. Immune responses in vitro. I. Culture conditions for antibody synthesis. Cell Immunol. 1972 Feb;3(2):264–276. doi: 10.1016/0008-8749(72)90165-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cohen L., Howe M. L. Synergism between subpopulations of thymus-derived cells mediating the proliferative and effector phases of the mixed lymphocyte reaction. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1973 Sep;70(9):2707–2710. doi: 10.1073/pnas.70.9.2707. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Gery I., Waksman B. H. Potentiation of the T-lymphocyte response to mitogens. II. The cellular source of potentiating mediator(s). J Exp Med. 1972 Jul 1;136(1):143–155. doi: 10.1084/jem.136.1.143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hodes R. J., Handwerger B. S., Terry W. D. Synergy between subpopulations of mouse spleen cells in the in vitro generation of cell-mediated cytotoxicity: evidence for the involvement of a non-T cell. J Exp Med. 1974 Dec 1;140(6):1646–1659. doi: 10.1084/jem.140.6.1646. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Häyry P., Andersson L. C., Nordling S., Virolainen M. Allograft response in vitro. Transplant Rev. 1972;12:91–140. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065x.1972.tb00054.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Häyry P., Andersson L. C. T cell synergy in mixed lymphocyte culture-induced cytolysis. Eur J Immunol. 1974 Feb;4(2):145–147. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830040215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Jacobsson H., Blomgren H. Release of mitogenic factor by mouse lymph node cells stimulated with PHA in vitro. Inhibition of this phenomenon by the addition of thymocytes. J Immunol. 1975 May;114(5):1623–1630. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. MOORHEAD P. S., NOWELL P. C. CHROMOSOME CYTOLOGY. Methods Med Res. 1964;10:310–322. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Oppenheim J. J., Leventhal B. G., Hersh E. M. The transformation of column-purified lymphocytes with nonspecific and specific antigenic stimuli. J Immunol. 1968 Aug;101(2):262–267. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Peavy D. L., Pierce C. W. Cell-mediated immune responses in vitro. I. Suppression of the generation of cytotoxic lymphocytes by concanavalin A and concanavalin A-activated spleen cells. J Exp Med. 1974 Aug 1;140(2):356–369. doi: 10.1084/jem.140.2.356. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Piguet P. F., Vassalli P. Study of the thymic-derived or -independent nature of mouse spleen cells induced to proliferate in culture by various mitogens and antigens. Eur J Immunol. 1973 Aug;3(8):477–483. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830030805. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Raidt D. J., Mishell R. I., Dutton R. W. Cellular events in the immune response : analysis and in vitro response of mouse spleen cell populations separated by differential flotation in albumin gradients. J Exp Med. 1968 Oct 1;128(4):681–698. doi: 10.1084/jem.128.4.681. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Sauser D., Anckers C., Bron C. Isolation of mouse thymus-derived lymphocyte specific surface antigens. J Immunol. 1974 Aug;113(2):617–624. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Stewart C. C., Cramer S. F., Steward P. G. The response of human peripheral blood lymphocytes to phytohemagglutinin: determination of cell numbers. Cell Immunol. 1975 Apr;16(2):237–250. doi: 10.1016/0008-8749(75)90115-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Stobo J. D. Phytohemagglutin and concanavalin A: probes for murine 'T' cell activivation and differentiation. Transplant Rev. 1972;11:60–86. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065x.1972.tb00046.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Tardieu M., Fradet Y., Daguillard F. Immunological activities of rat lymphocytes. II. Isolation of suppressor cells of the mitogenic response of rat thoracic duct lymphocytes. Cell Immunol. 1975 May;17(1):123–130. doi: 10.1016/s0008-8749(75)80012-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Tittor W., Gerbase-Delima M., Walford R. L. Synergy among responding lymphoid cells in the one-way mixed lymphocyte reaction. Interaction between two types of thymus-dependent cells. J Exp Med. 1974 Jun 1;139(6):1488–1498. doi: 10.1084/jem.139.6.1488. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Wagner H. Synergy during in vitro cytotoxic allograft responses. I. Evidence for cell interaction between thymocytes and peripheral T cells. J Exp Med. 1973 Dec 1;138(6):1379–1397. doi: 10.1084/jem.138.6.1379. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Yachnin S., Allen L. W., Baron J. M., Svenson R. H. The potentiation of phytohemagglutinin-induced lymphocyte transformation by cell-cell interaction; a matrix hypothesis. Cell Immunol. 1972 Apr;3(4):569–589. doi: 10.1016/0008-8749(72)90120-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Experimental Medicine are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES