Skip to main content
The Journal of Experimental Medicine logoLink to The Journal of Experimental Medicine
. 1976 Jun 1;143(6):1327–1340. doi: 10.1084/jem.143.6.1327

In vitro tolerance induction of neonatal murine B cells

PMCID: PMC2190216  PMID: 58052

Abstract

The susceptibility of neonatal and adult B lymphocytes to tolerance induction was analyzed by a modification of the in vitro splenic focus technique. This technique permits stimulation of individual hapten- specific clonal precursor cells from both neonatal and adult donors. Neonatal or adult BALB/c spleen cells were adoptively transferred into irradiated, syngeneic, adult recipients which had been carrier-primed to hemocyanin (Hy), thus maximizing stimulation to the hapten 2,4- dinitrophenyl coupled by Hy (DNP-Hy). Cultures were initially treated with DNP on several heterologous (non-Hy) carriers and subsequently stimulated with DNP-Hy. Whereas the responsiveness of adult B cells was not diminished by pretreatment with any DNP conjugate, the majority of the neonatal B-cell response was abolished by in vitro culture with all of the DNP-protein conjugates. During the 1st wk of life, the ability to tolerize neonatal splenic B cells progressively decreased. Thus, tolerance in this system is: (a) restricted to B cells early in development; (b) established by both tolerogens and immunogens; (c) achieved at low (10(-9) M determinant) antigen concentrations; and (d) highly specific, discriminating between DNP- and TNP-specific B cells. We conclude that: (a) B lymphocytes, during their development, mature through a stage in which they are extremely susceptible to tolerogenesis; (b) the specific interaction of B-cell antigen receptors with multivalent antigens, while irrelevant to mature B cells, is tolerogenic to neonatal (immature) B cells unless antigen is concomitantly recognized by primed T cells; and (c) differences in the susceptibility of immature and mature B lymphocytes to tolerance induction suggest intrinsic differences between neonatal and adult B cells and may provide a physiologically relevant model for the study of tolerance to self-antigens.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.2 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. A DISCUSSION on immunological tolerance. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1956 Nov 13;146(922):1–92. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Basten A., Miller J. F., Sprent J., Cheers C. Cell-to-cell interaction in the immune response. X. T-cell-dependent suppression in tolerant mice. J Exp Med. 1974 Jul 1;140(1):199–217. doi: 10.1084/jem.140.1.199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Benjamin D. C. Evidence for specific suppression in the maintenance of immunologic tolerance. J Exp Med. 1975 Mar 1;141(3):635–646. doi: 10.1084/jem.141.3.635. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Borel Y., Kilham L., Schwartz R. S. Carrier-determined tolerance in various strains of mice: the role of isogenic IgG in the induction of hapten specific tolerance. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1974 Feb;145(2):470–474. doi: 10.3181/00379727-145-37833. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bretscher P., Cohn M. A theory of self-nonself discrimination. Science. 1970 Sep 11;169(3950):1042–1049. doi: 10.1126/science.169.3950.1042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Chiller J. M., Habicht G. S., Weigle W. O. Cellular sites of immunologic unresponsiveness. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1970 Mar;65(3):551–556. doi: 10.1073/pnas.65.3.551. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Dresser D. W., Mitchison N. A. The mechanism of immunological paralysis. Adv Immunol. 1968;8:129–181. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2776(08)60466-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. EISEN H. N. PREPARATION OF PURIFIED ANTI-2,4-DINITROPHENYL ANTIBODIES. Methods Med Res. 1964;10:94–102. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Feldmann M. Induction of immunity and tolerance in vitro by hapten protein conjugates. 3. Hapten inhibition studies of antigen binding to B cells in immunity and tolerance. J Exp Med. 1972 Sep 1;136(3):532–545. doi: 10.1084/jem.136.3.532. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Feldmann M. Induction of immunity and tolerance in vitro by hapten protein conjugates. I. The relationship between the degree of hapten conjugation and the immunogenicity of dinitrophenylated polymerized flagellin. J Exp Med. 1972 Apr 1;135(4):735–753. doi: 10.1084/jem.135.4.735. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Gershon R. K., Kondo K. Cell interactions in the induction of tolerance: the role of thymic lymphocytes. Immunology. 1970 May;18(5):723–737. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hamilton J. A., Miller J. F. Hapten-specific tolerance in mice. I. Induction with hapten-coupled syngeneic erythrocytes. Eur J Immunol. 1974 Apr;4(4):261–268. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830040407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Havas H. F. The effect of the carrier protein on the immune response and on the induction of tolerance in mice to the 2,4-dinitrophenyl determinant. Immunology. 1969 Dec;17(6):819–829. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Howard J. G. Cellular events in the induction and loss of tolerance to pneumococcal polysaccharides. Transplant Rev. 1972;8:50–75. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065x.1972.tb01564.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Inman J. K., Merchant B., Tacey S. E. Synthesis of large haptenic compounds having a common functional group that permits covalent linkage to proteins, cell surfaces, and adsorbents. Immunochemistry. 1973 Mar;10(3):153–163. doi: 10.1016/0019-2791(73)90004-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Janeway C. A., Jr Cellular cooperation during in vivo anti-hapten antibody responses. I. The effect of cell number on the response. J Immunol. 1975 Apr;114(4):1394–1401. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Katz D. H., Hamaoka T., Benacerraf B. Immunological tolerance in bone marrow-derived lymphocytes. I. Evidence for an intracellular mechanism of inactivation of hapten-specific precursors of antibody-forming cells. J Exp Med. 1972 Dec 1;136(6):1404–1429. doi: 10.1084/jem.136.6.1404. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kettman J. In vitro induction of specific unresponsiveness against the 2,4,6-trinitrophenyl determinant. I. The induction of unresponsiveness. J Immunol. 1974 Mar;112(3):1139–1148. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Kindred B. Specific unresponsiveness in nude mice given antigen before T cells. Eur J Immunol. 1975 Sep;5(9):609–612. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830050906. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Klinman N. R., Press J. L. Expression of specific clones during B cell development. Fed Proc. 1975 Jan;34(1):47–50. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Klinman N. R., Press J. L. The B cell specificity repertoire: its relationship to definable subpopulations. Transplant Rev. 1975;24:41–83. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065x.1975.tb00165.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Klinman N. R., Press J. L. The characterization fo the B-cell repertoire specific for the 2,4-dinitrophenyl and 2,4,6-trinitrophenyl determinants in neonatal BALB/c mice. J Exp Med. 1975 May 1;141(5):1133–1146. doi: 10.1084/jem.141.5.1133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Klinman N. R., Taylor R. B. General methods for the study of cells and serum during the immune response: the response to dinitrophenyl in mice. Clin Exp Immunol. 1969 Apr;4(4):473–487. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Klinman N. R. The mechanism of antigenic stimulation of primary and secondary clonal precursor cells. J Exp Med. 1972 Aug 1;136(2):241–260. doi: 10.1084/jem.136.2.241. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Klinman N. R. The secondary immune response to a hapten in vitro. Antigen concentration and the carrier effect. J Exp Med. 1971 May 1;133(5):963–972. doi: 10.1084/jem.133.5.963. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Louis J., Chiller J. M., Weigle W. O. Fate of antigen-binding cells in unresponsive and immune mice. J Exp Med. 1973 Feb 1;137(2):461–469. doi: 10.1084/jem.137.2.461. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Mosier D. E., Johnson B. M. Ontogeny of mouse lymphocyte function. II. Development of the ability to produce antibody is modulated by T lymphocytes. J Exp Med. 1975 Jan 1;141(1):216–226. doi: 10.1084/jem.141.1.216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Nossal G. J., Pike B. L. Evidence for the clonal abortion theory of B-lymphocyte tolerance. J Exp Med. 1975 Apr 1;141(4):904–917. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Press J. L., Klinman N. R. Enumeration and analysis of antibody-forming cell precursors in the neonatal mouse. J Immunol. 1973 Sep;111(3):829–835. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Press J. L., Klinman N. R. Frequency of hapten-specific B cells in neonatal and adult murine spleens. Eur J Immunol. 1974 Mar;4(3):155–159. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830040302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Press J. L., Klinman N. R. Monoclonal production of both IgM and IgG1 antihapten antibody. J Exp Med. 1973 Jul 1;138(1):300–305. doi: 10.1084/jem.138.1.300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. ROWE D. S., FAHEY J. L. A NEW CLASS OF HUMAN IMMUNOGLOBULINS. II. NORMAL SERUM IGD. J Exp Med. 1965 Jan 1;121:185–199. doi: 10.1084/jem.121.1.185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Raff M. C., Owen J. J., Cooper M. D., Lawton A. R., 3rd, Megson M., Gathings W. E. Differences in susceptibility of mature and immature mouse B lymphocytes to anti-immunoglobulin-induced immunoglobulin suppression in vitro. Possible implications for B-cell tolerance to self. J Exp Med. 1975 Nov 1;142(5):1052–1064. doi: 10.1084/jem.142.5.1052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Rittenberg M. B., Amkraut A. A. Immunogenicity of trinitrophenyl-hemocyanin: production of primary and secondary anti-hapten precipitins. J Immunol. 1966 Sep;97(3):421–430. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Schrader J. W. The in vitro induction of immunological tolerance in the B lymphocyte by oligovalent thymus-dependent antigens. J Exp Med. 1975 May 1;141(5):962–973. doi: 10.1084/jem.141.5.962. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Sherwin W. K., Rowlands D. T., Jr Determinants of the hierarchy of humoral immune responsiveness during ontogeny. J Immunol. 1975 Dec;115(6):1549–1554. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Sidman C. L., Unanue E. R. Receptor-mediated inactivation of early B lymphocytes. Nature. 1975 Sep 11;257(5522):149–151. doi: 10.1038/257149a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Strayer D. S., Lee W. M., Rowley D. A., Köhler H. Anti-receptor antibody. II. Induction of long-term unresponsiveness in neonatal mice. J Immunol. 1975 Feb;114(2 Pt 2):728–733. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Tada T., Takemori T. Selective roles of thymus-derived lymphocytes in the antibody response. I. Differential suppressive effect of carrier-primed T cells on hapten-specific IgM and IgG antibody responses. J Exp Med. 1974 Jul 1;140(1):239–252. doi: 10.1084/jem.140.1.239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Taylor R. B. Cellular cooperation in the antibody response of mice to two serum albumins: specific function of thymus cells. Transplant Rev. 1969;1:114–149. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065x.1969.tb00138.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Trump G. N., Singer S. J. Electrophoretically homogeneous anti-DNP antibodies with restricted isoelectric points elicited in mice by immunization with the antigen papain-S-DNPL. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1970 Jun;66(2):411–418. doi: 10.1073/pnas.66.2.411. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Vitetta E. S., Melcher U., McWilliams M., Lamm M. E., Phillips-Quagliata J. M., Uhr J. W. Cell surface immunoglobulin. XI. The appearance of an IgD-like molecule on murine lymphoid cells during ontogeny. J Exp Med. 1975 Jan 1;141(1):206–215. doi: 10.1084/jem.141.1.206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Vitetta E. S., Uhr J. W. Immunoglobulin-receptors revisited. Science. 1975 Sep 19;189(4207):964–969. doi: 10.1126/science.1083069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Walters C. S., Moorhead J. W., Claman H. N. Immunity tolerance to a hapten (NIP) coupled to an isologous carrier (mouse gamma globulin). J Exp Med. 1972 Sep 1;136(3):546–555. doi: 10.1084/jem.136.3.546. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Weigle W. O. Immunological unresponsiveness. Adv Immunol. 1973;16:61–122. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2776(08)60296-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Experimental Medicine are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES