Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of Bacteriology logoLink to Journal of Bacteriology
. 1985 Jul;163(1):317–323. doi: 10.1128/jb.163.1.317-323.1985

Growth substrate effects on acetate and methanol catabolism in Methanosarcina sp. strain TM-1.

S H Zinder, A F Elias
PMCID: PMC219115  PMID: 4008444

Abstract

When Methanosarcina sp. strain TM-1 is grown in medium in which both methanol and acetate are present, growth is biphasic, with methanol used as the primary catabolic substrate during the first phase. To better understand this phenomenon, we grew cells on methanol or on acetate or on both and examined the abilities of anaerobically washed cells to catabolize these substrates. Washed acetate-grown cells incubated with 10 mM acetate, 10 mM methanol, or both substrates together produced methane at initial rates of 325, 3, and 315 nmol min-1 mg of protein-1, respectively. Although the initial rate of methanogenesis from both substrates was nearly identical to the rate for acetate alone, after several hours of incubation the rate was greater for cells provided with both substrates. Studies with 14C-labeled methanol indicated that methanol was catabolized to methane at increasing rates by acetate-grown cells in a manner reminiscent of an induction curve, but only when cells were provided with acetate as a cosubstrate. Acetate was presumably providing energy and carbon for induction of methanol-catabolic enzymes. Methanol-grown cells showed a pattern of substrate utilization significantly different from that of acetate-grown cells, producing methane from 10 mM acetate, 10 mM methanol, or both substrates at initial rates of 10, 280, and 450 nmol min-1 mg of protein-1, respectively. There was significant oxidation of the methyl group of acetate during metabolism of both substrates. Cells grown on methanol-acetate and harvested before methanol depletion (methanol phase) showed catabolic patterns nearly identical to those of methanol-grown cells, including a low rate of methanogenesis from acetate. Cells harvested from methanol-acetate cultures in the acetate phase were capable of significant methanogenesis from either methanol or acetate alone, and the rate from both substrates together was nearly equal to the sum of the rates for the single substrates. When both 10 mM methanol and 10 mM acetate were presented to the acetate-phase cells, there was a preference for the methanol. These results are consistent with a model for regulation in Methanosarcina sp. strain TM-1 in which methanol represses acetate catabolism while methanol catabolism is inducible.

Full text

PDF
317

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Balch W. E., Fox G. E., Magrum L. J., Woese C. R., Wolfe R. S. Methanogens: reevaluation of a unique biological group. Microbiol Rev. 1979 Jun;43(2):260–296. doi: 10.1128/mr.43.2.260-296.1979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Baresi L. Methanogenic cleavage of acetate by lysates of Methanosarcina barkeri. J Bacteriol. 1984 Oct;160(1):365–370. doi: 10.1128/jb.160.1.365-370.1984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Baresi L., Wolfe R. S. Levels of coenzyme F420, coenzyme M, hydrogenase, and methylcoenzyme M methylreductase in acetate-grown Methanosarcina. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1981 Feb;41(2):388–391. doi: 10.1128/aem.41.2.388-391.1981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Ferguson T. J., Mah R. A. Effect of H(2)-CO(2) on Methanogenesis from Acetate or Methanol in Methanosarcina spp. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1983 Aug;46(2):348–355. doi: 10.1128/aem.46.2.348-355.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hutten T. J., Bongaerts H. C., van der Drift C., Vogels G. D. Acetate, methanol and carbon dioxide as substrates for growth of Methanosarcina barkeri. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 1980;46(6):601–610. doi: 10.1007/BF00394016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kenealy W. R., Zeikus J. G. One-carbon metabolism in methanogens: evidence for synthesis of a two-carbon cellular intermediate and unification of catabolism and anabolism in Methanosarcina barkeri. J Bacteriol. 1982 Aug;151(2):932–941. doi: 10.1128/jb.151.2.932-941.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Krzycki J. A., Wolkin R. H., Zeikus J. G. Comparison of unitrophic and mixotrophic substrate metabolism by acetate-adapted strain of Methanosarcina barkeri. J Bacteriol. 1982 Jan;149(1):247–254. doi: 10.1128/jb.149.1.247-254.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kühn W., Fiebig K., Walther R., Gottschalk G. Presence of a cytochrome b559 in Methanosarcina barkeri. FEBS Lett. 1979 Sep 15;105(2):271–274. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(79)80627-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Mah R. A., Ward D. M., Baresi L., Glass T. L. Biogenesis of methane. Annu Rev Microbiol. 1977;31:309–341. doi: 10.1146/annurev.mi.31.100177.001521. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. McInerney M. J., Bryant M. P. Anaerobic Degradation of Lactate by Syntrophic Associations of Methanosarcina barkeri and Desulfovibrio Species and Effect of H(2) on Acetate Degradation. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1981 Feb;41(2):346–354. doi: 10.1128/aem.41.2.346-354.1981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Schauer N. L., Ferry J. G. Metabolism of formate in Methanobacterium formicicum. J Bacteriol. 1980 Jun;142(3):800–807. doi: 10.1128/jb.142.3.800-807.1980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Smith M. R., Mah R. A. Growth and methanogenesis by Methanosarcina strain 227 on acetate and methanol. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1978 Dec;36(6):870–879. doi: 10.1128/aem.36.6.870-879.1978. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Sowers K. R., Baron S. F., Ferry J. G. Methanosarcina acetivorans sp. nov., an Acetotrophic Methane-Producing Bacterium Isolated from Marine Sediments. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1984 May;47(5):971–978. doi: 10.1128/aem.47.5.971-978.1984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Weimer P. J., Zeikus J. G. Acetate metabolism in Methanosarcina barkeri. Arch Microbiol. 1978 Nov 13;119(2):175–182. doi: 10.1007/BF00964270. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Winter J., Wolfe R. S. Complete degradation of carbohydrate to carbon dioxide and methane by syntrophic cultures of Acetobacterium woodii and Methanosarcina barkeri. Arch Microbiol. 1979 Apr;121(1):97–102. doi: 10.1007/BF00409211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Zeikus J. G. The biology of methanogenic bacteria. Bacteriol Rev. 1977 Jun;41(2):514–541. doi: 10.1128/br.41.2.514-541.1977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Zinder S. H., Mah R. A. Isolation and Characterization of a Thermophilic Strain of Methanosarcina Unable to Use H(2)-CO(2) for Methanogenesis. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1979 Nov;38(5):996–1008. doi: 10.1128/aem.38.5.996-1008.1979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. van der Meijden P., Heythuysen H. J., Pouwels A., Houwen F., van der Drift C., Vogels G. D. Methyltransferases involved in methanol conversion by Methanosarcina barkeri. Arch Microbiol. 1983 Jun;134(3):238–242. doi: 10.1007/BF00407765. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Bacteriology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES