Skip to main content
The Journal of Experimental Medicine logoLink to The Journal of Experimental Medicine
. 1993 Oct 1;178(4):1459–1463. doi: 10.1084/jem.178.4.1459

Suppressive effect of antibody on processing of T cell epitopes

PMCID: PMC2191211  PMID: 7690836

Abstract

Immunoglobulins drive efficient antigen capture by antigen presenting cells for processing and presentation on class II MHC-molecules. High affinity antibody/antigen interactions are stable at endosomal/lysosomal pH thus altering the substrate for antigen processing. We show that this can result in strong suppression of presentation of some T cell epitopes. This effect was observed when the antibody specificity was a B cell surface Ig, or formed part of an immune complex. In the latter case the presence of the suppressing antibody boosts presentation of other T cell epitopes through enhanced uptake into Fc receptor bearing cells. The influence of bound antibodies on the outcome of antigen processing may influence with T cell epitopes dominate T cell responses and may change the focus of the response with time.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (462.2 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Barnett B. C., Burt D. S., Graham C. M., Warren A. P., Skehel J. J., Thomas D. B. I-Ad restricted T cell recognition of influenza hemagglutinin. Synthetic peptides identify multiple epitopes corresponding to antibody-binding regions of the HA1 subunit. J Immunol. 1989 Oct 15;143(8):2663–2669. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Barnett B. C., Graham C. M., Burt D. S., Skehel J. J., Thomas D. B. The immune response of BALB/c mice to influenza hemagglutinin: commonality of the B cell and T cell repertoires and their relevance to antigenic drift. Eur J Immunol. 1989 Mar;19(3):515–521. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830190316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Berzofsky J. A. T-B reciprocity. An Ia-restricted epitope-specific circuit regulating T cell-B cell interaction and antibody specificity. Surv Immunol Res. 1983;2(3):223–229. doi: 10.1007/BF02918417. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Davidson H. W., Watts C. Epitope-directed processing of specific antigen by B lymphocytes. J Cell Biol. 1989 Jul;109(1):85–92. doi: 10.1083/jcb.109.1.85. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Demotz S., Lanzavecchia A., Eisel U., Niemann H., Widmann C., Corradin G. Delineation of several DR-restricted tetanus toxin T cell epitopes. J Immunol. 1989 Jan 15;142(2):394–402. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Eisel U., Jarausch W., Goretzki K., Henschen A., Engels J., Weller U., Hudel M., Habermann E., Niemann H. Tetanus toxin: primary structure, expression in E. coli, and homology with botulinum toxins. EMBO J. 1986 Oct;5(10):2495–2502. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1986.tb04527.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Eynon E. E., Parker D. C. Small B cells as antigen-presenting cells in the induction of tolerance to soluble protein antigens. J Exp Med. 1992 Jan 1;175(1):131–138. doi: 10.1084/jem.175.1.131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Fairweather N. F., Lyness V. A. The complete nucleotide sequence of tetanus toxin. Nucleic Acids Res. 1986 Oct 10;14(19):7809–7812. doi: 10.1093/nar/14.19.7809. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Jemmerson R., Paterson Y. Mapping epitopes on a protein antigen by the proteolysis of antigen-antibody complexes. Science. 1986 May 23;232(4753):1001–1004. doi: 10.1126/science.2422757. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Lanzavecchia A. Antigen-specific interaction between T and B cells. Nature. 1985 Apr 11;314(6011):537–539. doi: 10.1038/314537a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Lassila O., Vainio O., Matzinger P. Can B cells turn on virgin T cells? Nature. 1988 Jul 21;334(6179):253–255. doi: 10.1038/334253a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Manca F., Fenoglio D., Kunkl A., Cambiaggi C., Sasso M., Celada F. Differential activation of T cell clones stimulated by macrophages exposed to antigen complexed with monoclonal antibodies. A possible influence of paratope specificity on the mode of antigen processing. J Immunol. 1988 May 1;140(9):2893–2898. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Manca F., Kunkl A., Fenoglio D., Fowler A., Sercarz E., Celada F. Constraints in T-B cooperation related to epitope topology on E. coli beta-galactosidase. I. The fine specificity of T cells dictates the fine specificity of antibodies directed to conformation-dependent determinants. Eur J Immunol. 1985 Apr;15(4):345–350. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830150408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Michalek M. T., Benacerraf B., Rock K. L. Two genetically identical antigen-presenting cell clones display heterogeneity in antigen processing. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989 May;86(9):3316–3320. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.9.3316. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Ozaki S., Berzofsky J. A. Antibody conjugates mimic specific B cell presentation of antigen: relationship between T and B cell specificity. J Immunol. 1987 Jun 15;138(12):4133–4142. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Scherle P. A., Gerhard W. Functional analysis of influenza-specific helper T cell clones in vivo. T cells specific for internal viral proteins provide cognate help for B cell responses to hemagglutinin. J Exp Med. 1986 Oct 1;164(4):1114–1128. doi: 10.1084/jem.164.4.1114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Sheshberadaran H., Payne L. G. Protein antigen-monoclonal antibody contact sites investigated by limited proteolysis of monoclonal antibody-bound antigen: protein "footprinting". Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Jan;85(1):1–5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.1.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Steinman R. M. The dendritic cell system and its role in immunogenicity. Annu Rev Immunol. 1991;9:271–296. doi: 10.1146/annurev.iy.09.040191.001415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Unanue E. R., Allen P. M. The basis for the immunoregulatory role of macrophages and other accessory cells. Science. 1987 May 1;236(4801):551–557. doi: 10.1126/science.2437650. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Experimental Medicine are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES