Skip to main content
PMC home page
The Journal of Experimental Medicine logoLink to The Journal of Experimental Medicine
. 1994 Jun 1;179(6):1973–1983. doi: 10.1084/jem.179.6.1973

CD4-mediated enhancement or inhibition of T cell activation does not require the CD4:p56lck association

PMCID: PMC2191513  PMID: 8195720

Abstract

CD4 is the coreceptor molecule expressed on the surface of T cells specific for or restricted by class II molecules of the major histocompatibility complex (MHC). Its expression on T cells is required for an optimal response to antigen (Ag). Three mechanisms have been invoked for the involvement of CD4 in T cell activation. First, it was shown that CD4 binds to MHC class II molecules on antigen presenting cells (APCs) thereby favoring an adhesion between effector cells and APCs. Association of CD4 to the T cell receptor and to the tyrosine kinase p56lck have also been shown to be critically involved in the positive function of CD4. Here, we demonstrate that the interaction of CD4 with p56lck is not required to enhance the response of two CD4- dependent, Ag-specific T cell hybridomas. Mutant forms of CD4 (TCD4), which lose association to p56lck, were expressed in these T cells and were shown to enhance the Ag-specific response as efficiently as the wild-type CD4. Moreover both CD4-dependent and independent T cell responses were inhibited by CD4-specific mAbs even when CD4 was not associated with p56lck. These results indicate that mechanisms distinct from sequestration of p56lck and/or negative signaling operate in these inhibitions. Results demonstrating enhancement of TCR-mediated signaling by the coaggregation of TCD4 mutant to the TCR further confirm that the association of p56lck to CD4 is not absolutely required for the regulatory functions of CD4. Our results suggest that the mechanisms implicated in the enhancement of T cell stimulation via CD4 depend solely on the extracellular and transmembrane domains of CD4.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.2 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Ballhausen W. G., Reske-Kunz A. B., Tourvieille B., Ohashi P. S., Parnes J. R., Mak T. W. Acquisition of an additional antigen specificity after mouse CD4 gene transfer into a T helper hybridoma. J Exp Med. 1988 Apr 1;167(4):1493–1498. doi: 10.1084/jem.167.4.1493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bank I., Chess L. Perturbation of the T4 molecule transmits a negative signal to T cells. J Exp Med. 1985 Oct 1;162(4):1294–1303. doi: 10.1084/jem.162.4.1294. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Clayton L. K., Sieh M., Pious D. A., Reinherz E. L. Identification of human CD4 residues affecting class II MHC versus HIV-1 gp120 binding. Nature. 1989 Jun 15;339(6225):548–551. doi: 10.1038/339548a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Collins T. L., Uniyal S., Shin J., Strominger J. L., Mittler R. S., Burakoff S. J. p56lck association with CD4 is required for the interaction between CD4 and the TCR/CD3 complex and for optimal antigen stimulation. J Immunol. 1992 Apr 1;148(7):2159–2162. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Dianzani U., Redoglia V., Malavasi F., Bragardo M., Pileri A., Janeway C. A., Jr, Bottomly K. Isoform-specific associations of CD45 with accessory molecules in human T lymphocytes. Eur J Immunol. 1992 Feb;22(2):365–371. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830220212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Doyle C., Strominger J. L. Interaction between CD4 and class II MHC molecules mediates cell adhesion. Nature. 1987 Nov 19;330(6145):256–259. doi: 10.1038/330256a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Fleury S., Lamarre D., Meloche S., Ryu S. E., Cantin C., Hendrickson W. A., Sekaly R. P. Mutational analysis of the interaction between CD4 and class II MHC: class II antigens contact CD4 on a surface opposite the gp120-binding site. Cell. 1991 Sep 6;66(5):1037–1049. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90447-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Glaichenhaus N., Shastri N., Littman D. R., Turner J. M. Requirement for association of p56lck with CD4 in antigen-specific signal transduction in T cells. Cell. 1991 Feb 8;64(3):511–520. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90235-q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Graham F. L., van der Eb A. J. A new technique for the assay of infectivity of human adenovirus 5 DNA. Virology. 1973 Apr;52(2):456–467. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(73)90341-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kanagawa O., Maki R. Inhibition of MHC class II-restricted T cell response by Lyt-2 alloantigen. J Exp Med. 1989 Sep 1;170(3):901–912. doi: 10.1084/jem.170.3.901. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Killeen N., Sawada S., Littman D. R. Regulated expression of human CD4 rescues helper T cell development in mice lacking expression of endogenous CD4. EMBO J. 1993 Apr;12(4):1547–1553. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1993.tb05798.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. König R., Huang L. Y., Germain R. N. MHC class II interaction with CD4 mediated by a region analogous to the MHC class I binding site for CD8. Nature. 1992 Apr 30;356(6372):796–798. doi: 10.1038/356796a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Lamarre D., Capon D. J., Karp D. R., Gregory T., Long E. O., Sékaly R. P. Class II MHC molecules and the HIV gp 120 envelope protein interact with functionally distinct regions of the CD4 molecule. EMBO J. 1989 Nov;8(11):3271–3277. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1989.tb08487.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Letourneur F., Gabert J., Cosson P., Blanc D., Davoust J., Malissen B. A signaling role for the cytoplasmic segment of the CD8 alpha chain detected under limiting stimulatory conditions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990 Mar;87(6):2339–2343. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.6.2339. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Maddon P. J., Littman D. R., Godfrey M., Maddon D. E., Chess L., Axel R. The isolation and nucleotide sequence of a cDNA encoding the T cell surface protein T4: a new member of the immunoglobulin gene family. Cell. 1985 Aug;42(1):93–104. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(85)80105-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Marrack P., Endres R., Shimonkevitz R., Zlotnik A., Dialynas D., Fitch F., Kappler J. The major histocompatibility complex-restricted antigen receptor on T cells. II. Role of the L3T4 product. J Exp Med. 1983 Oct 1;158(4):1077–1091. doi: 10.1084/jem.158.4.1077. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Merkenschlager M., Altmann D. M., Ikeda H. T cell alloresponses against HLA-DQ and -DR products involve multiple epitopes on the CD4 molecule. Distinct mechanisms contribute to the inhibition of HLA class II-dependent and -independent T cell responses by antibodies to CD4. J Immunol. 1990 Nov 15;145(10):3181–3187. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Miceli M. C., von Hoegen P., Parnes J. R. Adhesion versus coreceptor function of CD4 and CD8: role of the cytoplasmic tail in coreceptor activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991 Apr 1;88(7):2623–2627. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.7.2623. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Molina T. J., Kishihara K., Siderovski D. P., van Ewijk W., Narendran A., Timms E., Wakeham A., Paige C. J., Hartmann K. U., Veillette A. Profound block in thymocyte development in mice lacking p56lck. Nature. 1992 May 14;357(6374):161–164. doi: 10.1038/357161a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Owens T., Fazekas de St Groth B., Miller J. F. Coaggregation of the T-cell receptor with CD4 and other T-cell surface molecules enhances T-cell activation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 Dec;84(24):9209–9213. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.24.9209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Reske-Kunz A. B., Rüde E. Insulin-specific T cell hybridomas derived from (H-2b x H-2k)F1 mice preferably employ F1-unique restriction elements for antigen recognition. Eur J Immunol. 1985 Oct;15(10):1048–1054. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830151017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Rudd C. E., Trevillyan J. M., Dasgupta J. D., Wong L. L., Schlossman S. F. The CD4 receptor is complexed in detergent lysates to a protein-tyrosine kinase (pp58) from human T lymphocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Jul;85(14):5190–5194. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.14.5190. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Saizawa K., Rojo J., Janeway C. A., Jr Evidence for a physical association of CD4 and the CD3:alpha:beta T-cell receptor. Nature. 1987 Jul 16;328(6127):260–263. doi: 10.1038/328260a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Shaw A. S., Amrein K. E., Hammond C., Stern D. F., Sefton B. M., Rose J. K. The lck tyrosine protein kinase interacts with the cytoplasmic tail of the CD4 glycoprotein through its unique amino-terminal domain. Cell. 1989 Nov 17;59(4):627–636. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90008-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Sleckman B. P., Peterson A., Jones W. K., Foran J. A., Greenstein J. L., Seed B., Burakoff S. J. Expression and function of CD4 in a murine T-cell hybridoma. Nature. 1987 Jul 23;328(6128):351–353. doi: 10.1038/328351a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Straus D. B., Weiss A. Genetic evidence for the involvement of the lck tyrosine kinase in signal transduction through the T cell antigen receptor. Cell. 1992 Aug 21;70(4):585–593. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90428-f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Sékaly R. P., Croteau G., Bowman M., Scholl P., Burakoff S., Geha R. S. The CD4 molecule is not always required for the T cell response to bacterial enterotoxins. J Exp Med. 1991 Feb 1;173(2):367–371. doi: 10.1084/jem.173.2.367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Tanabe M., Karaki S., Takiguchi M., Nakauchi H. Antigen recognition by the T cell receptor is enhanced by CD8 alpha-chain binding to the alpha 3 domain of MHC class I molecules, not by signaling via the cytoplasmic domain of CD8 alpha. Int Immunol. 1992 Feb;4(2):147–152. doi: 10.1093/intimm/4.2.147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Turner J. M., Brodsky M. H., Irving B. A., Levin S. D., Perlmutter R. M., Littman D. R. Interaction of the unique N-terminal region of tyrosine kinase p56lck with cytoplasmic domains of CD4 and CD8 is mediated by cysteine motifs. Cell. 1990 Mar 9;60(5):755–765. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90090-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Veillette A., Bookman M. A., Horak E. M., Samelson L. E., Bolen J. B. Signal transduction through the CD4 receptor involves the activation of the internal membrane tyrosine-protein kinase p56lck. Nature. 1989 Mar 16;338(6212):257–259. doi: 10.1038/338257a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. White J., Blackman M., Bill J., Kappler J., Marrack P., Gold D. P., Born W. Two better cell lines for making hybridomas expressing specific T cell receptors. J Immunol. 1989 Sep 15;143(6):1822–1825. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Xu H., Littman D. R. A kinase-independent function of Lck in potentiating antigen-specific T cell activation. Cell. 1993 Aug 27;74(4):633–643. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90511-n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. von Hoegen P., Miceli M. C., Tourvieille B., Schilham M., Parnes J. R. Equivalence of human and mouse CD4 in enhancing antigen responses by a mouse class II-restricted T cell hybridoma. J Exp Med. 1989 Dec 1;170(6):1879–1886. doi: 10.1084/jem.170.6.1879. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Experimental Medicine are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES