Abstract
The growth yields of Escherichia coli on glucose, lactose, galactose, maltose, maltotriose, and maltohexaose were estimated under anaerobic conditions in the absence of electron acceptors. The yields on these substrates exhibited significant differences when measured in carbon-limited chemostats at similar growth rates and compared in terms of grams (dry weight) of cells produced per mole of hexose utilized. Maltohexaose was the most efficiently utilized substrate, and galactose was the least efficiently utilized under these conditions. All these sugars were known to be metabolized to glucose 6-phosphate and produced the same pattern of fermentation products. The differences in growth yields were ascribed to differences in energy costs for transport and phosphorylation of these sugars. A formalized treatment of these factors in determining growth yields was established and used to obtain values for the cost of transport and hence the energy-coupling stoichiometries for the transport of substrates via proton symport and binding-protein-dependent mechanisms in vivo. By this approach, the proton-lactose stoichiometry was found to be 1.1 to 1.8 H+ per lactose, equivalent to approximately 0.5 ATP used per lactose transported. The cost of transporting maltose via a binding-protein-dependent mechanism was considerably higher, being over 1 to 1.2 ATP per maltose or maltodextrin transported. The formalized treatment also permitted estimation of the net ATP yield from the metabolism of these sugars; it was calculated that the growth yield data were consistent with the production of 2.8 to 3.2 ATP in the metabolism of glucose 6-phosphate to fermentation products.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Andrews K. J., Lin E. C. Selective advantages of various bacterial carbohydrate transport mechanisms. Fed Proc. 1976 Aug;35(10):2185–2189. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- BAUCHOP T., ELSDEN S. R. The growth of micro-organisms in relation to their energy supply. J Gen Microbiol. 1960 Dec;23:457–469. doi: 10.1099/00221287-23-3-457. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dills S. S., Apperson A., Schmidt M. R., Saier M. H., Jr Carbohydrate transport in bacteria. Microbiol Rev. 1980 Sep;44(3):385–418. doi: 10.1128/mr.44.3.385-418.1980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ferenci T., Boos W., Schwartz M., Szmelcman S. Energy-coupling of the transport system of Escherichia coli dependent on maltose-binding protein. Eur J Biochem. 1977 May 2;75(1):187–193. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1977.tb11516.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ferenci T., Kornberg H. L. The role of phosphotransferase-mediated syntheses of fructose 1-phosphate and fructose 6-phosphate in the growth of Escherichia coli on fructose. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1974 Sep 17;187(1087):105–119. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1974.0065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hempfling W. P., Mainzer S. E. Effects of varying the carbon source limiting growth on yield and maintenance characteristics of Escherichia coli in continuous culture. J Bacteriol. 1975 Sep;123(3):1076–1087. doi: 10.1128/jb.123.3.1076-1087.1975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Henderson P. J., Giddens R. A., Jones-Mortimer M. C. Transport of galactose, glucose and their molecular analogues by Escherichia coli K12. Biochem J. 1977 Feb 15;162(2):309–320. doi: 10.1042/bj1620309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Henderson P. J. The inter-relationship between proton-coupled and binding-protein-dependent transport systems in bacteria. Biochem Soc Trans. 1980 Dec;8(6):678–679. doi: 10.1042/bst0080678. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hengge R., Boos W. Maltose and lactose transport in Escherichia coli. Examples of two different types of concentrative transport systems. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1983 Aug 11;737(3-4):443–478. doi: 10.1016/0304-4157(83)90009-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kaback H. R. The lac carrier protein in Escherichia coli. J Membr Biol. 1983;76(2):95–112. doi: 10.1007/BF02000610. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kashket E. R. Stoichiometry of the H+-ATPase of Escherichia coli cells during anaerobic growth. FEBS Lett. 1983 Apr 18;154(2):343–346. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(83)80179-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Macpherson A. J., Jones-Mortimer M. C., Horne P., Henderson P. J. Identification of the GalP galactose transport protein of Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem. 1983 Apr 10;258(7):4390–4396. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Muir M. E., van Heeswyck R. S., Wallace B. J. Effect of growth rate on streptomycin accumulation by Escherichia coli and Bacillus megaterium. J Gen Microbiol. 1984 Aug;130(8):2015–2022. doi: 10.1099/00221287-130-8-2015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Otto R., Sonnenberg A. S., Veldkamp H., Konings W. N. Generation of an electrochemical proton gradient in Streptococcus cremoris by lactate efflux. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1980 Sep;77(9):5502–5506. doi: 10.1073/pnas.77.9.5502. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Postma P. W., Roseman S. The bacterial phosphoenolpyruvate: sugar phosphotransferase system. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1976 Dec 14;457(3-4):213–257. doi: 10.1016/0304-4157(76)90001-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vink R., Bendall M. R., Simpson S. J., Rogers P. J. Estimation of H+ to adenosine 5'-triphosphate stoichiometry of Escherichia coli ATP synthase using 31P NMR. Biochemistry. 1984 Jul 31;23(16):3667–3675. doi: 10.1021/bi00311a015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wandersman C., Schwartz M., Ferenci T. Escherichia coli mutants impaired in maltodextrin transport. J Bacteriol. 1979 Oct;140(1):1–13. doi: 10.1128/jb.140.1.1-13.1979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]