Skip to main content
The Journal of Experimental Medicine logoLink to The Journal of Experimental Medicine
. 1996 Nov 1;184(5):2013–2018. doi: 10.1084/jem.184.5.2013

CD4+ but not CD8+ cells are essential for allorejection

PMCID: PMC2192869  PMID: 8920888

Abstract

The generation of knockout mice with targeted gene disruption has provided a valuable tool for studying the immune response. Here we describe the use of CD4 and CD8 knockout mice to examine the role of CD4+ and CD8+ cells in initiating allotransplantation rejection. Pretreatment with a brief course of depletive anti-CD4 monoclonal antibody therapy allowed permanent survival of heart, but not skin, allografts transplanted across a major histocompatibility barrier. However, skin as well as heart grafts were permanently accepted in the CD4 knockout mice. Transfer of CD4+ cells into CD4 knockout recipient mice 1 d before skin engraftment reconstituted rejection, demonstrating that CD4+ cells are necessary for initiating rejection of allogeneic transplants. Major histocompatibility complex disparate heart and skin allografts transplanted into CD8 knockout recipients were rejected within 10 d. This study demonstrates that CD4+ but not CD8+ T cells are absolutely required to initiate allograft rejection.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (455.7 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Alters S. E., Song H. K., Fathman C. G. Evidence that clonal anergy is induced in thymic migrant cells after anti-CD4-mediated transplantation tolerance. Transplantation. 1993 Sep;56(3):633–638. doi: 10.1097/00007890-199309000-00026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Burdick J. F., Clow L. W. Rejection of murine cardiac allografts. I. Relative roles of major and minor antigens. Transplantation. 1986 Jul;42(1):67–72. doi: 10.1097/00007890-198607000-00015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bushell A., Morris P. J., Wood K. J. Transplantation tolerance induced by antigen pretreatment and depleting anti-CD4 antibody depends on CD4+ T cell regulation during the induction phase of the response. Eur J Immunol. 1995 Sep;25(9):2643–2649. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830250936. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chace J. H., Cowdery J. S., Field E. H. Effect of anti-CD4 on CD4 subsets. I. Anti-CD4 preferentially deletes resting, naive CD4 cells and spares activated CD4 cells. J Immunol. 1994 Jan 15;152(2):405–412. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Chen Z., Cobbold S., Metcalfe S., Waldmann H. Tolerance in the mouse to major histocompatibility complex-mismatched heart allografts, and to rat heart xenografts, using monoclonal antibodies to CD4 and CD8. Eur J Immunol. 1992 Mar;22(3):805–810. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830220326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cobbold S. P., Jayasuriya A., Nash A., Prospero T. D., Waldmann H. Therapy with monoclonal antibodies by elimination of T-cell subsets in vivo. Nature. 1984 Dec 6;312(5994):548–551. doi: 10.1038/312548a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cobbold S. P., Martin G., Qin S., Waldmann H. Monoclonal antibodies to promote marrow engraftment and tissue graft tolerance. Nature. 1986 Sep 11;323(6084):164–166. doi: 10.1038/323164a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Cobbold S. P., Martin G., Waldmann H. The induction of skin graft tolerance in major histocompatibility complex-mismatched or primed recipients: primed T cells can be tolerized in the periphery with anti-CD4 and anti-CD8 antibodies. Eur J Immunol. 1990 Dec;20(12):2747–2755. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830201232. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Corry R. J., Winn H. J., Russell P. S. Primarily vascularized allografts of hearts in mice. The role of H-2D, H-2K, and non-H-2 antigens in rejection. Transplantation. 1973 Oct;16(4):343–350. doi: 10.1097/00007890-197310000-00010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Dalloul A. H., Chmouzis E., Ngo K., Fung-Leung W. P. Adoptively transferred CD4+ lymphocytes from CD8 -/- mice are sufficient to mediate the rejection of MHC class II or class I disparate skin grafts. J Immunol. 1996 Jun 1;156(11):4114–4119. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Dalloul A. H., Ngo K., Fung-Leung W. P. CD4-negative cytotoxic T cells with a T cell receptor alpha/beta intermediate expression in CD8-deficient mice. Eur J Immunol. 1996 Jan;26(1):213–218. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830260133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Dialynas D. P., Wilde D. B., Marrack P., Pierres A., Wall K. A., Havran W., Otten G., Loken M. R., Pierres M., Kappler J. Characterization of the murine antigenic determinant, designated L3T4a, recognized by monoclonal antibody GK1.5: expression of L3T4a by functional T cell clones appears to correlate primarily with class II MHC antigen-reactivity. Immunol Rev. 1983;74:29–56. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065x.1983.tb01083.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Fung-Leung W. P., Schilham M. W., Rahemtulla A., Kündig T. M., Vollenweider M., Potter J., van Ewijk W., Mak T. W. CD8 is needed for development of cytotoxic T cells but not helper T cells. Cell. 1991 May 3;65(3):443–449. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90462-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hall B. M. Cells mediating allograft rejection. Transplantation. 1991 Jun;51(6):1141–1151. doi: 10.1097/00007890-199106000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Han W. R., Mottram P. L., McKenzie I. F. Comparison of CD4 depleting and nondepleting monoclonal antibodies in the mouse heart allograft model. Transplant Proc. 1993 Oct;25(5):2933–2934. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Herbert J., Roser B. Strategies of monoclonal antibody therapy that induce permanent tolerance of organ transplants. Transplantation. 1988 Aug;46(2 Suppl):128S–134S. doi: 10.1097/00007890-198808001-00024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Hergueux J., Bodmer H., Cardell S., Chan S. H., Cosgrove D., Benoist C., Mathis D. Knock-out mice: a new tool for transplantation immunologists. Transplant Proc. 1993 Feb;25(1 Pt 1):30–32. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Ljunggren H. G., Van Kaer L., Sabatine M. S., Auchincloss H., Jr, Tonegawa S., Ploegh H. L. MHC class I expression and CD8+ T cell development in TAP1/beta 2-microglobulin double mutant mice. Int Immunol. 1995 Jun;7(6):975–984. doi: 10.1093/intimm/7.6.975. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Lowry R. P., Forbes R. D., Blackburn J. H., Marghesco D. M. Immune mechanisms in organ allograft rejection. V. Pivotal role of the cytotoxic-suppressor T cell subset in the rejection of heart grafts bearing isolated class I disparities in the inbred rat. Transplantation. 1985 Nov;40(5):545–550. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Mottram P. L., Purcell L. J., Pietersz G. A., McKenzie I. F. Tolerance induction with anti-CD8 monoclonal antibodies in the mouse heart transplant model. Transplant Proc. 1993 Oct;25(5):2935–2936. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Pearson T. C., Darby C. R., Bushell A. R., West L. J., Morris P. J., Wood K. J. The assessment of transplantation tolerance induced by anti-CD4 monoclonal antibody in the murine model. Transplantation. 1993 Feb;55(2):361–367. doi: 10.1097/00007890-199302000-00025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Peugh W. N., Superina R. A., Wood K. J., Morris P. J. The role of H-2 and non-H-2 antigens and genes in the rejection of murine cardiac allografts. Immunogenetics. 1986;23(1):30–37. doi: 10.1007/BF00376519. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Qin S., Cobbold S., Tighe H., Benjamin R., Waldmann H. CD4 monoclonal antibody pairs for immunosuppression and tolerance induction. Eur J Immunol. 1987 Aug;17(8):1159–1165. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830170813. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Rahemtulla A., Fung-Leung W. P., Schilham M. W., Kündig T. M., Sambhara S. R., Narendran A., Arabian A., Wakeham A., Paige C. J., Zinkernagel R. M. Normal development and function of CD8+ cells but markedly decreased helper cell activity in mice lacking CD4. Nature. 1991 Sep 12;353(6340):180–184. doi: 10.1038/353180a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Rosenberg A. S., Mizuochi T., Sharrow S. O., Singer A. Phenotype, specificity, and function of T cell subsets and T cell interactions involved in skin allograft rejection. J Exp Med. 1987 May 1;165(5):1296–1315. doi: 10.1084/jem.165.5.1296. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Rosenberg A. S., Mizuochi T., Singer A. Evidence for involvement of dual-function T cells in rejection of MHC class I disparate skin grafts. Assessment of MHC class I alloantigens as in vivo helper determinants. J Exp Med. 1988 Jul 1;168(1):33–45. doi: 10.1084/jem.168.1.33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Rosenberg A. S., Munitz T. I., Maniero T. G., Singer A. Cellular basis of skin allograft rejection across a class I major histocompatibility barrier in mice depleted of CD8+ T cells in vivo. J Exp Med. 1991 Jun 1;173(6):1463–1471. doi: 10.1084/jem.173.6.1463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Roser B. J. Cellular mechanisms in neonatal and adult tolerance. Immunol Rev. 1989 Feb;107:179–202. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065x.1989.tb00009.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Schilham M. W., Fung-Leung W. P., Rahemtulla A., Kuendig T., Zhang L., Potter J., Miller R. G., Hengartner H., Mak T. W. Alloreactive cytotoxic T cells can develop and function in mice lacking both CD4 and CD8. Eur J Immunol. 1993 Jun;23(6):1299–1304. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830230617. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Schmidt-Wolf I. G., Dejbakhsh-Jones S., Ginzton N., Greenberg P., Strober S. T-cell subsets and suppressor cells in human bone marrow. Blood. 1992 Dec 15;80(12):3242–3250. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Seydel K., Shizuru J., Grossman D., Wu A., Alters S., Fathman C. G. Anti-CD8 abrogates effect of anti-CD4-mediated islet allograft survival in rat model. Diabetes. 1991 Nov;40(11):1430–1434. doi: 10.2337/diab.40.11.1430. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Shizuru J. A., Gregory A. K., Chao C. T., Fathman C. G. Islet allograft survival after a single course of treatment of recipient with antibody to L3T4. Science. 1987 Jul 17;237(4812):278–280. doi: 10.1126/science.2955518. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Stepkowski S. M., Raza-Ahmad A., Duncan W. R. The role of class I and class II MHC antigens in the rejection of vascularized heart allografts in mice. Transplantation. 1987 Dec;44(6):753–759. doi: 10.1097/00007890-198712000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Sugarbaker P. H., Chang A. E. Uncovered skin grafts in mice. J Immunol Methods. 1979;31(1-2):167–175. doi: 10.1016/0022-1759(79)90297-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Wang Y. C., Mayne A., Sell K. W., Ahmed-Ansari A. The influence of MHC and non-MHC genes on the nature of murine cardiac allograft rejection. I. Kinetic analysis of mononuclear cell infiltrate and MHC-class I/class II expression in donor tissue. Transplantation. 1990 Aug;50(2):313–324. doi: 10.1097/00007890-199008000-00028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Yamamoto H., Monden M., Kawai M., Uenaka A., Gotoh M., Mori T., Sakurai M., Shiku H., Nakayama E. The role of CD8+ and CD4+ cells in islet allograft rejection. Transplantation. 1990 Jul;50(1):120–125. doi: 10.1097/00007890-199007000-00022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Yin D., Fathman C. G. CD4-positive suppressor cells block allotransplant rejection. J Immunol. 1995 Jun 15;154(12):6339–6345. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Yin D., Fathman C. G. Tissue-specific effects of anti-CD4 therapy in induction of allograft unresponsiveness in high and low responder rats. Transpl Immunol. 1995 Sep;3(3):258–264. doi: 10.1016/0966-3274(95)80033-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Experimental Medicine are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES