Abstract
The earliest assessments of bone "mass" involved metacarpal morphometry that provided insight into age-related changes, the effects of low habitual dietary calcium intake, and the effects of estrogen deficiency and replacement. Single photon absorptiometry (SPA) made quantitative mass measurement possible but this was intellectually unsatisfactory since osteoporotic fractures are more of a concern at the spine and hip than at the wrist. Necessity forced the development of axial bone mass measurement (dual photon absorptiometry--DPA, dual energy xray absorptiometry--DXA, quantitative computed tomography--QCT). Hip measurements provide a better prediction of hip fracture risk than measurements at any other skeletal site. For every standard deviation decrement of bone mass at the hip, relative risk of fracture is 3.0. At non-hip sites the relative risk is only 2.0 for each standard deviation decrement in bone mass. However measurement at non-hip sites provide a fracture risk prediction that is at least the equal of blood pressure measurement for predicting risk of CVA, and substantially better than the risk assessment of acute MI afforded by cholesterol measurement. An important caveat of the superiority of hip measurement is that the data are derived from short-term studies in older women (> 70 years). The relative risk data from phalangeal, forearm, and heel measurements have all been obtained from longer-term studies in younger women. From a community health perspective, bone density measurements, no matter how accurate, precise, and meaningful, have limited value if access to the technology is limited. Peripheral measurements can be obtained on existing radiographic equipment (phalanges), or small, portable, inexpensive dedicated equipment (forearm, heel). This technology is more likely to make it to the office of the primary care physician than the larger, more expensive, dedicated equipment needed for hip measurements. The peripheral measurement technology is also suitable for high traffic areas, just as blood pressure and cholesterol measurements are widely available. This presentation reviewed the scientific validity of peripheral bone mass measurement and explored the potential for making this technology available at non-traditional facilities such as pharmacies, shopping malls, health clubs, etc.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Arlot M. E., Sornay-Rendu E., Garnero P., Vey-Marty B., Delmas P. D. Apparent pre- and postmenopausal bone loss evaluated by DXA at different skeletal sites in women: the OFELY cohort. J Bone Miner Res. 1997 Apr;12(4):683–690. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.1997.12.4.683. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cummings S. R., Black D. M., Nevitt M. C., Browner W., Cauley J., Ensrud K., Genant H. K., Palermo L., Scott J., Vogt T. M. Bone density at various sites for prediction of hip fractures. The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group. Lancet. 1993 Jan 9;341(8837):72–75. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(93)92555-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Genant H. K., Engelke K., Fuerst T., Glüer C. C., Grampp S., Harris S. T., Jergas M., Lang T., Lu Y., Majumdar S. Noninvasive assessment of bone mineral and structure: state of the art. J Bone Miner Res. 1996 Jun;11(6):707–730. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.5650110602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hui S. L., Slemenda C. W., Johnston C. C., Jr Age and bone mass as predictors of fracture in a prospective study. J Clin Invest. 1988 Jun;81(6):1804–1809. doi: 10.1172/JCI113523. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kanis J. A. Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis: synopsis of a WHO report. WHO Study Group. Osteoporos Int. 1994 Nov;4(6):368–381. doi: 10.1007/BF01622200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kelly T. L., Crane G., Baran D. T. Single X-ray absorptiometry of the forearm: precision, correlation, and reference data. Calcif Tissue Int. 1994 Mar;54(3):212–218. doi: 10.1007/BF00301681. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Looker A. C., Johnston C. C., Jr, Wahner H. W., Dunn W. L., Calvo M. S., Harris T. B., Heyse S. P., Lindsay R. L. Prevalence of low femoral bone density in older U.S. women from NHANES III. J Bone Miner Res. 1995 May;10(5):796–802. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.5650100517. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Marshall D., Johnell O., Wedel H. Meta-analysis of how well measures of bone mineral density predict occurrence of osteoporotic fractures. BMJ. 1996 May 18;312(7041):1254–1259. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7041.1254. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Melton L. J., 3rd How many women have osteoporosis now? J Bone Miner Res. 1995 Feb;10(2):175–177. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.5650100202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Njeh C. F., Boivin C. M., Langton C. M. The role of ultrasound in the assessment of osteoporosis: a review. Osteoporos Int. 1997;7(1):7–22. doi: 10.1007/BF01623454. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]