Skip to main content
The Journal of General Physiology logoLink to The Journal of General Physiology
. 1959 Sep 1;43(1):159–188. doi: 10.1085/jgp.43.1.159

Electrophysiology of Supramedullary Neurons in Spheroides maculatus

I. Orthodromic and antidromic responses

M V L Bennett 1, S M Crain 1, H Grundfest 1
PMCID: PMC2194970  PMID: 13798948

Abstract

This series of three papers presents data on a system of neurons, the large supramedullary cells (SMC) of the puffer, Spheroides maculatus, in terms of the physiological properties of the individual cells, of their afferent and efferent connections, and of their interconnections. Some of these findings are verified by available anatomical data, but others suggest structures that must be sought for in the light of the demonstration that these cells are not sensory neurons. Analysis on so broad a scale was made possible by the accessibility of the cells in a compact cluster on the dorsal surface of the spinal cord. Simultaneous recordings were made intracellularly and extracellularly from individual cells or from several, frequently with registration of the afferent or efferent activity as well. The passive and active electrical properties of the SMC are essentially similar to those of other neurons, but various response characteristics have been observed which are related to different excitabilities of different parts of the neuron, and to specific anatomical features. The SMC produce spikes to direct stimuli by intracellular depolarization, or by indirect synaptic excitation from many afferent paths, including tactile stimulation of the skin. Responses that were evoked by intracellular stimulation of a single cell cause an efferent discharge bilaterally in many dorsal roots, but not in the ventral. Sometimes several distinct spikes occurred in the same root, and behaved independently. Thus, a number of axons are efferent from each neuron. They are large unmyelinated fibers which give rise to the elevation of slowest conduction in the compound action potential of the dorsal root. A similar component is absent in the ventral root action potential. Antidromic stimulation of the axons causes small potentials in the cell body, indicating that the antidromic spikes are blocked distantly to the soma, probably in the axon branches. The failure of antidromic invasion is correlated with differences in excitability of the axons and the neurite from which they arise. As recorded in the cell body, the postsynaptic potentials associated with stimulation of afferent fibers in the dorsal roots or cranial nerves are too small to discharge the soma spike. The indirect spike has two components, the first of which is due to the synaptically initiated activity of the neurite and which invades the cell body. The second component is then produced when the soma is fired. The neurite impulse arises at some distance from the cell body and propagates centrifugally as well as centripetally. An indirect stimulus frequently produces repetitive spikes which are observed to occur synchronously in all the cells examined at one time. Each discharge gives rise to a large efferent volley in each of the dorsal roots and cranial nerves examined. The synchronized responses of all the SMC to indirect stimulation occur with slightly different latencies. They are due to a combination of excitation by synaptic bombardment from the afferent pathways and by excitatory interconnections among the SMC. Direct stimulation of a cell may also excite all the others. This spread of activity is facilitated by repetitive direct excitation of the cell as well as by indirect stimulation.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.7 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. ADRIAN R. H. The effect of internal and external potassium concentration on the membrane potential of frog muscle. J Physiol. 1956 Sep 27;133(3):631–658. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1956.sp005615. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. ARAKI T., OTANI T. Response of single motoneurons to direct stimulation in toad's spinal cord. J Neurophysiol. 1955 Sep;18(5):472–485. doi: 10.1152/jn.1955.18.5.472. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. BENNETT M. V., CRAIN S. M., GRUNDFEST H. Electrophysiology of supramedullary neurons in Spheroides maculatus. II. Properties of the electrically excitable membrane. J Gen Physiol. 1959 Sep;43:189–219. doi: 10.1085/jgp.43.1.189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. BENNETT M. V., CRAIN S. M., GRUNDFEST H. Electrophysiology of supramedullary neurons in Spheroides maculatus. III. Organization of the supramedullary neurons. J Gen Physiol. 1959 Sep;43:221–250. doi: 10.1085/jgp.43.1.221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. BULLOCK T. H., TERZUOLO C. A. Diverse forms of activity in the somata of spontaneous and integrating ganglion cells. J Physiol. 1957 Oct 30;138(3):341–364. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1957.sp005855. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. COOMBS J. S., CURTIS D. R., ECCLES J. C. The interpretation of spike potentials of motoneurones. J Physiol. 1957 Dec 3;139(2):198–231. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1957.sp005887. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. FATT P. Sequence of events in synaptic activation of a motoneurone. J Neurophysiol. 1957 Jan;20(1):61–80. doi: 10.1152/jn.1957.20.1.61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. FRANK K., FUORTES M. G. Potentials recorded from the spinal cord with microelectrodes. J Physiol. 1955 Dec 29;130(3):625–654. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1955.sp005432. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. GRUNDFEST H., KAO C. Y., ALTAMIRANO M. Bioelectric effects of ions microinjected into the giant axon of Loligo. J Gen Physiol. 1954 Nov 20;38(2):245–282. doi: 10.1085/jgp.38.2.245. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. HAGIWARA S., SAITO N. Membrane potential change and membrane current in supramedullary nerve cell of puffer. J Neurophysiol. 1959 Mar;22(2):204–221. doi: 10.1152/jn.1959.22.2.204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. HUGHES A. The development of the primary sensory system in Xenopus laevis (Daudin). J Anat. 1957 Jul;91(3):323–338. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. LING G., GERARD R. W. The normal membrane potential of frog sartorius fibers. J Cell Physiol. 1949 Dec;34(3):383–396. doi: 10.1002/jcp.1030340304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of General Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES