Skip to main content
PMC home page
The Journal of General Physiology logoLink to The Journal of General Physiology
. 1960 Jan 1;43(3):509–522. doi: 10.1085/jgp.43.3.509

Studies on the Distribution of Factor I and Acetylcholine in Crustacean Peripheral Nerve

Ernst Florey 1, M A Biederman 1
PMCID: PMC2195011  PMID: 13823570

Abstract

Extracts of whole nerve (chelipeds of Cancer magister) cause inhibition of impulse generation of the crayfish stretch receptor preparation, similar to that produced by gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA). This is not found with extracts containing only sensory or sensory and motor fibers. Extracts of inhibitory fibers inhibit the stretch receptor discharge—indicating an inhibitory action equivalent to that of up to 30,000 micrograms of GABA per gm. wet weight of inhibitor fiber. This high value is taken as an indication that the inhibitory substance in crab inhibitory fibers is not identical with gamma-aminobutyric acid. Whole nerves were found to contain 1.7 to 6.7 µg. acetylcholine per gm. nerve tissue (clam ventricle and frog rectus abdominis muscle). No acetylcholine could be detected in extracts of motor and inhibitory fibers. The acetylcholine content of sensory fibers can account for the acetylcholine activity of whole nerve extract. It is concluded that the factor I of crustacean nerve is an exclusive property of the inhibitory fibers. The results support the assumption that factor I is the transmitter substance of inhibitory neurons in these animals. The absence of acetylcholine in motor fibers indicates that this substance does not function as a transmitter of motor impulses in Crustacea, and explains the previously observed failure of the substance to elicit motor responses in these animals. The function of acetylcholine in sensory fibers is not yet clarified.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (879.7 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. CURTIS D. R., PHILLIS J. W. gamma-Amino-n-butyric acid and spinal synaptic transmission. Nature. 1958 Aug 2;182(4631):323–323. doi: 10.1038/182323a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Chang H. C., Gaddum J. H. Choline esters in tissue extracts. J Physiol. 1933 Oct 6;79(3):255–285. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1933.sp003049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. ELLIOTT K. A., FLOREY E. Factor I--inhibitory factor from brain; assay; conditions in brain; simulating and antagonizing substances. J Neurochem. 1956 Dec;1(2):181–192. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.1956.tb12071.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. FLOREY E. An inhibitory and an excitatory factor of mammalian central nervous system, and their action of a single sensory neuron. Arch Int Physiol. 1954 Feb;62(1):33–53. doi: 10.3109/13813455409145367. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. FLOREY E., FLOREY E. Studies on the distribution of Factor I in mammalian brain. J Physiol. 1958 Dec 4;144(2):220–228. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1958.sp006096. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. FLOREY E., MCLENNAN H. Effects of an inhibitory factor (factor I) from brain on central synaptic transmission. J Physiol. 1955 Nov 28;130(2):446–455. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1955.sp005418. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. FLOREY E., MCLENNAN H. The release of an inhibitory substance from mammalian brain, and its effect on peripheral synaptic transmission. J Physiol. 1955 Aug 29;129(2):384–392. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1955.sp005361. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. FLOREY E. The action of factor I on certain invertebrate organs. Can J Biochem Physiol. 1956 Jul;34(4):669–681. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. FURSHPAN E. J., POTTER D. D. Transmission at the giant motor synapses of the crayfish. J Physiol. 1959 Mar 3;145(2):289–325. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1959.sp006143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. IWAMA K., JASPER H. H. The action of gamma aminobutyric acid upon cortical electrical activity in the cat. J Physiol. 1957 Oct 30;138(3):365–380. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1957.sp005856. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. KUFFLER S. W., EDWARDS C. Mechanism of gamma aminobutyric acid (GABA) action and its relation to synaptic inhibition. J Neurophysiol. 1958 Nov;21(6):589–610. doi: 10.1152/jn.1958.21.6.589. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. PURPURA D. P., GIRADO M., GRUNDFEST H. Central synaptic effects of omega-guanidino acids and amino acid derivatives. Science. 1958 May 16;127(3307):1179–1181. doi: 10.1126/science.127.3307.1179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. PURPURA D. P., GIRADO M., GRUNDFEST H. Mode of action of aliphatic amino acids on cortical synaptic activity. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1957 Aug-Sep;95(4):791–796. doi: 10.3181/00379727-95-23366. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. PURPURA D. P., GIRADO M., GRUNDFEST H. Selective blockade of excitatory synapses in the cat brain by gamma-aminobutyric acid. Science. 1957 Jun 14;125(3259):1200–1202. doi: 10.1126/science.125.3259.1200-a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. SCHALLEK W., WIERSMA C. A. G. Effects of anti-cholinesterases on synaptic transmission in the crayfish. Physiol Comp Ocol Int J Comp Physiol Ecol. 1949 Feb 1;1(2):63–67. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. VAN DER KLOOT W. G., ROBBINS J., COOKE I. M. Blocking by picrotoxin of peripheral inhibition in crayfish. Science. 1958 Mar 7;127(3297):521–522. doi: 10.1126/science.127.3297.521. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. WELSH J. H. Marine invertebrate preparations useful in the bioassay of acetylcholine and 5-hydroxytryptamine. Nature. 1954 May 15;173(4411):955–956. doi: 10.1038/173955a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. WELSH J. H., TAUB R. The action of acetylcholine antagonists on the heart of Venus mercenaria. Br J Pharmacol Chemother. 1953 Sep;8(3):327–333. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1953.tb00802.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. WELSH J. H., TAUB R. The action of choline and related compounds on the heart of Venus mercenaria. Biol Bull. 1948 Dec;95(3):346–353. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of General Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES