Skip to main content
The Journal of General Physiology logoLink to The Journal of General Physiology
. 1960 Mar 1;43(4):775–799. doi: 10.1085/jgp.43.4.775

The Nature of the Retinal Action Potential, and the Spectral Sensitivities of Ultraviolet and Green Receptor Systems of the Compound Eye of the Worker Honeybee

Timothy H Goldsmith 1
PMCID: PMC2195024  PMID: 13850754

Abstract

1. The retinal action potential consists principally of a sustained negative wave which persists for as long as the stimulus. Transitory negative on-effects and off-effects may also be present, particularly at long wave lengths (green, yellow, and red) and in the light-adapted eye. 2. Only the maintained component of the potential can be elicited under CO2 anesthesia. The transient components are reversibly eliminated from the response at about the same time as the background noise of nerve and muscle spikes. It is suggested that the sustained component arises from the receptor cells, and the other components from second and higher order neurons. 3. The compound eye does not contain a homogeneous population of receptors. A green receptor system (maximum sensitivity at about 535 mµ) determines the response of the dark-adapted eye throughout most of the spectrum; during adaptation to yellow light, however, an ultraviolet receptor system is revealed, with maximum sensitivity at about 345 mµ. The anatomical bases of these receptor systems are unknown; however, they include both retinula cells and neurons in the optic ganglion. 4. There is no change in spectral sensitivity (Purkinje shift) in the first three logarithmic units above the threshold of the retinal action potential. 5. The relatively great effectiveness of near ultraviolet light in stimulating the positive phototaxis of the bee does not depend on excitation of the ultraviolet receptor of the ocellus.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.3 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. AUERBACH E., WALD G. The participation of different types of cones in human light and dark adaptation. Am J Ophthalmol. 1955 Feb;39(2 Pt 2):24–40. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(55)90006-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. BURTT E. T., CATTON W. T. Electrical responses to visual stimulation in the optic lobes of the locust and certain other insects. J Physiol. 1956 Jul 27;133(1):68–88. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1956.sp005567. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. GOLDSMITH T. H., RUCK P. R. The spectral sensitivities of the dorsal ocelli of cockroaches and honeybees; an electrophysiological study. J Gen Physiol. 1958 Jul 20;41(6):1171–1185. doi: 10.1085/jgp.41.6.1171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Goldsmith T. H. THE VISUAL SYSTEM OF THE HONEYBEE. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1958 Feb;44(2):123–126. doi: 10.1073/pnas.44.2.123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. HARTLINE H. K., WAGNER H. G., MACNICHOL E. F., Jr The peripheral origin of nervous activity in the visual system. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1952;17:125–141. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1952.017.01.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of General Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES