Skip to main content
The Journal of General Physiology logoLink to The Journal of General Physiology
. 1960 May 1;43(5):981–998. doi: 10.1085/jgp.43.5.981

Effects of Polarization of the Receptor Membrane and of the First Ranvier Node in a Sense Organ

W R Loewenstein 1, N Ishiko 1
PMCID: PMC2195052  PMID: 14417919

Abstract

It has previously been shown that the site of production of the generator potential in Pacinian corpuscles is the receptor membrane of the non-myelinated ending, and the site of initiation of the nerve impulse, the adjacent (first) Ranvier node. Effects of membrane polarization of these sites were studied in the present work. Nerve ending and first Ranvier node were isolated by dissection, electric activity was recorded from, and polarizing currents were passed through them. All observations were done at steady levels of polarization, seconds after onset of current flow. The following results were obtained: The amount of charge transferred through the excited receptor membrane is a function of the electrical gradients across the membrane. The generator potential in response to equal mechanical stimuli increases with resting potential of the receptor membrane. The refractory state of the generator potential is not affected by polarization. The electrical threshold for impulse firing at the first Ranvier node (measured by the minimal amplitude of generator potential which elicits a nodal impulse) is nearly minimal at normal resting potential of the node. Both, hyperpolarization and depolarization lead to a rise in nodal threshold. For any level of polarization of nodal and receptor membrane, the threshold for production of impulses by adequate (mechanical) stimulation appears determined by the generator potential-stimulus strength relation and by the electrical threshold of the node.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (964.6 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. ALVAREZ-BUYLLA R., RAMIREZ DE ARELLANO J. Local responses in Pacinian corpuscles. Am J Physiol. 1953 Jan;172(1):237–244. doi: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1952.172.1.237. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. COOMBS J. S., ECCLES J. C., FATT P. Excitatory synaptic action in motoneurones. J Physiol. 1955 Nov 28;130(2):374–395. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1955.sp005413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. EDWARDS C. Changes in the discharge from a muscle spindle produced by electrotonus in the sensory nerve. J Physiol. 1955 Mar 28;127(3):636–640. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1955.sp005284. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. FATT P., KATZ B. An analysis of the end-plate potential recorded with an intracellular electrode. J Physiol. 1951 Nov 28;115(3):320–370. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1951.sp004675. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. GRAY J. A., SATO M. Properties of the receptor potential in Pacinian corpuscles. J Physiol. 1953 Dec 29;122(3):610–636. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1953.sp005025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. TASAKI I., FERNANDEZ C. Modification of cochlear microphonics and action potentials by KC1 solution and by direct currents. J Neurophysiol. 1952 Nov;15(6):497–512. doi: 10.1152/jn.1952.15.6.497. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of General Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES