Abstract
The effect of light and dark adaptation on the electrical activity in two species of nocturnal gecko, Hemidactylus turcicus and Tarentola mauritanica was studied. The electroretinogram of both species changes from the scotopic type in the dark-adapted state to the photopic type after strong light adaptation. For the scotopic response fusion frequencies up to 18 flashes per sec. are obtained in both species. For the photopic response fusion frequencies up to 50 flashes per sec. are seen in Tarentola, and up to 25 flashes per sec. in Hemidactylus. Proceeding from dark to light adaptation the increment threshold (dI) is measured at different levels of adaptive illumination (I). At low levels of illumination the dI/I ratio is found to be small and at high levels of illumination to be large. No difference in the dI/I ratio is obtained for test lights of 462 and 605 mµ. During dark adaptation the change of threshold after exposure to moderate and weak lights (up to 103 times dark threshold) is rather fast. After light adaptation to strong light (106 times dark threshold) duplex dark adaptation curves are seen with a break separating a fast and a slow phase of dark adaptation. The significance of these results from a retina which possesses sense cells of only one type is discussed.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (891.3 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- BEST W., BOHNEN K. Uber den off-Effekt im Elektroretinogramm des Menschen. Albrecht Von Graefes Arch Ophthalmol. 1957;158(6):568–577. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- DENTON E. J. The responses of the pupil of Gekko gekko to external light stimulus. J Gen Physiol. 1956 Nov 20;40(2):201–216. doi: 10.1085/jgp.40.2.201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- DODT E. Generalized inhibition of the retinal ganglion cells in relation to wavelength and state of adaptation. Acta Physiol Scand. 1956 May 18;36(3):219–228. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1956.tb01319.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- DODT E., HECK J. Retinapotentiale der zapfenfreien Netzhaut des Gecko Sphaerodactylus muralis. Pflugers Arch. 1954;259(3):226–230. doi: 10.1007/BF00843387. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Granit R., Riddell L. A. The electrical responses of light- and dark-adapted frogs' eyes to rhythmic and continuous stimuli. J Physiol. 1934 Mar 29;81(1):1–28. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1934.sp003112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- TANSLEY K. Some observations on mammalian cone electroretinograms. Bibl Ophthalmol. 1957;(48):7–14. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- TANSLEY K. The retina of two nocturnal geckos Hemidactylus turcicus and Tarentola mauritanica. Pflugers Arch. 1959;268(3):213–220. doi: 10.1007/BF00362521. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- UNDERWOOD G. Reptilian retinas. Nature. 1951 Feb 3;167(4240):183–185. doi: 10.1038/167183a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
