Skip to main content
The Journal of General Physiology logoLink to The Journal of General Physiology
. 1963 Sep 1;47(1):103–115. doi: 10.1085/jgp.47.1.103

The Reversion of Catalase during Growth of Yeast in Anaerobiosis

J Gordin Kaplan 1
PMCID: PMC2195334  PMID: 14060440

Abstract

Growth of originally aerobic bakers' yeast under conditions of anaerobiosis caused a decrease in the total specific catalatic activity (patent plus cryptic) of one-half per generation. It is concluded that reversion of catalase was a dilution, rather than a destruction, of the intracellular enzyme. However, the specific patent (whole cell) catalase activity remained constant for one or more generations, and then declined at a considerably slower rate than did the total activity. Thus the cryptic factor diminished progressively during anaerobic growth; after seven or eight generations virtually all the catalase was patent; i.e., the cryptic factor (the ratio of total enzyme to patent enzyme) was approximately unity. At this point, the basal level of enzyme was attained, and thereafter maintained by a basal synthesis, which produced only the patent, heat-stable, variety. Aerobic growth caused a significant, but much smaller, decline of both total catalase activity and of the cryptic factor. The data suggested that during reversion, the cryptic, heat-labile catalase became progressively converted to the patent, heat-resistant form. A model of these events is presented.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (736.2 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. ENGEL M. S., ADLER H. I. Catalase activity, sensitivity to hydrogen peroxide, and radiation response in the genus Escherichia. Radiat Res. 1961 Sep;15:269–275. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. FRASER M. J., KAPLAN J. G. The alteration of intracellular enzymes. III. The effect of temperature on the kinetics of altered and unaltered yeast catalase. J Gen Physiol. 1955 Mar 20;38(4):515–547. doi: 10.1085/jgp.38.4.515. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. KAPLAN J. G. The alteration of intracellular enzymes. II. The relation between the surface and the biological activities of altering agents. J Gen Physiol. 1954 Nov 20;38(2):197–211. doi: 10.1085/jgp.38.2.197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. KAPLAN J. G. The effect of inhibitors on the induction of cryptic and patent yeast catalase. Enzymologia. 1963 May 15;25:359–366. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. MANDELSTAM J. Induced biosynthesis of lysine decarboxylase in Bacterium cadaveris. J Gen Microbiol. 1954 Dec;11(3):426–437. doi: 10.1099/00221287-11-3-426. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. RICKENBERG H. V., YANOFSKY C., BONNER D. M. Enzymatic deadaptation. J Bacteriol. 1953 Dec;66(6):683–687. doi: 10.1128/jb.66.6.683-687.1953. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. ROBERTSON J. J., HALVORSON H. O. The components of maltozymase in yeast, and their behavior during deadaptation. J Bacteriol. 1957 Feb;73(2):186–198. doi: 10.1128/jb.73.2.186-198.1957. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. SPIEGELMAN S., DUNN R. Interactions between enzyme-forming systems during adaptation. J Gen Physiol. 1947 Nov 20;31(2):153–173. doi: 10.1085/jgp.31.2.153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. WRIGHT B. E., McNEIL G. On the mechanism of beta-galactosidase induction. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1961 Nov;95:343–347. doi: 10.1016/0003-9861(61)90157-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of General Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES