Skip to main content
The Journal of General Physiology logoLink to The Journal of General Physiology
. 1964 Mar 1;47(4):605–638. doi: 10.1085/jgp.47.4.605

Tracer and Non-Tracer Potassium Fluxes in Frog Sartorius Muscle and the Kinetics of Net Potassium Movement

R A Sjodin 1, E G Henderson 1
PMCID: PMC2195351  PMID: 14127602

Abstract

Experiments were performed to test the applicability of permeability kinetics to whole frog sartorius muscle using K42 ions as tracers of potassium flux. The whole muscle was found to obey closely the kinetic laws expected to hold for single cellular units in which the potassium fluxes are membrane-limited and intracellular mixing is rapid enough not to introduce serious error. In a 5 mM K Ringer's solution, potassium efflux was very nearly equal to influx when the rate constant for K42 loss was applied to the whole of the muscle potassium. Over a fairly wide range of external potassium concentration, the assumed unidirectional fluxes measured with tracer K42 showed good agreement with net potassium changes determined analytically. The specific activity of potassium lost from labeled muscles to an initially K-free Ringer's solution was measured as a test of the adequacy of intracellular mixing. The results were those expected for a population of cells with uniformly distributed intracellular K42. A small deviation was encountered which can be attributed either to a dispersion of fiber sizes in the sartorius or to a possible small additional cellular compartment in each individual fiber. The additional cellular compartment, should it exist, contains from 0.5 to 1 per cent of the muscle potassium. This is evidently not large enough to interfere seriously with the applicability of permeability kinetics to the whole muscle.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (2.0 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. ADRIAN R. H. Potassium chloride movement and the membrane potential of frog muscle. J Physiol. 1960 Apr;151:154–185. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. ADRIAN R. H. The effect of internal and external potassium concentration on the membrane potential of frog muscle. J Physiol. 1956 Sep 27;133(3):631–658. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1956.sp005615. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Adrian R. H., Freygang W. H. The potassium and chloride conductance of frog muscle membrane. J Physiol. 1962 Aug;163(1):61–103. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1962.sp006959. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Boyle P. J., Conway E. J. Potassium accumulation in muscle and associated changes. J Physiol. 1941 Aug 11;100(1):1–63. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1941.sp003922. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. CAREY M. J., CONWAY E. J. Comparison of various media for immersing frog sartorii at room temperature, and evidence for the regional distribution of fibre Na+. J Physiol. 1954 Aug 27;125(2):232–250. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1954.sp005154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. HARRIS E. J. Distribution and movement of muscle chloride. J Physiol. 1963 Apr;166:87–109. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1963.sp007092. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. HARRIS E. J. Permeation and diffusion of K ions in frog muscle. J Gen Physiol. 1957 Sep 20;41(1):169–195. doi: 10.1085/jgp.41.1.169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. HARRIS E. J., SJODIN R. A. Kinetics of exchange and net movement of frog muscle potassium. J Physiol. 1961 Feb;155:221–245. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1961.sp006624. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. HARRIS E. J., STEINBACH H. B. The extraction of ions from muscle by water and sugar solutions with a study of the degree of exchange with tracer of the sodium and potassium in the extracts. J Physiol. 1956 Aug 28;133(2):385–401. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1956.sp005594. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. HARRIS E. J. The exchange of frog muscle potassium. J Physiol. 1953 Apr 28;120(1-2):246–253. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1953.sp004889. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. HODGKIN A. L., HOROWICZ P. Movements of Na and K in single muscle fibres. J Physiol. 1959 Mar 3;145(2):405–432. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1959.sp006150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. HUXLEY A. F., TAYLOR R. E. Local activation of striated muscle fibres. J Physiol. 1958 Dec 30;144(3):426–441. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1958.sp006111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. PORTER K. R., PALADE G. E. Studies on the endoplasmic reticulum. III. Its form and distribution in striated muscle cells. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1957 Mar 25;3(2):269–300. doi: 10.1083/jcb.3.2.269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. SJODIN R. A. Rubidium and cesium fluxes in muscle as related to the membrane potential. J Gen Physiol. 1959 May 20;42(5):983–1003. doi: 10.1085/jgp.42.5.983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of General Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES