Skip to main content
The Journal of General Physiology logoLink to The Journal of General Physiology
. 1964 Mar 1;47(4):773–793. doi: 10.1085/jgp.47.4.773

Effects of D2O and Osmotic Gradients on Potential and Resistance of the Isolated Frog Skin

Barry D Lindley 1, T Hoshiko 1, D E Leb 1
PMCID: PMC2195354  PMID: 14127611

Abstract

Exposure of the outside surface of isolated frog skin (R. pipiens and R. catesbeiana) to sulfate solution made up with D2O decreased skin potential and resistance. Exposure of the inside surface to D2O solution decreased the potential slightly but increased the resistance. The changes were linearly related to the D2O concentration. Since D2O acts like a hyperosmotic solution, the skin potential and resistance were studied upon exposure to solution made hyperosmotic by addition of sucrose, mannitol, acetamide, urea, thiourea, Na2SO4, or K2SO4. Skin potential and resistance decreased when the outside solution was made hyperosmotic. The changes depended upon the concentration and the nature of the solute. Thiourea and urea solutions were the most effective. Treatment of the inside surface gave relatively small decreases in potential; the resistance either increased or remained unchanged. These effects appeared to depend upon the direction of the osmotic gradient across the skin rather than upon the value of the osmolarity compared to normal body fluids. Experiments with a series of six polyhydric alcohols from methanol to mannitol and the polysaccharides, sucrose and raffinose, showed adonitol with 5 carbons to decrease the potential the most. Smaller and larger compounds of this set gave lesser effects. As yet no consistent explanation of the effects is forthcoming, but their demonstration calls for caution in the indiscriminate use of solutes such as mannitol or sucrose "to make up the osmolality" and in the neglect of urea because "it penetrates freely."

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.1 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Brooks S. C. OSMOTIC EFFECTS OF DEUTERIUM OXIDE (HEAVY WATER) ON LIVING CELLS. Science. 1937 Nov 26;86(2239):497–498. doi: 10.1126/science.86.2239.497. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. DIAMOND J. M. The mechanism of water transport by the gall-bladder. J Physiol. 1962 May;161:503–527. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1962.sp006900. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. DURBIN R. P. Osmotic flow of water across permeable cellulose membranes. J Gen Physiol. 1960 Nov;44:315–326. doi: 10.1085/jgp.44.2.315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. ENGBAEK L., HOSHIKO T. Electrical potential gradients through frog skin. Acta Physiol Scand. 1957 Jul 1;39(4):348–355. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1957.tb01433.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. HANSEN A. T. A self-recording electronic osmometer for quick, direct measurement of colloid osmotic pressure in small samples. Acta Physiol Scand. 1961 Nov-Dec;53:197–213. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1961.tb02278.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. USSING H. H., ZERAHN K. Active transport of sodium as the source of electric current in the short-circuited isolated frog skin. Acta Physiol Scand. 1951 Aug 25;23(2-3):110–127. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1951.tb00800.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. WHITTEMBURY G. Action of antidiuretic hormone on the equivalent pore radius at both surfaces of the epithelium of the isolated toad skin. J Gen Physiol. 1962 Sep;46:117–130. doi: 10.1085/jgp.46.1.117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of General Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES