Skip to main content
The Journal of General Physiology logoLink to The Journal of General Physiology
. 1964 Mar 1;47(4):749–771. doi: 10.1085/jgp.47.4.749

The Effects of Alkali Metal Cations and Common Anions on the Frog Skin Potential

Barry D Lindley 1, T Hoshiko 1
PMCID: PMC2195355  PMID: 14127610

Abstract

The effects on the potential difference across isolated frog skin (R. catesbeiana, R. pipiens) of changing the ionic composition of the bathing solutions have been examined. Estimates of mean values and precision are presented for the potential changes produced by substituting other alkali metal cations for Na at the outside border and for K at the inside border. In terms of ability to mimic Na at the outside border of bullfrog skin, the selectivity order is Li > Rb, K, Cs; at the outside border of leopard frog skin, Li > Cs, K, Rb. In terms of ability to mimic K at the inside border of bullfrog and leopard frog skin: Rb > Cs > Li > Na. Orders of anion selectivity in terms of sensitivity of the potential for the outside border of bullfrog skin are Br > Cl > NO3 > I > SO4, isethionate and of leopard frog skin are Br, Cl > I, NO3, SO4. An effect of the solution composition (ionic strength?) on the apparent Na-K selectivity of the outside border is described. The results of the investigation have been interpreted and discussed in terms of the application of the constant field equation to the Koefoed-Johnsen-Ussing frog skin model. These observations may be useful in constructing and testing models of biological ionic selectivity.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.1 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. HODGKIN A. L., KATZ B. The effect of sodium ions on the electrical activity of giant axon of the squid. J Physiol. 1949 Mar 1;108(1):37–77. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1949.sp004310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. HUF E. G., WILLS J. Influence of some inorganic cations on active salt and water uptake by isolated frog skin. Am J Physiol. 1951 Oct;167(1):255–260. doi: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1951.167.1.255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. MULLINS L. J. Penetration of anions through frog skin. Am J Physiol. 1958 Aug;194(2):369–372. doi: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1958.194.2.369. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. OMACHI A., MACEY R. I., WALDECK J. G. Permeability of cell membranes to amine buffers and their effects on electrolyte transport. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1961 Jun 17;92:478–485. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1961.tb44997.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. SJODIN R. A. Rubidium and cesium fluxes in muscle as related to the membrane potential. J Gen Physiol. 1959 May 20;42(5):983–1003. doi: 10.1085/jgp.42.5.983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. TEORELL T. Rhythmical potential and impedance variations in isolated frog skin induced by lithium ions. Acta Physiol Scand. 1954 Jul 18;31(2-3):268–284. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1954.tb01138.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. USSING H. H., ZERAHN K. Active transport of sodium as the source of electric current in the short-circuited isolated frog skin. Acta Physiol Scand. 1951 Aug 25;23(2-3):110–127. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1951.tb00800.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. ZERAHN K. Studies on the active transport of lithium in the isolated frog skin. Acta Physiol Scand. 1955 Aug 19;33(4):347–358. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1955.tb01214.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of General Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES