Skip to main content
The Journal of General Physiology logoLink to The Journal of General Physiology
. 1964 Sep 1;48(1):15–42. doi: 10.1085/jgp.48.1.15

The Mechanism of Isotonic Water Transport

Jared M Diamond 1
PMCID: PMC2195404  PMID: 14212146

Abstract

The mechanism by which active solute transport causes water transport in isotonic proportions across epithelial membranes has been investigated. The principle of the experiments was to measure the osmolarity of the transported fluid when the osmolarity of the bathing solution was varied over an eightfold range by varying the NaCl concentration or by adding impermeant non-electrolytes. An in vitro preparation of rabbit gall bladder was suspended in moist oxygen without an outer bathing solution, and the pure transported fluid was collected as it dripped off the serosal surface. Under all conditions the transported fluid was found to approximate an NaCl solution isotonic to whatever bathing solution used. This finding means that the mechanism of isotonic water transport in the gall bladder is neither the double membrane effect nor co-diffusion but rather local osmosis. In other words, active NaCl transport maintains a locally high concentration of solute in some restricted space in the vicinity of the cell membrane, and water follows NaCl in response to this local osmotic gradient. An equation has been derived enabling one to calculate whether the passive water permeability of an organ is high enough to account for complete osmotic equilibration of actively transported solute. By application of this equation, water transport associated with active NaCl transport in the gall bladder cannot go through the channels for water flow under passive conditions, since these channels are grossly too impermeable. Furthermore, solute-linked water transport fails to produce the streaming potentials expected for water flow through these passive channels. Hence solute-linked water transport does not occur in the passive channels but instead involves special structures in the cell membrane, which remain to be identified.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.7 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. CURRAN P. F., MACINTOSH J. R. A model system for biological water transport. Nature. 1962 Jan 27;193:347–348. doi: 10.1038/193347a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. DIAMOND J. M. TRANSPORT OF SALT AND WATER IN RABBIT AND GUINEA PIG GALL BLADDER. J Gen Physiol. 1964 Sep;48:1–14. doi: 10.1085/jgp.48.1.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. DIAMOND J. M. The mechanism of solute transport by the gall-bladder. J Physiol. 1962 May;161:474–502. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1962.sp006899. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. DIAMOND J. M. The mechanism of water transport by the gall-bladder. J Physiol. 1962 May;161:503–527. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1962.sp006900. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. DURBIN R. P., FRANK H., SOLOMON A. K. Water flow through frog gastric mucosa. J Gen Physiol. 1956 Mar 20;39(4):535–551. doi: 10.1085/jgp.39.4.535. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. DURBIN R. P. Osmotic flow of water across permeable cellulose membranes. J Gen Physiol. 1960 Nov;44:315–326. doi: 10.1085/jgp.44.2.315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. HEISEY S. R., HELD D., PAPPENHEIMER J. R. Bulk flow and diffusion in the cerebrospinal fluid system of the goat. Am J Physiol. 1962 Nov;203:775–781. doi: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1962.203.5.775. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. HOGBEN C. A. Active transport of chloride by isolated frog gastric epithelium; origin of the gastric mucosal potential. Am J Physiol. 1955 Mar;180(3):641–649. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. OGILVIE J. T., McINTOSH J. R., CURRAN P. F. Volume flow in a series-membrane system. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1963 May 21;66:441–444. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. PARSONS D. S., WINGATE D. L. The effect of osmotic gradients on fluid transfer across rat intestine in vitro. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1961 Jan 1;46:170–183. doi: 10.1016/0006-3002(61)90660-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. PIDOT A. L., DIAMOND J. M. STREAMING POTENTIALS IN A BIOLOGICAL MEMBRANE. Nature. 1964 Feb 15;201:701–702. doi: 10.1038/201701a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Patlak C. S., Goldstein D. A., Hoffman J. F. The flow of solute and solvent across a two-membrane system. J Theor Biol. 1963 Nov;5(3):426–442. doi: 10.1016/0022-5193(63)90088-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. SCHREINER G. E. Determination of inulin by means of resorcinol. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1950 May;74(1):117–120. doi: 10.3181/00379727-74-17827. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. SMYTH D. H., TAYLOR C. B. Transfer of water and solutes by an in vitro intestinal preparation. J Physiol. 1957 May 23;136(3):632–648. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1957.sp005788. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. WHEELER H. O. TRANSPORT OF ELECTROLYTES AND WATER ACROSS WALL OF RABBIT GALL BLADDER. Am J Physiol. 1963 Sep;205:427–438. doi: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1963.205.3.427. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. WHITTEMBURY G., OKEN D. E., WINDHAGER E. E., SOLOMON A. K. Single proximal tubules of Necturus kidney. IV. Dependence of H20 movement on osmotic gradients. Am J Physiol. 1959 Nov;197:1121–1127. doi: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1959.197.5.1121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of General Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES