Skip to main content
PMC home page
The Journal of General Physiology logoLink to The Journal of General Physiology
. 1965 Mar 1;48(4):647–671. doi: 10.1085/jgp.48.4.647

The Effect of Mucosal and Serosal Solution Cations on Bioelectric Properties of the Isolated Toad Bladder

John T Gatzy 1, T W Clarkson 1
PMCID: PMC2195430  PMID: 14324980

Abstract

The spontaneous transtissue potential and the DC conductance of the isolated toad bladder were measured when the tissue was exposed to sulfate Ringer's solutions of modified ionic composition. Na+ was replaced to varying extents by (C2H5)3NH+, (C2H5)4N+, Li+, Cs+, K+, or Rb+. Reversible and irreversible changes were observed. The reversible changes were consistent with equations derived from the Nernst-Planck diffusion equation, and gave the following functional description of the bladder: (a) the potential measurements were compatible with two membranes in series; (b) the mucosal surface was more permeable to Na+ than to other monovalent cations; (c) the serosal surface was permeable to both K+ and Na+ but preferentially to K+; (d) the rate of Na+ diffusion across the mucosal membrane appeared to approach a maximum but two alternative interpretations are discussed; (e) the conductance data were consistent with the assumption of a constant concentration gradient for the penetrating ions within the membrane (Henderson's assumption) provided suitable hypotheses are made concerning the Na+ distribution between the membrane surfaces and the bulk phases of the adjacent solutions; (f) the conductance and spontaneous potential data suggested that the mucosal membranes of a small fraction of the epithelial cells were more permeable than the mucosal membranes of the majority of these cells. The irreversible changes were almost entirely associated with cation substitution in the serosal solution. However, Li+ produced an irreversible fall in voltage when added to either side of the tissue.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.3 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. CHOI J. K. The fine structure of the urinary bladder of the toad, Bufo marinus. J Cell Biol. 1963 Jan;16:53–72. doi: 10.1083/jcb.16.1.53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. ENGBAEK L., HOSHIKO T. Electrical potential gradients through frog skin. Acta Physiol Scand. 1957 Jul 1;39(4):348–355. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1957.tb01433.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. FRAZIER H. S., DEMPSEY E. F., LEAF A. Movement of sodium across the mucosal surface of the isolated toad bladder and its modification by vasopressin. J Gen Physiol. 1962 Jan;45:529–543. doi: 10.1085/jgp.45.3.529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. FRAZIER H. S., HAMMER E. I. EFFLUX OF SODIUM FROM ISOLATED TOAD BLADDER. Am J Physiol. 1963 Oct;205:718–722. doi: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1963.205.4.718. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. FRAZIER H. S. The electrical potential profile of the isolated toad bladder. J Gen Physiol. 1962 Jan;45:515–528. doi: 10.1085/jgp.45.3.515. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. HAYS R. M., LEAF A. Studies on the movement of water through the isolated toad bladder and its modification by vasopressin. J Gen Physiol. 1962 May;45:905–919. doi: 10.1085/jgp.45.5.905. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. HAYS R. M., LEAF A. The problem of clinical vasopressin resistance: in vitro studies. Ann Intern Med. 1961 Apr;54:700–709. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-54-4-700. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. HODGKIN A. L., KATZ B. The effect of sodium ions on the electrical activity of giant axon of the squid. J Physiol. 1949 Mar 1;108(1):37–77. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1949.sp004310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. HODGKIN A. L., KEYNES R. D. The potassium permeability of a giant nerve fibre. J Physiol. 1955 Apr 28;128(1):61–88. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1955.sp005291. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. KOEFOED-JOHNSEN V., USSING H. H. The nature of the frog skin potential. Acta Physiol Scand. 1958 Jun 2;42(3-4):298–308. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1958.tb01563.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. LEAF A., ANDERSON J., PAGE L. B. Active sodium transport by the isolated toad bladder. J Gen Physiol. 1958 Mar 20;41(4):657–668. doi: 10.1085/jgp.41.4.657. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. LEAF A., HAYS R. M. Permeability of the isolated toad bladder to solutes and its modification by vasopressin. J Gen Physiol. 1962 May;45:921–932. doi: 10.1085/jgp.45.5.921. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. LEAF A. Measurement of the permeability of the two surfaces of a living membrane. Science. 1958 Jul 18;128(3316):144–145. doi: 10.1126/science.128.3316.144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. LEAF A., PAGE L. B., ANDERSON J. Respiration and active sodium transport of isolated toad bladder. J Biol Chem. 1959 Jun;234(6):1625–1629. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. LINDLEY B. D., HOSHIKO T. THE EFFECTS OF ALKALI METAL CATIONS AND COMMON ANIONS ON THE FROG SKIN POTENTIAL. J Gen Physiol. 1964 Mar;47:749–771. doi: 10.1085/jgp.47.4.749. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. MACROBBIE E. A., USSING H. H. Osmotic behaviour of the epithelial cells of frog skin. Acta Physiol Scand. 1961 Nov-Dec;53:348–365. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1961.tb02293.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. MAFFLY R. H., HAYS R. M., LAMDIN E., LEAF A. The effect of neurohypophyseal hormones on the permeability of the toad bladder to urea. J Clin Invest. 1960 Apr;39:630–641. doi: 10.1172/JCI104078. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. PAGE E., SOLOMON A. K. Cat heart muscle in vitro. I. Cell volumes and intracellular concentrations in papillary muscle. J Gen Physiol. 1960 Nov;44:327–344. doi: 10.1085/jgp.44.2.327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. PEACHEY L. D., RASMUSSEN H. Structure of the toad's urinary bladder as related to its physiology. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1961 Aug;10:529–553. doi: 10.1083/jcb.10.4.529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. USSING H. H. The frog skin potential. J Gen Physiol. 1960 May;43:135–147. doi: 10.1085/jgp.43.5.135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. USSING H. H., ZERAHN K. Active transport of sodium as the source of electric current in the short-circuited isolated frog skin. Acta Physiol Scand. 1951 Aug 25;23(2-3):110–127. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1951.tb00800.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. ZERAHN K. Studies on the active transport of lithium in the isolated frog skin. Acta Physiol Scand. 1955 Aug 19;33(4):347–358. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1955.tb01214.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of General Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES