Skip to main content
The Journal of General Physiology logoLink to The Journal of General Physiology
. 1965 Mar 1;48(4):559–569. doi: 10.1085/jgp.48.4.559

Electrical Activity and Histological Change in the Degenerating Olfactory Epithelium

Sadayuki F Takagi 1, Toshi Yajima 1
PMCID: PMC2195437  PMID: 14324975

Abstract

Electrical activity and histological changes were studied in the degenerating olfactory epithelium of the bullfrog after the olfactory nerve had been sectioned. After nerve section, the electrical responses to odors disappeared in the olfactory epithelium in 8 days in the summer, in 11 days in the early autumn, and in 16 days in the early winter. In the degenerating olfactory epithelium a striking decrease in the number of olfactory cells was found, but not of supporting cells. The ratio of the number of olfactory cells to that of supporting cells was found to decrease from 5 or 6 to below 2 after the nerve section. At a ratio below 2, the electrical responses to odor disappeared. The histological changes in the bullfrog are compared with those in the mouse and rabbit. The localization of the olfactory pigment and the electrical activity of the supporting cell are discussed. It was concluded that all three types of responses to odors originate from the activity of the olfactory cell.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (777.4 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BRIGGS M. H., DUNCAN R. B. Odour receptors. Nature. 1961 Sep 23;191:1310–1311. doi: 10.1038/1911310a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. CLARK W. L. Inquiries into the anatomical basis of olfactory discrimination. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1957 May 7;146(924):299–319. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1957.0013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. HIGASHINO S., TAKAGI S. F. THE EFFECT OF ELECTROTONUS ON THE OLFACTORY EPITHELIUM. J Gen Physiol. 1964 Nov;48:323–335. doi: 10.1085/jgp.48.2.323. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. JACKSON R. T. The olfactory pigment. J Cell Comp Physiol. 1960 Apr;55:143–147. doi: 10.1002/jcp.1030550205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. MOULTON D. G. Pigment and the olfactory mechanism. Nature. 1962 Sep 29;195:1312–1313. doi: 10.1038/1951312a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. MOZELL M. M. Olfactory mucosal and neural responses in the frog. Am J Physiol. 1962 Aug;203:353–358. doi: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1962.203.2.353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. OTTOSON D. Sustained potentials evoked by olfactory stimulation. Acta Physiol Scand. 1954 Dec 31;32(4):384–386. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1954.tb01186.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. SHIBUYA T., TAKAGI S. F. ELECTRICAL RESPONSE AND GROWTH OF OLFACTORY CILIA OF THE OLFACTORY EPITHELIUM OF THE NEWT IN WATER AND ON LAND. J Gen Physiol. 1963 Sep;47:71–82. doi: 10.1085/jgp.47.1.71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Shibuya T. Dissociation of Olfactory Neural Response and Mucosal Potential. Science. 1964 Mar 20;143(3612):1338–1339. doi: 10.1126/science.143.3612.1338. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. TAKAGI S. F., SHIBUYA T. The electrical activity of the olfactory epithelium studied with micro- and macro-electrodes. Jpn J Physiol. 1960 Aug 15;10:385–395. doi: 10.2170/jjphysiol.10.385. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. TAKAGI S. F., YAJIMA T. ELECTRICAL RESPONSES TO ODOURS OF DEGENERATING OLFACOTRY EPITHELIUM. Nature. 1964 Jun 20;202:1220–1220. doi: 10.1038/2021220a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of General Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES