Skip to main content
The Journal of General Physiology logoLink to The Journal of General Physiology
. 1965 Nov 1;49(2):365–379. doi: 10.1085/jgp.49.2.365

The Spread of Excitation in the Embryonic Chick Heart

Melvyn Lieberman 1, Antonio Paes de Carvalho 1
PMCID: PMC2195477  PMID: 19873568

Abstract

The spread of excitation in embryonic chick hearts, ranging in age from 7 to 20 days, was studied with both intracellular and extracellular electrodes. Evidence that the delay in ventricular excitation could be attributed to the cells of the entire atrioventricular (AV) ring was obtained, in part, from sagittal sections of the heart. In the intact preparation, uniform propagation occurred throughout the atrial roof at an apparent conduction velocity of 0.4 to 0.5 meter/sec. Delay of impulse propagation was localized in a very narrow band of tissue which extended across the AV ring. The apparent conduction velocity of this tissue was between 0.003 and 0.005 meter/sec. Both normal and retrograde propagation revealed the spread of conduction across the AV ring to be decremental in nature. This finding was supported by high frequency stimulation experiments which gave rise to AV block localized in the cells of the AV ring. Cardiac rhythmicity and AV transmission were responsive to acetylcholine and norepinephrine in much the same manner as in the adult mammalian heart. The present findings are in support of the hypothesis that the embryonic AV ring is the functional counterpart of the adult AV node.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (893.4 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BOUCEK R. J., MURPHY W. P., Jr, PAFF G. H. Electrical and mechanical properties of chick embryo heart chambers. Circ Res. 1959 Sep;7:787–793. doi: 10.1161/01.res.7.5.787. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. DE CARVALHO A. P., DE MELLO W. C., HOFFMAN B. F. Electrophysiological evidence for specialized fiber types in rabbit atrium. Am J Physiol. 1959 Mar;196(3):483–488. doi: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1959.196.3.483. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. FINGL E., WOODBURY L. A., HECHT H. H. Effects of innervation and drugs upon direct membrane potentials of embryonic chick myocardium. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1952 Jan;104(1):103–114. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. PAESDECARVALHO A., LANGAN W. B. INFLUENCE OF EXTRACELLULAR POTASSIUM LEVELS ON ATRIOVENTRICULAR TRANSMISSION. Am J Physiol. 1963 Aug;205:375–381. doi: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1963.205.2.375. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. PAFF G. H., BOUCEK R. J., KLOPFENSTEIN H. S. EXPERIMENTAL HEART-BLOCK IN THE CHICK EMBRYO. Anat Rec. 1964 Jun;149:217–223. doi: 10.1002/ar.1091490205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. PATTEN B. M. The development of the sinoventricular conduction system. Med Bull (Ann Arbor) 1956 Jan;22(1):1–21. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. de CARVALHO A., de ALMEIDA D. Spread of activity through the atrioventricular node. Circ Res. 1960 Jul;8:801–809. doi: 10.1161/01.res.8.4.801. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of General Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES