Skip to main content
The Journal of General Physiology logoLink to The Journal of General Physiology
. 1966 Mar 1;49(4):717–725. doi: 10.1085/jgp.49.4.717

Cellular Electrophoretic Mobility and the Mitotic Cycle

E Mayhew 1
PMCID: PMC2195510  PMID: 5221375

Abstract

The electrophoretic mobility of RPMI No. 41 cells grown in suspension, parasynchronized by double thymidine blocking and cold shock, is reported. No. 41 cells have a higher electrophoretic mobility during the mitotic peak phase than at other times in the mitotic cycle. Treatment of parasynchronous cells by neuraminidase reduces the mobility to the same value irrespective of the stage of the cells in the mitotic cycle. The higher electrophoretic mobility of cells in mitotic peak phase is probably due to a higher surface charge density at this time, possibly caused by a higher concentration of ionized neuraminic acid carboxyl groups at the hydrodynamic shear layer. The mobility of nonsynchronous rapidly and slowly growing cells differs; neuraminidase reduces their mobility by proportionately similar amounts. The results suggest that the differences in mobility between rapidly and slowly growing cells cannot be accounted for exclusively by differences in the amount of neuraminic acid groups at the shear layer.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (540.2 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. ABERCROMBIE M., AMBROSE E. J. The surface properties of cancer cells: a review. Cancer Res. 1962 Jun;22:525–548. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. BANGHAM A. D., HEARD D. H., FLEMANS R., SEAMAN G. V. An apparatus for microelectrophoresis of small particles. Nature. 1958 Sep 6;182(4636):642–644. doi: 10.1038/182642a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. BOOTSMA D., BUDKE L., VOS O. STUDIES ON SYNCHRONOUS DIVISION OF TISSUE CULTURE CELLS INITIATED BY EXCESS THYMIDINE. Exp Cell Res. 1964 Jan;33:301–309. doi: 10.1016/s0014-4827(64)81035-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. COOK G. M., HEARD D. H., SEAMAN G. V. Sialic acids and the electrokinetic charge of the human erythrocyte. Nature. 1961 Jul 1;191:44–47. doi: 10.1038/191044a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. CURTIS A. S. Cell contact and adhesion. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 1962 Feb;37:82–129. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-185x.1962.tb01605.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. EISENBERG S., BEN-OR S., DOLJANSKI F. Electro-kinetic properties of cells in growth processes. I. The electrophoretic behavior of liver cells during regeneration and post-natal growth. Exp Cell Res. 1962 Mar;26:451–461. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(62)90151-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. ENGELBERG J. A method of measuring the degree of synchronization of cell populations. Exp Cell Res. 1961 Mar;23:218–227. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(61)90032-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. FORRESTER J. A., AMBROSE E. J., MACPHERSON J. A. Electrophoretic investigations of a clone of hamster fibroblasts and polyoma-transformed cells from the same population. Nature. 1962 Dec 15;196:1068–1070. doi: 10.1038/1961068a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. GOTTSCHALK A. Correlation between composition, structure, shape and function of a salivary mucoprotein. Nature. 1960 Jun 18;186:949–951. doi: 10.1038/186949a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. MITCHISON J. M. The growth of single cells. I. Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Exp Cell Res. 1957 Oct;13(2):244–262. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(57)90005-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. MOORE G. E., MOUNT D., TARA G., SCHWARTZ N. GROWTH OF HUMAN TUMOR CELLS IN SUSPENSION CULTURES. Cancer Res. 1963 Dec;23:1735–1741. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. NEWTON A. A., WILDY P. Parasynchronous division of HeLa cells. Exp Cell Res. 1959 Mar;16(3):624–635. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(59)90130-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. PRESCOTT D. M. Relations between cell growth and cell division. I. Reduced weight, cell volume, protein content, and nuclear volume of amoeba proteus from division to division. Exp Cell Res. 1955 Oct;9(2):328–337. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(55)90106-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Puck T. T. Phasing, Mitotic Delay, and Chromosomal Aberrations in Mammalian Cells. Science. 1964 May 1;144(3618):565–566. doi: 10.1126/science.144.3618.565-c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. SINCLAIR W. K., MORTON R. A. X-RAY AND ULTRAVIOLET SENSITIVITY OF SYNCHRONIZED CHINESE HAMSTER CELLS AT VARIOUS STAGES OF THE CELL CYCLE. Biophys J. 1965 Jan;5:1–25. doi: 10.1016/s0006-3495(65)86700-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. WALLACH D. F., DEPEREZESANDI M. V. SIALIC ACID AND THE ELECTROPHORETIC MOBILITY OF THREE TUMOR CELL TYPES. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1964 Nov 1;83:363–366. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. WEISS L. Sialic acid as a structural component of some mammalian tissue cell surfaces. Nature. 1961 Sep 9;191:1108–1109. doi: 10.1038/1911108b0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. WEISS L. The mammalian tissue cell surface. Biochem Soc Symp. 1963;22:32–54. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of General Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES