Skip to main content
PMC home page
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1995 Aug 2;130(4):929–939. doi: 10.1083/jcb.130.4.929

Kinetochore chemistry is sensitive to tension and may link mitotic forces to a cell cycle checkpoint

PMCID: PMC2199958  PMID: 7642708

Abstract

Some cells have a quality control checkpoint that can detect a single misattached chromosome and delay the onset of anaphase, thus allowing time for error correction. The mechanical error in attachment must somehow be linked to the chemical regulation of cell cycle progression. The 3F3 antibody detects phosphorylated kinetochore proteins that might serve as the required link (Gorbsky, G. J., and W. A. Ricketts. 1993. J. Cell Biol. 122:1311-1321). We show by direct micromanipulation experiments that tension alters the phosphorylation of kinetochore proteins. Tension, whether from a micromanipulation needle or from normal mitotic forces, causes dephosphorylation of the kinetochore proteins recognized by 3F3. If tension is absent, either naturally or as a result of chromosome detachment by micromanipulation, the proteins are phosphorylated. Equally direct experiments identify tension as the checkpoint signal: tension from a microneedle on a misattached chromosome leads to anaphase (Li, X., and R. B. Nicklas. 1995. Nature (Lond.). 373:630-632), and we show here that the absence of tension caused by detaching chromosomes from the spindle delays anaphase indefinitely. Thus, the absence of tension is linked to both kinetochore phosphorylation and delayed anaphase onset. We propose that the kinetochore protein dephosphorylation caused by tension is the all clear signal to the checkpoint. The evidence is circumstantial but rich. In any event, tension alters kinetochore chemistry. Very likely, tension affects chemistry directly, by altering the conformation of a tension-sensitive protein, which leads directly to dephosphorylation.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (3.9 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Ault J. G., Nicklas R. B. Tension, microtubule rearrangements, and the proper distribution of chromosomes in mitosis. Chromosoma. 1989 Jun;98(1):33–39. doi: 10.1007/BF00293332. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bernat R. L., Borisy G. G., Rothfield N. F., Earnshaw W. C. Injection of anticentromere antibodies in interphase disrupts events required for chromosome movement at mitosis. J Cell Biol. 1990 Oct;111(4):1519–1533. doi: 10.1083/jcb.111.4.1519. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Brinkley B. R., Ouspenski I., Zinkowski R. P. Structure and molecular organization of the centromere-kinetochore complex. Trends Cell Biol. 1992 Jan;2(1):15–21. doi: 10.1016/0962-8924(92)90139-e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Campbell M. S., Gorbsky G. J. Microinjection of mitotic cells with the 3F3/2 anti-phosphoepitope antibody delays the onset of anaphase. J Cell Biol. 1995 Jun;129(5):1195–1204. doi: 10.1083/jcb.129.5.1195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cyert M. S., Scherson T., Kirschner M. W. Monoclonal antibodies specific for thiophosphorylated proteins recognize Xenopus MPF. Dev Biol. 1988 Sep;129(1):209–216. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(88)90175-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Earnshaw W. C., Bernat R. L., Cooke C. A., Rothfield N. F. Role of the centromere/kinetochore in cell cycle control. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1991;56:675–685. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1991.056.01.076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Fernandez A., Brautigan D. L., Lamb N. J. Protein phosphatase type 1 in mammalian cell mitosis: chromosomal localization and involvement in mitotic exit. J Cell Biol. 1992 Mar;116(6):1421–1430. doi: 10.1083/jcb.116.6.1421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Gorbsky G. J. Kinetochores, microtubules and the metaphase checkpoint. Trends Cell Biol. 1995 Apr;5(4):143–148. doi: 10.1016/s0962-8924(00)88968-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Gorbsky G. J., Ricketts W. A. Differential expression of a phosphoepitope at the kinetochores of moving chromosomes. J Cell Biol. 1993 Sep;122(6):1311–1321. doi: 10.1083/jcb.122.6.1311. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hartwell L. H., Weinert T. A. Checkpoints: controls that ensure the order of cell cycle events. Science. 1989 Nov 3;246(4930):629–634. doi: 10.1126/science.2683079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hoyt M. A., Totis L., Roberts B. T. S. cerevisiae genes required for cell cycle arrest in response to loss of microtubule function. Cell. 1991 Aug 9;66(3):507–517. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(81)90014-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hudspeth A. J., Gillespie P. G. Pulling springs to tune transduction: adaptation by hair cells. Neuron. 1994 Jan;12(1):1–9. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(94)90147-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Jordan M. A., Toso R. J., Thrower D., Wilson L. Mechanism of mitotic block and inhibition of cell proliferation by taxol at low concentrations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 Oct 15;90(20):9552–9556. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.20.9552. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Li R., Murray A. W. Feedback control of mitosis in budding yeast. Cell. 1991 Aug 9;66(3):519–531. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(81)90015-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Li X., Nicklas R. B. Mitotic forces control a cell-cycle checkpoint. Nature. 1995 Feb 16;373(6515):630–632. doi: 10.1038/373630a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Minshull J., Sun H., Tonks N. K., Murray A. W. A MAP kinase-dependent spindle assembly checkpoint in Xenopus egg extracts. Cell. 1994 Nov 4;79(3):475–486. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90256-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Murray A. Cell cycle checkpoints. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1994 Dec;6(6):872–876. doi: 10.1016/0955-0674(94)90059-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Neff M. W., Burke D. J. A delay in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell cycle that is induced by a dicentric chromosome and dependent upon mitotic checkpoints. Mol Cell Biol. 1992 Sep;12(9):3857–3864. doi: 10.1128/mcb.12.9.3857. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Nicklas R. B., Arana P. Evolution and the meaning of metaphase. J Cell Sci. 1992 Aug;102(Pt 4):681–690. doi: 10.1242/jcs.102.4.681. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Nicklas R. B., Brinkley B. R., Pepper D. A., Kubai D. F., Rickards G. K. Electron microscopy of spermatocytes previously studied in life: methods and some observations on micromanipulated chromosomes. J Cell Sci. 1979 Feb;35:87–104. doi: 10.1242/jcs.35.1.87. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Nicklas R. B. Chance encounters and precision in mitosis. J Cell Sci. 1988 Mar;89(Pt 3):283–285. doi: 10.1242/jcs.89.3.283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Nicklas R. B. Chromosome micromanipulation. II. Induced reorientation and the experimental control of segregation in meiosis. Chromosoma. 1967;21(1):17–50. doi: 10.1007/BF00330545. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Nicklas R. B., Kubai D. F. Microtubules, chromosome movement, and reorientation after chromosomes are detached from the spindle by micromanipulation. Chromosoma. 1985;92(4):313–324. doi: 10.1007/BF00329815. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Nicklas R. B., Ward S. C. Elements of error correction in mitosis: microtubule capture, release, and tension. J Cell Biol. 1994 Sep;126(5):1241–1253. doi: 10.1083/jcb.126.5.1241. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Rieder C. L., Alexander S. P. Kinetochores are transported poleward along a single astral microtubule during chromosome attachment to the spindle in newt lung cells. J Cell Biol. 1990 Jan;110(1):81–95. doi: 10.1083/jcb.110.1.81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Rieder C. L., Davison E. A., Jensen L. C., Cassimeris L., Salmon E. D. Oscillatory movements of monooriented chromosomes and their position relative to the spindle pole result from the ejection properties of the aster and half-spindle. J Cell Biol. 1986 Aug;103(2):581–591. doi: 10.1083/jcb.103.2.581. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Rieder C. L., Schultz A., Cole R., Sluder G. Anaphase onset in vertebrate somatic cells is controlled by a checkpoint that monitors sister kinetochore attachment to the spindle. J Cell Biol. 1994 Dec;127(5):1301–1310. doi: 10.1083/jcb.127.5.1301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Rogers K. A., McKee N. H., Kalnins V. I. Preferential orientation of centrioles toward the heart in endothelial cells of major blood vessels is reestablished after reversal of a segment. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1985 May;82(10):3272–3276. doi: 10.1073/pnas.82.10.3272. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Skibbens R. V., Skeen V. P., Salmon E. D. Directional instability of kinetochore motility during chromosome congression and segregation in mitotic newt lung cells: a push-pull mechanism. J Cell Biol. 1993 Aug;122(4):859–875. doi: 10.1083/jcb.122.4.859. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Sluder G., Miller F. J., Thompson E. A., Wolf D. E. Feedback control of the metaphase-anaphase transition in sea urchin zygotes: role of maloriented chromosomes. J Cell Biol. 1994 Jul;126(1):189–198. doi: 10.1083/jcb.126.1.189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Spencer F., Hieter P. Centromere DNA mutations induce a mitotic delay in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Oct 1;89(19):8908–8912. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.19.8908. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Tomkiel J., Cooke C. A., Saitoh H., Bernat R. L., Earnshaw W. C. CENP-C is required for maintaining proper kinetochore size and for a timely transition to anaphase. J Cell Biol. 1994 May;125(3):531–545. doi: 10.1083/jcb.125.3.531. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Wang X. M., Yew N., Peloquin J. G., Vande Woude G. F., Borisy G. G. Mos oncogene product associates with kinetochores in mammalian somatic cells and disrupts mitotic progression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Aug 30;91(18):8329–8333. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.18.8329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Wendell K. L., Wilson L., Jordan M. A. Mitotic block in HeLa cells by vinblastine: ultrastructural changes in kinetochore-microtubule attachment and in centrosomes. J Cell Sci. 1993 Feb;104(Pt 2):261–274. doi: 10.1242/jcs.104.2.261. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Yen T. J., Compton D. A., Wise D., Zinkowski R. P., Brinkley B. R., Earnshaw W. C., Cleveland D. W. CENP-E, a novel human centromere-associated protein required for progression from metaphase to anaphase. EMBO J. 1991 May;10(5):1245–1254. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1991.tb08066.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Zirkle R. E. Ultraviolet-microbeam irradiation of newt-cell cytoplasm: spindle destruction, false anaphase, and delay of true anaphase. Radiat Res. 1970 Mar;41(3):516–537. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES