Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of General Physiology logoLink to The Journal of General Physiology
. 1968 Jan 1;51(1):13–27. doi: 10.1085/jgp.51.1.13

Filtration Coefficient of the Axon Membrane As Measured with Hydrostatic and Osmotic Methods

Fernando F Vargas 1
PMCID: PMC2201156  PMID: 5642470

Abstract

The hydraulic conductivity of the membranes surrounding the giant axon of the squid, Dosidicus gigas, was measured. In some axons the axoplasm was partially removed by suction. Perfusion was then established by insertion of a second pipette. In other axons the axoplasm was left intact and only one pipette was inserted. In both groups hydrostatic pressure was applied by means of a water column in a capillary manometer. Displacement of the meniscus in time gave the rate of fluid flowing across the axon sheath. In both groups osmotic differences across the membrane were established by the addition of a test molecule to the external medium which was seawater. The hydraulic conductivity determined by application of hydrostatic pressure was 10.6 ± 0.8.10-8 cm/sec cm H2O in perfused axons and 3.2 ± 0.6.10-8 cm/sec cm H2O in intact axons. When the driving force was an osmotic pressure gradient the conductivity was 4.5 ± 0.6 x 10-10 cm/sec cm H2O and 4.8 ± 0.9 x 10-10 cm/sec cm H2O in perfused and intact axons, respectively. A comparable result was found when the internal solution was made hyperosmotic. The fluid flow was a linear function of the hydrostatic pressure up to 70 cm of water. Glycerol outflux and membrane conductance were increased 1.6 and 1.1 times by the application of hydrostatic pressure. These increments do not give an explanation of the difference between the filtration coefficients. Other possible explanations are suggested and discussed.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (812.6 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. COULTER N. A., Jr Filtration coefficient of the capillaries of the brain. Am J Physiol. 1958 Nov;195(2):459–464. doi: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1958.195.2.459. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Fenstermacher J. D., Johnson J. A. Filtration and reflection coefficients of the rabbit blood-brain barrier. Am J Physiol. 1966 Aug;211(2):341–346. doi: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1966.211.2.341. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. SIDEL V. W., SOLOMON A. K. Entrance of water into human red cells under an osmotic pressure gradient. J Gen Physiol. 1957 Nov 20;41(2):243–257. doi: 10.1085/jgp.41.2.243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. TASAKII, WATANABE A., TAKENAKA T. Resting and action potential of intracellularly perfused squid giant axon. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1962 Jul 15;48:1177–1184. doi: 10.1073/pnas.48.7.1177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. VILLEGAS R., CAPUTO C., VILLEGAS L. Diffusion barrieres in the squid nerve fiber. The axolemma and the Schwann layer. J Gen Physiol. 1962 Nov;46:245–255. doi: 10.1085/jgp.46.2.245. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. VILLEGAS R., VILLEGAS G. M. Characterization of the membranes in the giant nerve fiber of the squid. J Gen Physiol. 1960 May;43:73–103. doi: 10.1085/jgp.43.5.73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Vargas F. F. Determination of the permeability to water of the membrane of axons from Dosidicus gigas. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1965 Sep 27;109(1):309–311. doi: 10.1016/0926-6585(65)90117-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. ZADUNAISKY J. A., PARISI M. N., MONTOREANO R. EFFECT OF ANTIDIURETIC HORMONE ON PERMEABILITY OF SINGLE MUSCLE FIBRES. Nature. 1963 Oct 26;200:365–366. doi: 10.1038/200365a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of General Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES