Skip to main content
The Journal of General Physiology logoLink to The Journal of General Physiology
. 1969 Feb 1;53(2):248–262. doi: 10.1085/jgp.53.2.248

Mechanisms of Accommodation in Different Types of Frog Neurons

S D Stoney Jr 1, Xenia Machne 1
PMCID: PMC2202902  PMID: 5764746

Abstract

Responses of individual spinal ganglion neurons, sympathetic ganglion neurons, and motoneurons of frogs to linearly rising currents were investigated utilizing microelectrodes for intracellular stimulation and recording. Spinal ganglion neurons exhibited rapid accommodation to linearly rising currents. Minimal current gradients (MCG's) required to excite these neurons (average value, 106 rheobases/sec) were of the same order of magnitude as for some nerve fibers. Although sympathetic ganglion neurons exhibited responses to lower current gradients than spinal ganglion neurons, distinct MCG's (average value, 26 rheobases/sec) could always be established. MCG's could not be detected in most motoneurons, even with current gradients as low as 0.6 rheobase/sec. A few motoneurons exhibited distinct MCG's (average value, 11 rheobases/sec). The failure of spinal ganglion neurons to respond to anything other than rapidly rising currents appears to be due primarily to the development of severe delayed rectification. The inability of sympathetic ganglion neurons to respond to low current gradients appears to depend not only on delayed rectification but also on increases in depolarization threshold. When present in motoneurons, accommodation appears to result from the same mechanisms responsible for its appearance in sympathetic ganglion neurons.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (917.7 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Hunt C. C., Riker W. K. Properties of frog sympathetic neurons in normal ganglia and after axon section. J Neurophysiol. 1966 Nov;29(6):1096–1114. doi: 10.1152/jn.1966.29.6.1096. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. ITO M. The electrical activity of spinal ganglion cells investigated with intracellular microelectrodes. Jpn J Physiol. 1957 Dec 20;7(4):297–323. doi: 10.2170/jjphysiol.7.297. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. SASAKI K., OKA H. ACCOMMODATION, LOCAL RESPONSE AND MEMBRANE POTENTIAL IN SPINAL MOTONEURONS OF THE CAT. Jpn J Physiol. 1963 Oct 15;13:508–522. doi: 10.2170/jjphysiol.13.508. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. SASAKI K., OTANI T. Accommodation in motoneurons as modified by circumstantial conditions. Jpn J Physiol. 1962 Aug 15;12:383–396. doi: 10.2170/jjphysiol.12.383. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. SASAKI K., OTANI T. Accommodation in spinal motoneurons of the cat. Jpn J Physiol. 1961 Aug 15;11:443–456. doi: 10.2170/jjphysiol.11.443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ushiyama J., Koizumi K., Brooks C. M. Accommodative reactions of neuronal elements in the spinal cord. J Neurophysiol. 1966 Nov;29(6):1028–1045. doi: 10.1152/jn.1966.29.6.1028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. VALLBO A. B. ACCOMMODATION OF SINGLE MYELINATED NERVE FIBRES FROM XENOPUS LAEVIS RELATED TO TYPE OF END ORGAN. Acta Physiol Scand. 1964 Aug;61:413–428. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. VALLBO A. B. ACCOMMODATION RELATED TO INACTIVATION OF THE SODIUM PERMEABILITY IN SINGLE MYELINATED NERVE FIBRES FROM XENOPUS LAEVIS. Acta Physiol Scand. 1964 Aug;61:429–444. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Yamashita H. Factors which decide the excitability of a spinal motoneuron in the cat. Jpn J Physiol. 1966 Dec 15;16(6):684–701. doi: 10.2170/jjphysiol.16.684. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of General Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES