Skip to main content
The Journal of General Physiology logoLink to The Journal of General Physiology
. 1972 Mar 1;59(3):247–269. doi: 10.1085/jgp.59.3.247

Dual Sensitivities of Cells in Wolf Spider Eyes at Ultraviolet and Visible Wavelengths of Light

Robert D DeVoe 1
PMCID: PMC2203179  PMID: 5058960

Abstract

Intracellular recordings have been made from visual cells in principal and secondary eyes of in vitro wolf spider preparations. The responses of all cells to all wavelengths of light were graded depolarizations; no hyperpolarizations or nerve discharges were seen. Cells in a secondary eye, the anterior lateral eye, had a maximum sensitivity in the visible at 510 nm and a secondary maximum, or shoulder, of sensitivity in the near ultraviolet at 380 nm. Cells in principal eyes, the anterior median eyes, all responded maximally both in the visible at 510 nm and in the ultraviolet at 360–370 nm or less. However, there was no typical ratio of ultraviolet to visible sensitivities; the differences in log sensitivities (log UV/VIS) varied from 3.3 to -0.5. Each principal eye had a population of cells with different ratios. These populations varied with the time of the year, possibly due to changes in light upon the animals. Chromatic adaptations of cells in anterior median (but not anterior lateral) eyes resulted in small, selective changes in spectral sensitivities, and there was some facilitation of responses from cells repeatedly stimulated. It is concluded that cells of secondary eyes contain only a visual pigment absorbing maximally in the visible, while cells of principal eyes probably contain variable amounts of both this pigment and one absorbing in the ultraviolet as well.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.3 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bridges C. D. Variability and relationships of fish visual pigments. Vision Res. 1966 Jun;5(5):239–251. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(65)90002-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. DARTNALL H. J. A. The interpretation of spectral sensitivity curves. Br Med Bull. 1953;9(1):24–30. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bmb.a074302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. DeVoe R. D., Small R. J., Zvargulis J. E. Spectral sensitivities of wolf spider eyes. J Gen Physiol. 1969 Jul;54(1):1–32. doi: 10.1085/jgp.54.1.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hamdorf K., Schwemer J., Gogala M. Insect visual pigment sensitive to ultraviolet light. Nature. 1971 Jun 18;231(5303):458–459. doi: 10.1038/231458a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. KOCH A. L. Some calculations on the turbidity of mitochondria and bacteria. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1961 Aug 19;51:429–441. doi: 10.1016/0006-3002(61)90599-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Land M. F. Structure of the retinae of the principal eyes of jumping spiders (Salticidae: dendryphantinae) in relation to visual optics. J Exp Biol. 1969 Nov;51(2):443–470. doi: 10.1242/jeb.51.2.443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. McEnroe W. D., Dronka K. Color vision in the adult female two-spotted spider mite. Science. 1966 Nov 11;154(3750):782–784. doi: 10.1126/science.154.3750.782-a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Melamed J., Trujillo-Cenóz O. The fine structure of the visual system of Lycosa (Araneae: Lycosidae). I. Retina and optic nerve. Z Zellforsch Mikrosk Anat. 1966;74(1):12–31. doi: 10.1007/BF00342937. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Nolte J., Brown J. E., Smith T. G., Jr A hyperpolarizing component of the receptor potential in the median ocellus of Limulus. Science. 1968 Nov 8;162(3854):677–679. doi: 10.1126/science.162.3854.677. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Nolte J., Brown J. E. The spectral sensitivities of single cells in the median ocellus of Limulus. J Gen Physiol. 1969 Nov;54(5):636–649. doi: 10.1085/jgp.54.5.636. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. RATHMAYER W. NEUROMUSCULAR TRANSMISSION IN A SPIDER AND THE EFFECT OF CALCIUM. Comp Biochem Physiol. 1965 Apr;14:673–687. doi: 10.1016/0010-406x(65)90254-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. RUCK P., JAHN T. L. Electrical studies on the compound eye of Ligia occidentalis Dana (Crustacea: Isopoda). J Gen Physiol. 1954 Jul 20;37(6):825–849. doi: 10.1085/jgp.37.6.825. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Shaw S. R. Interreceptor coupling in ommatidia of drone honeybee and locust compound eyes. Vision Res. 1969 Sep;9(9):999–1029. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(69)90044-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Stratten W. P., Ogden T. E. Spectral sensitivity of the barnacle, Balanus amphitrite. J Gen Physiol. 1971 Apr;57(4):435–447. doi: 10.1085/jgp.57.4.435. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Wasserman G. S. Limulus receptor action spectra. Vision Res. 1969 May;9(5):611–620. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(69)90023-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of General Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES