Abstract
Absorption spectra of visual screening pigments obtained in vitro with a microspectrophotometer using frozen sections are given for the insects Musca domestica, Phormia regina, Libellula luctuosa, Apis mellifera (worker honeybee only), Drosophila melanogaster (wild type only) and the arachnids Lycosa baltimoriana and Lycosa miami. The spectral range covered is 260–700 nm for Lycosa and Drosophila and 310–700 nm for the remainder of the arthropods. A complete description of the instrumentation is given. For the flies, Phormia and Musca, light absorption by the yellow and red pigments is high from 310 to about 610 nm. This implies that for these insects there should be no wavelength shift in electroretinogram (ERG) results due to light leakage among neighboring ommatidia for this wavelength range. The same comment applies to Calliphora erythrocephala, which is known to have similar screening pigments. For some of the insects studied a close correspondence is noted between screening pigment absorption spectra and spectral sensitivity curves for individual photoreceptors, available in the literature. In some cases the screening pigment absorption spectra can be related to chemical extraction results, with the general observation that some of the in vitro absorption peaks are shifted to the red. The Lycosa, Apis, and Libellula dark red pigments absorb strongly over a wide spectral range and therefore prevent chemical identification.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.1 MB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- BUTENANDT A., BIEKERT E., LINZEN B. Uber Ommochrome. XIV. Zur Verberitung der Ommine im Tierreich. Hoppe Seylers Z Physiol Chem. 1958;313:251–258. doi: 10.1515/bchm2.1958.313.1.251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bloom S. E., Buss E. G., Strother G. K. Cytological and Cytophotometric Analysis of Binucleated Red Blood Cell Mutants (bn) in Turkeys (MELEAGRIS GALLOPAVO). Genetics. 1970 May;65(1):51–63. doi: 10.1093/genetics/65.1.51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- DeVoe R. D., Small R. J., Zvargulis J. E. Spectral sensitivities of wolf spider eyes. J Gen Physiol. 1969 Jul;54(1):1–32. doi: 10.1085/jgp.54.1.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- GOLDSMITH T. H. The nature of the retinal action potential, and the spectral sensitivities of ultraviolet and green receptor systems of the compound eye of the worker honey-bee. J Gen Physiol. 1960 Mar;43:775–799. doi: 10.1085/jgp.43.4.775. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Goldsmith T. H., Fernandez H. R. The sensitivity of housefly photoreceptors in the mid-ultraviolet and the limits of the visible spectrum. J Exp Biol. 1968 Dec;49(3):669–677. doi: 10.1242/jeb.49.3.669. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Langer H., Thorell B. Microspectrophotometry of single rhabdomeres in the insect eye. Exp Cell Res. 1966 Mar;41(3):673–677. doi: 10.1016/s0014-4827(66)80119-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ruck P. The Components of the Visual System of a Dragonfly. J Gen Physiol. 1965 Nov 1;49(2):289–307. doi: 10.1085/jgp.49.2.289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Strother G. K. Absorption of Musca domestica Screening Pigment. J Gen Physiol. 1966 May 1;49(5):1087–1088. doi: 10.1085/jgp.49.5.1087. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- WOLKEN J. J., MELLON A. D., CONTIS G. Photoreceptor structures. II. Drosophila melanogaster. J Exp Zool. 1957 Mar;134(2):383–409. doi: 10.1002/jez.1401340210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]