Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of General Physiology logoLink to The Journal of General Physiology
. 1973 Mar 1;61(3):273–289. doi: 10.1085/jgp.61.3.273

Adaptation in the Ventral Eye of Limulus is Functionally Independent of the Photochemical Cycle, Membrane Potential, and Membrane Resistance

A Fein 1, R D DeVoe 1
PMCID: PMC2203457  PMID: 4689620

Abstract

The early receptor potential (ERP), membrane potential, membrane resistance, and sensitivity were measured during light and/or dark adaptation in the ventral eye of Limulus. After a bright flash, the ERP amplitude recovered with a time constant of 100 ms, whereas the sensitivity recovered with an initial time constant of 20 s. When a strong adapting light was turned off, the recovery of membrane potential and of membrane resistance had time-courses similar to each other, and both recovered more rapidly than the sensitivity. The receptor depolarization was compared during dark adaptation after strong illumination and during light adaptation with weaker illumination; at equal sensitivities the cell was more depolarized during light adaptation than during dark adaptation. Finally, the waveforms of responses to flashes were compared during dark adaptation after strong illumination and during light adaptation with weaker illumination. At equal sensitivities (equal amplitude responses for identical flashes), the responses during light adaptation had faster time-courses than the responses during dark adaptation. Thus neither the photochemical cycle nor the membrane potential nor the membrane resistance is related to sensitivity changes during dark adaptation in the photoreceptors of the ventral eye. By elimination, these results imply that there are (unknown) intermediate process(es) responsible for adaptation interposed between the photochemical cycle and the electrical properties of the photoreceptor.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (886.0 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BROWN K. T., MURAKAMI M. A NEW RECEPTOR POTENTIAL OF THE MONKEY RETINA WITH NO DETECTABLE LATENCY. Nature. 1964 Feb 8;201:626–628. doi: 10.1038/201626a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Boynton R. M., Whitten D. N. Visual adaptation in monkey cones: recordings of late receptor potentials. Science. 1970 Dec 25;170(3965):1423–1426. doi: 10.1126/science.170.3965.1423. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Brindley G. S., Gardner-Medwin A. R. The origin of the early receptor potential of the retina. J Physiol. 1966 Jan;182(1):185–194. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1966.sp007817. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Brown J. E., Murray J. R., Smith T. G. Photoelectric potential from photoreceptor cells in ventral eye of Limulus. Science. 1967 Nov 3;158(3801):665–666. doi: 10.1126/science.158.3801.665. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. CONE R. A. EARLY RECEPTOR POTENTIAL OF THE VERTEBRATE RETINA. Nature. 1964 Nov 21;204:736–739. doi: 10.1038/204736a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Clark A. W., Millecchia R., Mauro A. The ventral photoreceptor cells of Limulus. I. The microanatomy. J Gen Physiol. 1969 Sep;54(3):289–309. doi: 10.1085/jgp.54.3.289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cone R. A., Cobbs W. H., 3rd Rhodopsin cycle in the living eye of the rat. Nature. 1969 Mar 1;221(5183):820–822. doi: 10.1038/221820a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. DOWLING J. E. NEURAL AND PHOTOCHEMICAL MECHANISMS OF VISUAL ADAPTATION IN THE RAT. J Gen Physiol. 1963 Jul;46:1287–1301. doi: 10.1085/jgp.46.6.1287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. DeVoe R. D. A nonlinear model for transient responses from light-adapted wolf spider eyes. J Gen Physiol. 1967 Sep;50(8):1993–2030. doi: 10.1085/jgp.50.8.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. DeVoe R. D., Small R. J., Zvargulis J. E. Spectral sensitivities of wolf spider eyes. J Gen Physiol. 1969 Jul;54(1):1–32. doi: 10.1085/jgp.54.1.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Donner K. O., Reuter T. Dark-adaptation processes in the rhodopsin rods of the frog's retina. Vision Res. 1967 Jan;7(1):17–41. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(67)90023-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Dowling J. E., Ripps H. Visual adaptation in the retina of the skate. J Gen Physiol. 1970 Oct;56(4):491–520. doi: 10.1085/jgp.56.4.491. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. FUORTES M. G., HODGKIN A. L. CHANGES IN TIME SCALE AND SENSITIVITY IN THE OMMATIDIA OF LIMULUS. J Physiol. 1964 Aug;172:239–263. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1964.sp007415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Glantz R. M. Visual adaptation: a case of nonlinear summation. Vision Res. 1972 Jan;12(1):103–109. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(72)90140-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Grabowski S. R., Pinto L. H., Pak W. L. Adaptation in retinal rods of axolotl: intracellular recordings. Science. 1972 Jun 16;176(4040):1240–1243. doi: 10.1126/science.176.4040.1240. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. HAGINS W. A., ZONANA H. V., ADAMS R. G. Local membrane current in the outer segments of squid photoreceptors. Nature. 1962 Jun 2;194:844–847. doi: 10.1038/194844a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Hagins W. A. Electrical signs of information flow in photoreceptors. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1965;30:403–418. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1965.030.01.040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Hagins W. A. The visual process: Excitatory mechanisms in the primary receptor cells. Annu Rev Biophys Bioeng. 1972;1:131–158. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bb.01.060172.001023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Lisman J. E., Brown J. E. The effects of intracellular iontophoretic injection of calcium and sodium ions on the light response of Limulus ventral photoreceptors. J Gen Physiol. 1972 Jun;59(6):701–719. doi: 10.1085/jgp.59.6.701. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Millecchia R., Mauro A. The ventral photoreceptor cells of Limulus. II. The basic photoresponse. J Gen Physiol. 1969 Sep;54(3):310–330. doi: 10.1085/jgp.54.3.310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Murray G. C. Intracellular absorption difference spectrum of Limulus extra-ocular photolabile pigment. Science. 1966 Dec 2;154(3753):1182–1183. doi: 10.1126/science.154.3753.1182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Pinter R. B. Sinusoidal and delta function responses of visual cells of the Limulus eye. J Gen Physiol. 1966 Jan;49(3):565–593. doi: 10.1085/jgp.49.3.565. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Seldin E. B., White R. H., Brown P. K. Spectral sensitivity of larval mosquito ocelli. J Gen Physiol. 1972 Apr;59(4):415–420. doi: 10.1085/jgp.59.4.415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Stieve H. Interpretation of the generator potential in terms of ionic processes. (Experiments with the light sensory cells of Limulus and the hermit crab). Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1965;30:451–456. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1965.030.01.044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. WALD G., BROWN P. K. The molar extinction of rhodopsin. J Gen Physiol. 1953 Nov 20;37(2):189–200. doi: 10.1085/jgp.37.2.189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Wald G. Visual excitation and blood clotting. Science. 1965 Nov 19;150(3699):1028–1030. doi: 10.1126/science.150.3699.1028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of General Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES