Skip to main content
PMC home page
The Journal of General Physiology logoLink to The Journal of General Physiology
. 1973 May 1;61(5):572–587. doi: 10.1085/jgp.61.5.572

Electrophysiological Control of Reversed Ciliary Beating in Paramecium

Hans Machemer 1, Roger Eckert 1
PMCID: PMC2203482  PMID: 4705638

Abstract

Quantitative relations between ciliary reversal and membrane responses were examined in electrically stimulated paramecia. Specimens bathed in 1 mM CaCl2, 1 mM KCl, and 1 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.2, were filmed at 250 frames per second while depolarizing current pulses were injected. At current intensities producing only electrotonic shifts the cilia failed to respond. Stimuli which elicited a regenerative response were followed by a period of reversed ciliary beating. With increasing stimulus intensities the latency of ciliary reversal dropped from 30 to 4 ms or less, and the duration of reversal increased from 50 ms to 2.4 s or more; the corresponding regenerative responses increased in amplitude and rate of rise. With progressively larger intracellular positive pulses, electric stimulation became less effective, producing responses with a progressive increase in latency and decrease in duration of reversed beating of the cilia. When 100-ms pulses shifted the membrane potential to +70 mV or more, ciliary reversal was suppressed until the end of the pulse. "Off" responses then occurred with a latency of 2–4 ms independent of further increases in positive potential displacement. These results suggest that ciliary reversal is coupled to membrane depolarization by the influx of ions which produces the regenerative depolarization of the surface membrane. According to this view suppression of the ciliary response during stimulation occurs when the membrane potential approaches the equilibrium potential of the coupling ion, thereby retarding its influx. Previous data together with the present findings suggest that this ion is Ca2+.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (880.8 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Baker P. F., Hodgkin A. L., Ridgway E. B. Depolarization and calcium entry in squid giant axons. J Physiol. 1971 Nov;218(3):709–755. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1971.sp009641. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Eckert R. Bioelectric control of ciliary activity. Science. 1972 May 5;176(4034):473–481. doi: 10.1126/science.176.4034.473. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Eckert R., Naitoh Y., Friedman K. Sensory mechanisms in Paramecium. I. Two components of the electric response to mechanical stimulation of the anterior surface. J Exp Biol. 1972 Jun;56(3):683–694. doi: 10.1242/jeb.56.3.683. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Eckert R., Naitoh Y. Passive electrical properties of Paramecium and problems of ciliary coordination. J Gen Physiol. 1970 Apr;55(4):467–483. doi: 10.1085/jgp.55.4.467. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. FATT P., GINSBORG B. L. The ionic requirements for the production of action potentials in crustacean muscle fibres. J Physiol. 1958 Aug 6;142(3):516–543. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1958.sp006034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. FATT P., KATZ B. The electrical properties of crustacean muscle fibres. J Physiol. 1953 Apr 28;120(1-2):171–204. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1953.sp004884. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. HODGKIN A. L. Ionic movements and electrical activity in giant nerve fibres. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1958 Jan 1;148(930):1–37. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1958.0001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Katz B., Miledi R. A study of synaptic transmission in the absence of nerve impulses. J Physiol. 1967 Sep;192(2):407–436. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1967.sp008307. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Katz B., Miledi R. Tetrodotoxin-resistant electric activity in presynaptic terminals. J Physiol. 1969 Aug;203(2):459–487. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1969.sp008875. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kinosita H., Murakami A. Control of ciliary motion. Physiol Rev. 1967 Jan;47(1):53–82. doi: 10.1152/physrev.1967.47.1.53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kung C., Eckert R. Genetic modification of electric properties in an excitable membrane (paramecium-calcium conductance-electrophysiological measurements-membrane mutant). Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1972 Jan;69(1):93–97. doi: 10.1073/pnas.69.1.93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Naito Y., Kaneko H. Reactivated triton-extracted models o paramecium: modification of ciliary movement by calcium ions. Science. 1972 May 5;176(4034):523–524. doi: 10.1126/science.176.4034.523. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Naitoh Y., Eckert R., Friedman K. A regenerative calcium response in Paramecium. J Exp Biol. 1972 Jun;56(3):667–681. doi: 10.1242/jeb.56.3.667. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Naitoh Y., Eckert R. Ionic mechanisms controlling behavioral responses of paramecium to mechanical stimulation. Science. 1969 May 23;164(3882):963–965. doi: 10.1126/science.164.3882.963. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Naitoh Y. Ionic control of the reversal response of cilia in Paramecium caudatum. A calcium hypothesis. J Gen Physiol. 1968 Jan;51(1):85–103. doi: 10.1085/jgp.51.1.85. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. PORTZEHL H., CALDWELL P. C., RUEEGG J. C. THE DEPENDENCE OF CONTRACTION AND RELAXATION OF MUSCLE FIBRES FROM THE CRAB MAIA SQUINADO ON THE INTERNAL CONCENTRATION OF FREE CALCIUM IONS. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1964 May 25;79:581–591. doi: 10.1016/0926-6577(64)90224-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of General Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES