Skip to main content
PMC home page
The Journal of General Physiology logoLink to The Journal of General Physiology
. 1974 Feb 1;63(2):214–234. doi: 10.1085/jgp.63.2.214

Frequency Characteristics of Retinal Neurons in the Carp

Jun-Ichi Toyoda 1
PMCID: PMC2203547  PMID: 4812636

Abstract

Frequency characteristics of various retinal neurons in the carp were studied using sinusoidally modulated light as an input. They were affected by both intensity and pattern of illumination. In the horizontal cells, in which the effect of light intensity was studied most extensively, an increase in the light intensity brought about a decrease of the gain, which was more marked at lower frequencies, resulting in a shift of cutoff frequency towards higher frequencies and in a slight low frequency attenuation. A decrease in the area illuminated had an effect similar to a decrease in the light intensity. In the receptor, the low frequency attenuation was not apparent even at high light intensities. The adaptation process in receptors was not sufficient to explain the low frequency attenuation in the horizontal cells, and a possible contribution of negative feedback from horizontal cells to receptors was suggested. In the bipolar cell, the lateral interaction played an important role. An increase in an area resulted in the suppression of the response at low frequencies where the phases of the center and the surround responses were opposed, but in the augmentation near 5 Hz where the two responses were in phase. In amacrine cells, a low frequency attenuation and a phase advance at low frequencies were very prominent, and were considered to be due mainly to a process designated here as the neural adaptation.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.2 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Baylor D. A., Fuortes M. G., O'Bryan P. M. Receptive fields of cones in the retina of the turtle. J Physiol. 1971 Apr;214(2):265–294. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1971.sp009432. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cervetto L., MacNichol E. F., Jr Inactivation of horizontal cells in turtle retina by glutamate and aspartate. Science. 1972 Nov 17;178(4062):767–768. doi: 10.1126/science.178.4062.767. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. DE LANGE DZN H. Research into the dynamic nature of the human fovea-cortex systems with intermittent and modulated light. I. Attenuation characteristics with white and colored light. J Opt Soc Am. 1958 Nov;48(11):777–784. doi: 10.1364/josa.48.000777. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. FUORTES M. G., HODGKIN A. L. CHANGES IN TIME SCALE AND SENSITIVITY IN THE OMMATIDIA OF LIMULUS. J Physiol. 1964 Aug;172:239–263. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1964.sp007415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Fiorentini A., Maffei L. Transfer characteristics of excitation and inhibition in the human visual system. J Neurophysiol. 1970 Mar;33(2):285–292. doi: 10.1152/jn.1970.33.2.285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hughes G. W., Maffei L. Retinal ganglion cell response to sinusoidal light stimulation. J Neurophysiol. 1966 May;29(3):333–352. doi: 10.1152/jn.1966.29.3.333. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. KELLY D. H. Visual response to time-dependent stimuli. I. Amplitude sensitivity measurements. J Opt Soc Am. 1961 Apr;51:422–429. doi: 10.1364/josa.51.000422. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kaneko A., Hashimoto H. Recording site of the single cone response determined by an electrode marking technique. Vision Res. 1967 Nov;7(11):847–851. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(67)90005-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kaneko A. Physiological and morphological identification of horizontal, bipolar and amacrine cells in goldfish retina. J Physiol. 1970 May;207(3):623–633. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1970.sp009084. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kaneko A., Yamada M. S-potentials in the dark-adapted retina of the carp. J Physiol. 1972 Dec;227(1):261–273. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1972.sp010031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Knight B. W., Toyoda J. I., Dodge F. A., Jr A quantitative description of the dynamics of excitation and inhibition in the eye of Limulus. J Gen Physiol. 1970 Oct;56(4):421–437. doi: 10.1085/jgp.56.4.421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Maffei L., Cervetto L., Fiorentini A. Transfer characteristics of excitation and inhibition in cat retinal ganglion cells. J Neurophysiol. 1970 Mar;33(2):276–284. doi: 10.1152/jn.1970.33.2.276. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Marmarelis P. Z., Naka K. I. Nonlinear analysis and synthesis of receptive-field responses in the catfish retina. 3. Two-input white-noise analysis. J Neurophysiol. 1973 Jul;36(4):634–648. doi: 10.1152/jn.1973.36.4.634. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Murakami M., Kaneko A. Differentiation of P 3 subcomponents in cold-blooded vertebrate retinas. Vision Res. 1966 Dec;6(12):627–636. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(66)90074-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Murakami M., Otsu K., Otsuka T. Effects of chemicals on receptors and horizontal cells in the retina. J Physiol. 1972 Dec;227(3):899–913. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1972.sp010065. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Naka K. I., Rushton W. A. S-potentials from luminosity units in the retina of fish (Cyprinidae). J Physiol. 1966 Aug;185(3):587–599. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1966.sp008003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Pinter R. B. Sinusoidal and delta function responses of visual cells of the Limulus eye. J Gen Physiol. 1966 Jan;49(3):565–593. doi: 10.1085/jgp.49.3.565. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Ratliff F., Knight B. W., Graham N. On tuning and amplification by lateral inhibition. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1969 Mar;62(3):733–740. doi: 10.1073/pnas.62.3.733. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Ratliff F., Knight B. W., Toyoda J., Hartline H. K. Enhancement of flicker by lateral inhibition. Science. 1967 Oct 20;158(3799):392–393. doi: 10.1126/science.158.3799.392. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Roufs J. A. Dynamic properties of vision. I. Experimental relationships between flicker and flash thresholds. Vision Res. 1972 Feb;12(2):261–278. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(72)90117-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Schellart N. A., Spekreijse H. Dynamic characteristics of retinal ganglion cell responses in goldfish. J Gen Physiol. 1972 Jan;59(1):1–21. doi: 10.1085/jgp.59.1.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Spekreijse H., Norton A. L. The dynamic characteristics of color-coded S-potentials. J Gen Physiol. 1970 Jul;56(1):1–15. doi: 10.1085/jgp.56.1.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Spekreijse H. Rectification in the goldfish retina: analysis by sinusoidal and auxiliary stimulation. Vision Res. 1969 Dec;9(12):1461–1472. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(69)90062-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Stell W. K. The structure and relationships of horizontal cells and photoreceptor-bipolar synaptic complexes in goldfish retina. Am J Anat. 1967 Sep;121(2):401–423. doi: 10.1002/aja.1001210213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Tomita T., Kaneko A., Murakami M., Pautler E. L. Spectral response curves of single cones in the carp. Vision Res. 1967 Jul;7(7):519–531. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(67)90061-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Toyoda J., Hashimoto H., Otsu K. Bipolar-amacrine transmission in the carp retina. Vision Res. 1973 Feb;13(2):295–307. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(73)90108-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Toyoda J. Membrane resistance changes underlying the bipolar cell response in the carp retina. Vision Res. 1973 Feb;13(2):283–294. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(73)90107-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Werblin F. S., Dowling J. E. Organization of the retina of the mudpuppy, Necturus maculosus. II. Intracellular recording. J Neurophysiol. 1969 May;32(3):339–355. doi: 10.1152/jn.1969.32.3.339. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of General Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES