Skip to main content
PMC home page
The Journal of General Physiology logoLink to The Journal of General Physiology
. 1974 Feb 1;63(2):187–213. doi: 10.1085/jgp.63.2.187

Intestinal Transport of Weak Electrolytes

Evidence in Favor of a Three-Compartment System

Michael J Jackson 1, Yih-Fu Shiau 1, Susan Bane 1, Margaret Fox 1
PMCID: PMC2203550  PMID: 4812635

Abstract

A study has been made of the transmural fluxes of benzoic, phenylacetic, and pentanoic acids, benzylamine, hexylamine, and D-amphetamine across rat jejunum incubated in vitro. The M to S fluxes of the weak acids were greater than their corresponding S to M fluxes, and the S to M fluxes of the weak bases were larger than their M to S fluxes. These patterns of asymmetric movements were observed when the transmural electrical potential difference was clamped at 0 mV, and when the pH values of the mucosal and serosal fluids were identical. The effects of a weak acid on the fluxes of other weak electrolytes were qualitatively similar when the effector weak acid was added to the mucosal fluid, and when it was added to the serosal fluid. But the effects of a weak base on the fluxes of other weak electrolytes were dependent upon its location, and the interactions observed when the effector weak base was added to the mucosal fluid were qualitatively different than those seen when it was added to the serosal fluid. The interactions between weak electrolytes could readily be explained in terms of the function of a system of three compartments in series, in which the pH of the intermediate compartment is greater than that of the bulk phases. But these observations could not be explained in terms of an analogous system involving an intermediate compartment of low pH, or in terms of a carrier mediated system. The transport function of the three-compartment system can be described in the form of an equation, and it is found that a pH difference of less than 0.5 unit may explain our observations on weak electrolyte transport.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.5 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Barry R. J., Eggenton J. Membrane potentials of epithelial cells in rat small intestine. J Physiol. 1972 Dec;227(1):201–216. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1972.sp010027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Barry R. J., Smyth D. H., Wright E. M. Short-circuit current and solute transfer by rat jejunum. J Physiol. 1965 Nov;181(2):410–431. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1965.sp007770. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bloch R., Haberich F. J., Lorenz-Meyer H. Untersuchungen zur Transport-Kinetik mittelkettiger Fettsäuren am Dünndarm. (In vitro- und in vivo-Versuche an Ratten. Pflugers Arch. 1972;335(3):198–212. doi: 10.1007/BF00592157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Butler T. C. Active transport of 5,5-dimethyl-2,4-oxazolidinedione. Science. 1966 Mar 25;151(3717):1564–1564. doi: 10.1126/science.151.3717.1564. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Diamond J. M. Standing-gradient model of fluid transport in epithelia. Fed Proc. 1971 Jan-Feb;30(1):6–13. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Frizzell R. A., Schultz S. G. Ionic conductances of extracellular shunt pathway in rabbit ileum. Influence of shunt on transmural sodium transport and electrical potential differences. J Gen Physiol. 1972 Mar;59(3):318–346. doi: 10.1085/jgp.59.3.318. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. HOGBEN C. A., TOCCO D. J., BRODIE B. B., SCHANKER L. S. On the mechanism of intestinal absorption of drugs. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1959 Apr;125(4):275–282. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Lifson N., Hakim A. A. Simple diffusive-convective model for intestinal absorption of a nonelectrolyte (urea). Am J Physiol. 1966 Nov;211(5):1137–1146. doi: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1966.211.5.1137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Lippe C., Bianchi A., Cremaschi D., Capraro V. Different types of asymmetric distribution of hydrosoluble and liposoluble substances at the two sides of a mucosal intestinal preparation. Arch Int Physiol Biochim. 1965 Jan;73(1):43–54. doi: 10.3109/13813456509079330. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Lyon I., Sheerin H. E. Studies on transmural potentials in vitro in relation to intestinal absorption. VI. The effect of sugars on electrical potential profiles in jejunum and ileum. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1971 Oct 12;249(1):1–14. doi: 10.1016/0005-2736(71)90078-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Rose R. C., Schultz S. G. Studies on the electrical potential profile across rabbit ileum. Effects of sugars and amino acids on transmural and transmucosal electrical potential differences. J Gen Physiol. 1971 Jun;57(6):639–663. doi: 10.1085/jgp.57.6.639. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. SCHANKER L. S., TOCCO D. J., BRODIE B. B., HOGBEN C. A. Absorption of drugs from the rat small intestine. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1958 May;123(1):81–88. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. SCHULTZ S. G., ZALUSKY R. ION TRANSPORT IN ISOLATED RABBIT ILEUM. I. SHORT-CIRCUIT CURRENT AND NA FLUXES. J Gen Physiol. 1964 Jan;47:567–584. doi: 10.1085/jgp.47.3.567. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Schulz I., Ströver F., Ullrich K. J. Lipid soluble weak organic acid buffers as "substrate" for pancreatic secretion. Pflugers Arch. 1971;323(2):121–140. doi: 10.1007/BF00586444. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Suzuki E., Tsukigi M., Muranishi S., Sezaki H., Kakemi K. The absorption from the gut of quinine and chlorpheniramine given with various anionic agents. J Pharm Pharmacol. 1972 Feb;24(2):138–144. doi: 10.1111/j.2042-7158.1972.tb08946.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Ullrich K. J., Radtke H. W., Rumrich G. The role of bicarbonate and other buffers on isotonic fluid absorption in the proximal convolution of the rat kidney. Pflugers Arch. 1971;330(2):149–161. doi: 10.1007/BF00643031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Vaidhyanathan V. S. Influence of complex formation on drug transport. J Pharm Sci. 1972 Jun;61(6):894–900. doi: 10.1002/jps.2600610613. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. WHITTEMBURY G., SUGINO N., SOLOMON A. K. Ionic permeability and electrical potential differences in Necturus kidney cells. J Gen Physiol. 1961 Mar;44:689–712. doi: 10.1085/jgp.44.4.689. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. WILBRANDT W., ROSENBERG T. The concept of carrier transport and its corollaries in pharmacology. Pharmacol Rev. 1961 Jun;13:109–183. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. WILSON T. H., KAZYAK L. Acid-base changes across the wall of hamster and rat intestine. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1957 Apr;24(1):124–132. doi: 10.1016/0006-3002(57)90154-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Waddell W. J., Bates R. G. Intracellular pH. Physiol Rev. 1969 Apr;49(2):285–329. doi: 10.1152/physrev.1969.49.2.285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Wright E. M. Mechanisms of ion transport across the choroid plexus. J Physiol. 1972 Oct;226(2):545–571. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1972.sp009997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of General Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES