Skip to main content
PMC home page
The Journal of General Physiology logoLink to The Journal of General Physiology
. 1974 Apr 1;63(4):460–491. doi: 10.1085/jgp.63.4.460

Impedance of Frog Skeletal Muscle Fibers in Various Solutions

R Valdiosera 1, C Clausen 1, R S Eisenberg 1
PMCID: PMC2203562  PMID: 4544879

Abstract

The linear circuit parameters of 140 muscle fibers in nine solutions are determined from phase measurements fitted with three circuit models: the disk model, in which the resistance to radial current flow is in the lumen of the tubules; the lumped model, in which the resistance is at the mouth of the tubules; and the hybrid model, in which it is in both places. The lumped model fails to fit the data. The disk and hybrid model fit the data, but the optimal circuit values of the hybrid model seem more reasonable. The circuit values depend on sarcomere length. The conductivity of the lumen of the tubules is less than, and varies in a nonlinear manner with, the conductivity of the bathing solution, suggesting that the tubules are partially occluded by some material like basement membrane which restricts the mobility of ions and has fixed charge. The x2.5 hypertonic sucrose solution used in many voltage clamp experiments produces a large increase in the radial resistance, suggesting that control of the potential across the tubular membranes would be difficult to achieve. Glycerol-treated fibers have 90% of their tubular system insulated from the extracellular solution and 10% connected to the extracellular solution through a high resistance. We discuss the implications of our results for calculations of the nonlinear properties of muscle fibers, including the action potential and the radial spread of contraction.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.8 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Adrian R. H., Almers W. Measurement of membrane capacity in skeletal muscle. Nat New Biol. 1973 Mar 14;242(115):62–64. doi: 10.1038/newbio242062a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Adrian R. H., Chandler W. K., Hodgkin A. L. The kinetics of mechanical activation in frog muscle. J Physiol. 1969 Sep;204(1):207–230. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1969.sp008909. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Adrian R. H., Chandler W. K., Hodgkin A. L. Voltage clamp experiments in striated muscle fibres. J Physiol. 1970 Jul;208(3):607–644. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1970.sp009139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bezanilla F., Caputo C., Gonzalez-Serratos H., Venosa R. A. Sodium dependence of the inward spread of activation in isolated twitch muscle fibres of the frog. J Physiol. 1972 Jun;223(2):507–523. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1972.sp009860. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Costantin L. L. The role of sodium current in the radial spread of contraction in frog muscle fibers. J Gen Physiol. 1970 Jun;55(6):703–715. doi: 10.1085/jgp.55.6.703. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Davey D. F. The effect of fixative tonicity on the myosin filament lattice volume of frog muscle fixed following exposure to normal or hypertonic Ringer. Histochem J. 1973 Jan;5(1):87–104. doi: 10.1007/BF01012048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Dulhunty A. F., Gage P. W. Electrical properties of toad sartorius muscle fibres in summer and winter. J Physiol. 1973 May;230(3):619–641. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1973.sp010208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Eisenberg B., Eisenberg R. S. Selective disruption of the sarcotubular system in frog sartorius muscle. A quantitative study with exogenous peroxidase as a marker. J Cell Biol. 1968 Nov;39(2):451–467. doi: 10.1083/jcb.39.2.451. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Eisenberg R. S., Gage P. W. Ionic conductances of the surface and transverse tubular membranes of frog sartorius fibers. J Gen Physiol. 1969 Mar;53(3):279–297. doi: 10.1085/jgp.53.3.279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. FALK G., FATT P. LINEAR ELECTRICAL PROPERTIES OF STRIATED MUSCLE FIBRES OBSERVED WITH INTRACELLULAR ELECTRODES. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1964 Apr 14;160:69–123. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1964.0030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Flitney F. W. The volume of the T-system and its association with the sarcoplasmic reticulum in slow muscle fibres of the frog. J Physiol. 1971 Aug;217(1):243–257. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1971.sp009569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Freygang W. H., Jr, Rapoport S. I., Peachey L. D. Some relations between changes in the linear electrical properties of striated muscle fibers and changes in ultrastructure. J Gen Physiol. 1967 Nov;50(10):2437–2458. doi: 10.1085/jgp.50.10.2437. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Gage P. W., Eisenberg R. S. Capacitance of the surface and transverse tubular membrane of frog sartorius muscle fibers. J Gen Physiol. 1969 Mar;53(3):265–278. doi: 10.1085/jgp.53.3.265. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Gordon A. M., Godt R. E. Some effects of hypertonic solutions on contraction and excitation-contraction coupling in frog skeletal muscles. J Gen Physiol. 1970 Feb;55(2):254–275. doi: 10.1085/jgp.55.2.254. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. HODGKIN A. L. A note on conduction velocity. J Physiol. 1954 Jul 28;125(1):221–224. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1954.sp005152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Hodgkin A. L., Nakajima S. Analysis of the membrane capacity in frog muscle. J Physiol. 1972 Feb;221(1):121–136. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1972.sp009743. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Hodgkin A. L., Nakajima S. The effect of diameter on the electrical constants of frog skeletal muscle fibres. J Physiol. 1972 Feb;221(1):105–120. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1972.sp009742. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Howell J. N. A lesion of the transverse tubules of skeletal muscle. J Physiol. 1969 May;201(3):515–533. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1969.sp008770. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Krolenko S. A. Changes in the T-system of muscle fibres under the influence of influx and efflux of glycerol. Nature. 1969 Mar 8;221(5184):966–968. doi: 10.1038/221966a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. MARTIN A. R. The effect of change in length on conduction velocity in muscle. J Physiol. 1954 Jul 28;125(1):215–220. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1954.sp005151. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Nakajima S., Nakajima Y., Peachey L. D. Speed of repolarization and morphology of glygerol-treated frog muscle fibres. J Physiol. 1973 Oct;234(2):465–480. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1973.sp010355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Peachey L. D. The sarcoplasmic reticulum and transverse tubules of the frog's sartorius. J Cell Biol. 1965 Jun;25(3 Suppl):209–231. doi: 10.1083/jcb.25.3.209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Schneider M. F., Chandler W. K. Voltage dependent charge movement of skeletal muscle: a possible step in excitation-contraction coupling. Nature. 1973 Mar 23;242(5395):244–246. doi: 10.1038/242244a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Schneider M. F. Linear electrical properties of the transverse tubules and surface membrane of skeletal muscle fibers. J Gen Physiol. 1970 Nov;56(5):640–671. doi: 10.1085/jgp.56.5.640. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Valdiosera R., Clausen C., Eisenberg R. S. Circuit models of the passive electrical properties of frog skeletal muscle fibers. J Gen Physiol. 1974 Apr;63(4):432–459. doi: 10.1085/jgp.63.4.432. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Valdiosera R., Clausen C., Eisenberg R. S. Measurement of the impedance of frog skeletal muscle fibers. Biophys J. 1974 Apr;14(4):295–315. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(74)85917-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Vaughan P. C., Howell J. N., Eisenberg R. S. The capacitance of skeletal muscle fibers in solutions of low ionic strength. J Gen Physiol. 1972 Mar;59(3):347–359. doi: 10.1085/jgp.59.3.347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of General Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES