Skip to main content
The Journal of General Physiology logoLink to The Journal of General Physiology
. 1974 May 1;63(5):579–589. doi: 10.1085/jgp.63.5.579

A Nonlinearity in the Inhibitory Interactions in the Lateral Eye of Limulus

Robert B Barlow Jr 1, G David Lange 1
PMCID: PMC2203564  PMID: 4824997

Abstract

Receptor units in the eye of the horseshoe crab are more sensitive to lateral inhibition at some levels of excitation than they are at others. As a result, the steady-state inhibition of the response of a given unit is not directly proportional to the response levels of neighboring units. This effect may be represented by the introduction of a nonlinearity in the Hartline-Ratliff system of equations. The nonlinear inhibitory effect appears to increase the operating range of the receptor units.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (609.7 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BARLOW H. B., FITZHUGH R., KUFFLER S. W. Change of organization in the receptive fields of the cat's retina during dark adaptation. J Physiol. 1957 Aug 6;137(3):338–354. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1957.sp005817. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Barlow H. B., Levick W. R. Changes in the maintained discharge with adaptation level in the cat retina. J Physiol. 1969 Jun;202(3):699–718. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1969.sp008836. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Barlow R. B., Jr Inhibitory fields in the Limulus lateral eye. J Gen Physiol. 1969 Sep;54(3):383–396. doi: 10.1085/jgp.54.3.383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. HARTLINE H. K., RATLIFF F. Inhibitory interaction of receptor units in the eye of Limulus. J Gen Physiol. 1957 Jan 20;40(3):357–376. doi: 10.1085/jgp.40.3.357. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. HARTLINE H. K., RATLIFF F. Spatial summation of inhibitory influences in the eye of Limulus, and the mutual interaction of receptor units. J Gen Physiol. 1958 May 20;41(5):1049–1066. doi: 10.1085/jgp.41.5.1049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. HARTLINE H. K., WAGNER H. G., RATLIFF F. Inhibition in the eye of Limulus. J Gen Physiol. 1956 May 20;39(5):651–673. doi: 10.1085/jgp.39.5.651. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Knight B. W., Toyoda J. I., Dodge F. A., Jr A quantitative description of the dynamics of excitation and inhibition in the eye of Limulus. J Gen Physiol. 1970 Oct;56(4):421–437. doi: 10.1085/jgp.56.4.421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Milkman N., Schoenfeld R. L. A digital programmer for stimuli and computer control in neurophysiological experiments. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1966 Jan 31;128(3):861–875. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1965.tb11704.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. SCHOENFELD R. L. THE ROLE OF A DIGITAL COMPUTER AS A BIOLOGICAL INSTRUMENT. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1964 Jul 31;115:915–942. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. TOMITA T. Mechanism of lateral inhibition in eye of Limulus. J Neurophysiol. 1958 Sep;21(5):419–429. doi: 10.1152/jn.1958.21.5.419. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of General Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES