Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of General Physiology logoLink to The Journal of General Physiology
. 1974 Jun 1;63(6):740–756. doi: 10.1085/jgp.63.6.740

Fast Electrical Potential from a Long-Lived, Long-Wavelength Photoproduct of Fly Visual Pigment

William L Pak 1, Kellie J Lidington 1
PMCID: PMC2203578  PMID: 4829527

Abstract

A rapid electrical potential, which we have named the M-potential, can be obtained from the Drosophila eye using a high energy flash stimulus. The potential can be elicited from the normal fly, but it is especially prominent in the mutant norp AP12 (a phototransduction mutant), particularly if the eye color pigments are genetically removed from the eye. Several lines of evidence suggest that the M-potential arises from photoexcitation of long-lived metarhodopsin. Photoexcitation of rhodopsin does not produce a comparable potential. The spectral sensitivity of the M-potential peaks at about 575 nm. The M-potential pigment (metarhodopsin) can be shown to photoconvert back and forth with a "silent pigment(s)" absorbing maximally at about 485 nm. The silent pigment presumably is rhodopsin. These results support the recent spectrophotometric findings that dipteran metarhodopsin absorbs at much longer wavelengths than rhodopsin. The M-potential probably is related to the photoproduct component of the early receptor potential (ERP). Two major differences between the M-potential and the classical ERP are: (a) Drosophila rhodopsin does not produce a rapid photoresponse, and (b) an anesthetized or freshly sacrificed animal does not yield the M-potential. As in the case of the ERP, the M-potential appears to be a response associated with a particular state of the fly visual pigment. Therefore, it should be useful in in vivo investigations of the fly visual pigment, about which little is known.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1,020.1 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Arden G. B., Ikeda H., Siegel I. M. New components of the mammalian receptor potential and their relation to visual photochemistry. Vision Res. 1966 Aug;6(7):373–384. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(66)90047-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. BROWN K. T., MURAKAMI M. A NEW RECEPTOR POTENTIAL OF THE MONKEY RETINA WITH NO DETECTABLE LATENCY. Nature. 1964 Feb 8;201:626–628. doi: 10.1038/201626a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cone R. A., Cobbs W. H., 3rd Rhodopsin cycle in the living eye of the rat. Nature. 1969 Mar 1;221(5183):820–822. doi: 10.1038/221820a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cone R. A. Early receptor potential: photoreversible charge displacement in rhodopsin. Science. 1967 Mar 3;155(3766):1128–1131. doi: 10.1126/science.155.3766.1128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Deland M. C., Pak W. L. Reversibly temperature sensitive phototransduction mutant of Drosophila melanogaster. Nat New Biol. 1973 Aug 8;244(136):184–186. doi: 10.1038/newbio244184a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ebrey T. G. The thermal decay of the intermediates of rhodopsin in situ. Vision Res. 1968 Aug;8(8):965–982. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(68)90071-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Eckert H. Spectral sensitivities of receptor systems in the eye of the fly Musca. Naturwissenschaften. 1972 Feb;59(2):80–81. doi: 10.1007/BF00593475. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Fein A., Cone R. A. Limulus rhodopsin: rapid return of transient intermediates to the thermally stable state. Science. 1973 Nov 2;182(4111):495–497. doi: 10.1126/science.182.4111.495. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Fouchard R., Carricaburu P. La réponse electrorétinographique oscillante chez cinq espèces de mouches. Vision Res. 1970 Aug;10(8):655–669. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(70)90013-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Gedney C., Ward J., Ostroy S. E. Isolation and study of rhodopsin and cone responses in the frog retina. Am J Physiol. 1971 Dec;221(6):1754–1759. doi: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1971.221.6.1754. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Goldsmith T. H., Fernandez H. R. The sensitivity of housefly photoreceptors in the mid-ultraviolet and the limits of the visible spectrum. J Exp Biol. 1968 Dec;49(3):669–677. doi: 10.1242/jeb.49.3.669. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Goldstein E. B. Cone pigment regeneration in the isolated frog retina. Vision Res. 1970 Oct;10(10):1065–1068. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(70)90082-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Goldstein E. B., Wolf B. M. Regeneration of the green-rod pigment in the isolated frog retina. Vision Res. 1973 Mar;13(3):527–534. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(73)90022-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hagins W. A., McGaughy R. E. Molecular and thermal origins of fast photoelectric effects in the squid retina. Science. 1967 Aug 18;157(3790):813–816. doi: 10.1126/science.157.3790.813. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hillman P., Hochstein S., Minke B. A visual pigment with two physiologically active stable states. Science. 1972 Mar 31;175(4029):1486–1488. doi: 10.1126/science.175.4029.1486. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Hochstein S., Minke B., Hillman P. Antagonistic components of the late receptor potential in the barnacle photoreceptor arising from different stages of the pigment process. J Gen Physiol. 1973 Jul;62(1):105–128. doi: 10.1085/jgp.62.1.105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Hotta Y., Benzer S. Abnormal electroretinograms in visual mutants of Drosophila. Nature. 1969 Apr 26;222(5191):354–356. doi: 10.1038/222354a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Hotta Y., Benzer S. Genetic dissection of the Drosophila nervous system by means of mosaics. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1970 Nov;67(3):1156–1163. doi: 10.1073/pnas.67.3.1156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Langer H., Thorell B. Microspectrophotometry of single rhabdomeres in the insect eye. Exp Cell Res. 1966 Mar;41(3):673–677. doi: 10.1016/s0014-4827(66)80119-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. McCann G. D., Arnett D. W. Spectral and polarization sensitivity of the dipteran visual system. J Gen Physiol. 1972 May;59(5):534–558. doi: 10.1085/jgp.59.5.534. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Minke B., Hochstein S., Hillman P. Early receptor potential evidence for the existence of two thermally stable states in the barnacle visual pigment. J Gen Physiol. 1973 Jul;62(1):87–104. doi: 10.1085/jgp.62.1.87. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Nolte J., Brown J. E., Smith T. G., Jr A hyperpolarizing component of the receptor potential in the median ocellus of Limulus. Science. 1968 Nov 8;162(3854):677–679. doi: 10.1126/science.162.3854.677. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Nolte J., Brown J. E. Ultraviolet-induced sensitivity to visible light in ultraviolet receptors of Limulus. J Gen Physiol. 1972 Feb;59(2):186–200. doi: 10.1085/jgp.59.2.186. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Pak W. L., Boes R. J. Rhodopsin: responses from transient intermediates formed during its bleaching. Science. 1967 Mar 3;155(3766):1131–1133. doi: 10.1126/science.155.3766.1131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Pak W. L., Grossfield J., Arnold K. S. Mutants of the visual pathway of Drosophila melanogaster. Nature. 1970 Aug 1;227(5257):518–520. doi: 10.1038/227518b0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Pak W. L., Grossfield J., White N. V. Nonphototactic mutants in a study of vision of Drosophila. Nature. 1969 Apr 26;222(5191):351–354. doi: 10.1038/222351a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Pak W. L. Some properties of the early electrical response in the vertebrate retina. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1965;30:493–499. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1965.030.01.047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Stark W. S., Wasserman G. S. Transient and receptor potentials in the electroretinogram of Drosophila. Vision Res. 1972 Oct;12(10):1771–1775. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(72)90049-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of General Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES