Skip to main content
The Journal of General Physiology logoLink to The Journal of General Physiology
. 1965 May 1;48(5):919–931. doi: 10.1085/jgp.48.5.919

Electrical and Mechanical Responses in Deep Abdominal Extensor Muscles of Crayfish and Lobster

Bernard C Abbott 1, I Parnas 1
PMCID: PMC2213769  PMID: 14324996

Abstract

Electrical and mechanical studies have been made of the deep abdominal extensor muscles, medial (DEAM) and lateral (DEAL), of crayfish and lobster. The medial muscle responds to direct (intracellular) and indirect stimulation with a transient membrane depolarization which exhibits the properties of a propagated non-decremental action potential but does not overshoot the zero level. The amplitude is about 30 mv in crayfish and 50 mv in lobster. It is followed by a fast all-or-none twitch whose duration at 20°C is 30 to 50 msec. and whose developed tension is 500 gm/cm2 or about half the tetanic value. Membrane potential is K+-dependent and immersion in high K+ induces a brief transient tension rise as in other twitch-type muscles. The action potential and twitch are normal even if all external Na+ is replaced with sucrose but vary with external Ca++, the action potential increasing 8 to 10 mv for a twofold increase in Ca++. The lateral muscle (DEAL) is much slower and responds to intracellular stimulation only with an electrotonic or a local response. Mechanical responses and relaxation speeds are slow with minimal duration of contraction of 0.5 to 2 seconds. Immersion in high K solutions induces large maintained tensions. Sarcomere length in the fast DEAM is uniform and about 2 µ at rest, but in the DEAL speed is less and sarcomere length is greater averaging about 4.5 µ but with a mixed population of fibers.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (734.2 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BULBRING E., KURIYAMA H. Effects of changes in the external sodium and calcium concentrations on spontaneous electrical activity in smooth muscle of guinea-pig taenia coli. J Physiol. 1963 Apr;166:29–58. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1963.sp007089. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. FATT P., GINSBORG B. L. The ionic requirements for the production of action potentials in crustacean muscle fibres. J Physiol. 1958 Aug 6;142(3):516–543. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1958.sp006034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. FATT P., KATZ B. The electrical properties of crustacean muscle fibres. J Physiol. 1953 Apr 28;120(1-2):171–204. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1953.sp004884. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. GINSBORG B. L. Spontaneous activity in muscle fibres of the chick. J Physiol. 1960 Mar;150:707–717. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1960.sp006413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. HAGIWARA S., CHICHIBU S., NAKA K. I. THE EFFECTS OF VARIOUS IONS ON RESTING AND SPIKE POTENTIALS OF BARNACLE MUSCLE FIBERS. J Gen Physiol. 1964 Sep;48:163–179. doi: 10.1085/jgp.48.1.163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. HAGIWARA S., NAKA K. I., CHICHIBU S. MEMBRANE PROPERTIES OF BARNACLE MUSCLE FIBER. Science. 1964 Mar 27;143(3613):1446–1448. doi: 10.1126/science.143.3613.1446. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. HODGKIN A. L., HOROWICZ P. Potassium contractures in single muscle fibres. J Physiol. 1960 Sep;153:386–403. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1960.sp006541. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. HOYLE G., SMYTH T., Jr NEUROMUSCULAR PHYSIOLOGY OF GIANT MUSCLE FIBERS OF A BARNACLE, BALANUS NUBILUS DARWIN. Comp Biochem Physiol. 1963 Dec;10:291–314. doi: 10.1016/0010-406x(63)90229-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. HOYLE G., WIERSMA C. A. Coupling of membrane potential to contraction in crustacean muscles. J Physiol. 1958 Oct 31;143(3):441–453. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1958.sp006070. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. HOYLE G., WIERSMA C. A. Excitation at neuromuscular junctions in Crustacea. J Physiol. 1958 Oct 31;143(3):403–425. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1958.sp006068. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. HOYLE G., WIERSMA C. A. Inhibition at neuromuscular junctions in Crustacea. J Physiol. 1958 Oct 31;143(3):426–440. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1958.sp006069. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. KUFFLER S. W., VAUGHAN WILLIAMS E. M. Properties of the 'slow' skeletal muscles fibres of the frog. J Physiol. 1953 Aug;121(2):318–340. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1953.sp004949. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. ORKAND R. K. Chemical inhibition of contraction in directly stimulated crayfish muscle fibres. J Physiol. 1962 Oct;164:103–115. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1962.sp007005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. ORKAND R. K. The relation between membrane potential and contraction in single crayfish muscle fibres. J Physiol. 1962 Apr;161:143–159. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1962.sp006878. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. TAKEUCHI A., TAKEUCHI N. THE EFFECT ON CRAYFISH MUSCLE OF IONTOPHORETICALLY APPLIED GLUTAMATE. J Physiol. 1964 Mar;170:296–317. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1964.sp007332. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of General Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES