Skip to main content
The Journal of General Physiology logoLink to The Journal of General Physiology
. 1972 Jan 1;59(1):92–102. doi: 10.1085/jgp.59.1.92

Biophysical Effects of Adrenaline on the Smooth Muscle of the Rabbit Common Carotid Artery

F Mekata 1, H Niu 1
PMCID: PMC2213786  PMID: 5007265

Abstract

Effects of adrenaline on the smooth muscle of the rabbit common carotid artery were studied by the partitional chamber method. The experiments on excitation-contraction coupling were carried out in isotonic Krebs solution; the other experiments were carried out in hypertonic Krebs solution. Adrenaline (10-7 g/ml) caused rhythmical electrical and mechanical activity of arterial strips in isotonic Krebs solution. By addition of adrenaline (10-5 g/ml), the membrane was depolarized by about 10 mv and the amplitude of the electrotonic potential was decreased by 40–50% of the control in hypertonic Krebs solution. Present experimental results suggest that the depolarization of the membrane and the decrease of the amplitude of the electrotonic potential in the artery are due to the increase of Na and Cl conductance. Contraction appeared in all preparations exposed to 10-8 g/ml adrenaline; at that concentration membrane potential and membrane resistance showed little or no change.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (662.8 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bülbring E., Tomita T. Increase of membrane conductance by adrenaline in the smooth muscle of guinea-pig taenia coli. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1969 Mar 11;172(1027):89–102. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1969.0013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. KEATINGE W. R. MECHANISM OF ADRENERGIC STIMULATION OF MAMMALIAN ARTERIES AND ITS FAILURE AT LOW TEMPERATURES. J Physiol. 1964 Nov;174:184–205. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1964.sp007481. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Kuriyama H., Mekata F. Biophysical properties of the longitudinal smooth muscle of the guinea-pig rectum. J Physiol. 1971 Feb;212(3):667–683. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1971.sp009349. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Kuriyama H., Osa T., Tasaki H. Electrophysiological studies of the antrum muscle fibers of the guinea pig stomach. J Gen Physiol. 1970 Jan;55(1):48–62. doi: 10.1085/jgp.55.1.48. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Kuriyama H., Osa T., Toida N. Effect of tetrodotoxin on smooth muscle cells of the guinea-pig taenia coli. Br J Pharmacol Chemother. 1966 Aug;27(2):366–376. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1966.tb01668.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kuriyama H., Osa T., Toida N. Nervous factors influencing the membrane activity of intestinal smooth muscle. J Physiol. 1967 Jul;191(2):257–270. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1967.sp008249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Mekata F. Electrophysiological studies of the smooth muscle cell membrane of the rabbit common carotid artery. J Gen Physiol. 1971 Jun;57(6):738–751. doi: 10.1085/jgp.57.6.738. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Su C., Bevan J. A. The electrical response of pulmonary artery muscle to acetylcholine, histamine and serotonin. Life Sci. 1965 May;4(10):1025–1029. doi: 10.1016/0024-3205(65)90221-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Tomita T. Electrical responses of smooth muscle to external stimulation in hypertonic solution. J Physiol. 1966 Mar;183(2):450–468. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1966.sp007876. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. WAUGH W. H. Adrenergic stimulation of depolarized arterial muscle. Circ Res. 1962 Aug;11:264–276. doi: 10.1161/01.res.11.2.264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of General Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES