Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Canadian Family Physician logoLink to Canadian Family Physician
. 2003 Apr;49:462–468.

How are family physicians managing osteoporosis? Qualitative study of their experiences and educational needs.

Susan B Jaglal 1, June Carroll 1, Gillian Hawker 1, Warren J McIsaac 1, Liisa Jaakkimainen 1, Suzanne M Cadarette 1, Cathy Cameron 1, Dave Davis 1
PMCID: PMC2214200  PMID: 12729242

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To explore family physicians' experiences and perceptions of osteoporosis and to identify their educational needs in this area. DESIGN: Qualitative study using focus groups. SETTING: Four Ontario sites: one each in Thunder Bay and Timmins, and two in Toronto, chosen to represent a range of practice sizes, populations, locations, and use of bone densitometry. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-two FPs participated in four focus groups. Physicians were identified by investigators or local contacts to provide maximum variation sampling. METHOD: Focus groups using a semistructured interview guide were audiotaped and transcribed. The constant comparative method of data analysis was used to identify key words and concepts until saturation of themes was reached. MAIN FINDINGS: Family physicians order bone densitometry and try to manage osteoporosis appropriately, but lack a rationale for testing and are confused about management. Participants' main concern was clinical management, followed by disease prevention and their educational needs. CONCLUSION: Family physicians are confused about how to manage osteoporosis. To reduce the burden of illness due to osteoporosis, educational interventions should be tailored to family physicians' needs.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (176.6 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bero L. A., Grilli R., Grimshaw J. M., Harvey E., Oxman A. D., Thomson M. A. Closing the gap between research and practice: an overview of systematic reviews of interventions to promote the implementation of research findings. The Cochrane Effective Practice and Organization of Care Review Group. BMJ. 1998 Aug 15;317(7156):465–468. doi: 10.1136/bmj.317.7156.465. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Blumenthal D. The variation phenomenon in 1994. N Engl J Med. 1994 Oct 13;331(15):1017–1018. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199410133311511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Davis D. A., Taylor-Vaisey A. Translating guidelines into practice. A systematic review of theoretic concepts, practical experience and research evidence in the adoption of clinical practice guidelines. CMAJ. 1997 Aug 15;157(4):408–416. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Davis D. A., Thomson M. A., Oxman A. D., Haynes R. B. Changing physician performance. A systematic review of the effect of continuing medical education strategies. JAMA. 1995 Sep 6;274(9):700–705. doi: 10.1001/jama.274.9.700. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Fitt N. S., Mitchell S. L., Cranney A., Gulenchyn K., Huang M., Tugwell P. Influence of bone densitometry results on the treatment of osteoporosis. CMAJ. 2001 Mar 20;164(6):777–781. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Jaglal S. B., McIsaac W. J., Hawker G., Jaakkimainen L., Cadarette S. M., Chan B. T. Patterns of use of the bone mineral density test in Ontario, 1992-1998. CMAJ. 2000 Oct 31;163(9):1139–1143. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kanis J. A., Delmas P., Burckhardt P., Cooper C., Torgerson D. Guidelines for diagnosis and management of osteoporosis. The European Foundation for Osteoporosis and Bone Disease. Osteoporos Int. 1997;7(4):390–406. doi: 10.1007/BF01623782. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Marci C. D., Anderson W. B., Viechnicki M. B., Greenspan S. L. Bone mineral densitometry substantially influences health-related behaviors of postmenopausal women. Calcif Tissue Int. 2000 Feb;66(2):113–118. doi: 10.1007/s002230010024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Papaioannou A., Parkinson W., Adachi J., O'Connor A., Jolly E. E., Tugwell P., Bédard M. Women's decisions about hormone replacement therapy after education and bone densitometry. CMAJ. 1998 Nov 17;159(10):1253–1257. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Phelps C. E., Parente S. T. Priority setting in medical technology and medical practice assessment. Med Care. 1990 Aug;28(8):703–723. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199008000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Phillipov G., Mos E., Scinto S., Phillips P. J. Initiation of hormone replacement therapy after diagnosis of osteoporosis by bone densitometry. Osteoporos Int. 1997;7(2):162–164. doi: 10.1007/BF01623693. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Rubin S. M., Cummings S. R. Results of bone densitometry affect women's decisions about taking measures to prevent fractures. Ann Intern Med. 1992 Jun 15;116(12 Pt 1):990–995. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-116-12-990. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Ryan P. J., Harrison R., Blake G. M., Fogelman I. Compliance with hormone replacement therapy (HRT) after screening for post menopausal osteoporosis. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1992 Apr;99(4):325–328. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1992.tb13732.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Saadi H., Litaker D., Mills W., Kippes C., Richmond B., Licata A. Practice variation in the diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis: a case for more effective physician education in primary care. J Womens Health Gend Based Med. 1999 Jul-Aug;8(6):767–771. doi: 10.1089/152460999319093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Sackett D. L., Rosenberg W. M., Gray J. A., Haynes R. B., Richardson W. S. Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't. BMJ. 1996 Jan 13;312(7023):71–72. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7023.71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Sahota O., Worley A., Hosking D. J. An audit of current clinical practice in the management of osteoporosis in Nottingham. J Public Health Med. 2000 Dec;22(4):466–472. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/22.4.466. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Schrager S., Plane M. B., Mundt M. P., Stauffacher E. A. Osteoporosis prevention counseling during health maintenance examinations. J Fam Pract. 2000 Dec;49(12):1099–1103. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Silverman S. L., Greenwald M., Klein R. A., Drinkwater B. L. Effect of bone density information on decisions about hormone replacement therapy: a randomized trial. Obstet Gynecol. 1997 Mar;89(3):321–325. doi: 10.1016/S0029-7844(97)85857-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Solomon D. H., Levin E., Helfgott S. M. Patterns of medication use before and after bone densitometry: factors associated with appropriate treatment. J Rheumatol. 2000 Jun;27(6):1496–1500. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Taylor J. C., Sterkel B., Utley M., Shipley M., Newman S., Horton M., Fitz-Clarence H. Opinions and experiences in general practice on osteoporosis prevention, diagnosis and management. Osteoporos Int. 2001;12(10):844–848. doi: 10.1007/s001980170035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Tellier V., De Maeseneer J., De Prins L., Sedrine W. B., Gosset C., Reginster J. Y. Intensive and prolonged health promotion strategy may increase awareness of osteoporosis among postmenopausal women. Osteoporos Int. 2001;12(2):131–135. doi: 10.1007/s001980170145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Torgerson D. J., Thomas R. E., Campbell M. K., Reid D. M. Randomized trial of osteoporosis screening. Use of hormone replacement therapy and quality-of-life results. Arch Intern Med. 1997 Oct 13;157(18):2121–2125. doi: 10.1001/archinte.157.18.2121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Werner P., Vered I. Management of osteoporosis: a survey of Israeli physicians' knowledge and attitudes. Isr Med Assoc J. 2000 May;2(5):361–364. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Canadian Family Physician are provided here courtesy of College of Family Physicians of Canada

RESOURCES