Skip to main content
The Journal of General Physiology logoLink to The Journal of General Physiology
. 1975 Feb 1;65(2):119–134. doi: 10.1085/jgp.65.2.119

Slow PIII component of the carp electroretinogram

PMCID: PMC2214870  PMID: 1117278

Abstract

The slow PIII component of the electroretinogram (ERG) was studied in the isolated, aspartate-treated carp retina. Although the latter is richly populated with cones, slow PIII appeared to reflect almost exclusively the activity of rods; e.g. the spectral sensitivity of the potential paralleled closely the rod pigment curve, its operating range (i.e. the V-log I curve) was limited to 3 log units above absolute threshold, and raising background intensities to photopic levels produced saturation of the increment threshold function without evidence of a cone-mediated segment. Only after bleaching away a significant fraction of the porphyropsin was it possible to unmask a small photopic contribution to slow PIII, as evidenced by a displacement in the action spectrum to longer wavelengths. The spatial distribution of the slow PIII voltage within the retina (Faber, D.S. 1969. Ph.D. Thesis. State University of New York. Buffalo, N.Y.; Witkovsky, P.J. Nelson, and H. Ripps. 1973. J. Gen Physiol. 61:401) and its ability to survive aspartate treatment indicate that this potential arises in the Muller (glial) fiber. Additional support for this conclusion is provided by the slow rise time (several seconds) and long temporal integration (up to 40s) of the response. In many respects the properties of slow PIII resemble those of the c-wave, a pigment epithelial response also subserved by rod activity. On the other hand, the receptoral (fast PIII) and the b-wave components of the ERG behave quite differently. Unlike slow PIII, response saturation could not be induced, since both potentials are subserved by cones when the stimulus conditions exceed the limits of the scotopic range. Receptors appear to govern light adaptation at photopic background levels; both fast PIII and b-wave manifest identical incremental threshold values over this range of intensities. However, under scotopic conditions, the sensitivity of the b-wave is affected by luminous backgrounds too weak to alter fast PIII threshold, indicating a postreceptoral stage of adaptation.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1,021.4 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Ames A., 3rd, Pollen D. A. Neurotransmission in central nervous tissue: a study of isolated rabbit retina. J Neurophysiol. 1969 May;32(3):424–442. doi: 10.1152/jn.1969.32.3.424. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. BROWN K. T., WATANABE K. NEURAL STAGE OF ADAPTATION BETWEEN THE RECEPTORS AND INNER NUCLEAR LAYER OF MONKEY RETINA. Science. 1965 May 21;148(3673):1113–1115. doi: 10.1126/science.148.3673.1113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Baylor D. A., Fuortes M. G., O'Bryan P. M. Receptive fields of cones in the retina of the turtle. J Physiol. 1971 Apr;214(2):265–294. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1971.sp009432. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Baylor D. A., Hodgkin A. L. Detection and resolution of visual stimuli by turtle photoreceptors. J Physiol. 1973 Oct;234(1):163–198. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1973.sp010340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Baylor D. A., Nicholls J. G. After-effects of nerve impulses on signalling in the central nervous system of the leech. J Physiol. 1969 Aug;203(3):571–589. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1969.sp008880. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Brown K. T. The eclectroretinogram: its components and their origins. Vision Res. 1968 Jun;8(6):633–677. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(68)90041-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cohen M. W. The contribution by glial cells to surface recordings from the optic nerve of an amphibian. J Physiol. 1970 Oct;210(3):565–580. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1970.sp009227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Daw N. W., Pearlman A. L. Rod saturation in the cat. Vision Res. 1971 Nov;11(11):1361–1364. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(71)90020-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Dowling J. E., Ripps H. Visual adaptation in the retina of the skate. J Gen Physiol. 1970 Oct;56(4):491–520. doi: 10.1085/jgp.56.4.491. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Fain G. L., Dowling J. E. Intracellular recordings from single rods and cones in the mudpuppy retina. Science. 1973 Jun 15;180(4091):1178–1181. doi: 10.1126/science.180.4091.1178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Grabowski S. R., Pinto L. H., Pak W. L. Adaptation in retinal rods of axolotl: intracellular recordings. Science. 1972 Jun 16;176(4040):1240–1243. doi: 10.1126/science.176.4040.1240. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Granit R. The components of the retinal action potential in mammals and their relation to the discharge in the optic nerve. J Physiol. 1933 Feb 8;77(3):207–239. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1933.sp002964. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kaneko A., Yamada M. S-potentials in the dark-adapted retina of the carp. J Physiol. 1972 Dec;227(1):261–273. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1972.sp010031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Keynes R. D., Ritchie J. M. The movements of labelled ions in mammalian non-myelinated nerve fibres. J Physiol. 1965 Jul;179(2):333–367. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1965.sp007666. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kuffler S. W. Neuroglial cells: physiological properties and a potassium mediated effect of neuronal activity on the glial membrane potential. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1967 Jun 6;168(1010):1–21. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1967.0047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kuffler S. W., Nicholls J. G., Orkand R. K. Physiological properties of glial cells in the central nervous system of amphibia. J Neurophysiol. 1966 Jul;29(4):768–787. doi: 10.1152/jn.1966.29.4.768. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Miller R. F., Dowling J. E. Intracellular responses of the Müller (glial) cells of mudpuppy retina: their relation to b-wave of the electroretinogram. J Neurophysiol. 1970 May;33(3):323–341. doi: 10.1152/jn.1970.33.3.323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Miller R. F. Role of K + in generation of b-wave of electroretinogram. J Neurophysiol. 1973 Jan;36(1):28–38. doi: 10.1152/jn.1973.36.1.28. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Naka K. I., Rushton W. A. S-potentials from colour units in the retina of fish (Cyprinidae). J Physiol. 1966 Aug;185(3):536–555. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1966.sp008001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Penn R. D., Hagins W. A. Signal transmission along retinal rods and the origin of the electroretinographic a-wave. Nature. 1969 Jul 12;223(5202):201–204. doi: 10.1038/223201a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Ransom B. R., Goldring S. Ionic determinants of membrane potential of cells presumed to be glia in cerebral cortex of cat. J Neurophysiol. 1973 Sep;36(5):855–868. doi: 10.1152/jn.1973.36.5.855. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Rodieck R. W. Components of the electroretinogram--a reappraisal. Vision Res. 1972 May;12(5):773–780. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(72)90003-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. STILES W. S. Increment thresholds and the mechanisms of colour vision. Doc Ophthalmol. 1949;3:138–165. doi: 10.1007/BF00162601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Steinberg R. H., Schmidt R., Brown K. T. Intracellular responses to light from cat pigment epithelium: origin of the electroretinogram c-wave. Nature. 1970 Aug 15;227(5259):728–730. doi: 10.1038/227728a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Witkovsky P., Nelson J., Ripps H. Action spectra and adaptation properties of carp photoreceptors. J Gen Physiol. 1973 Apr;61(4):401–423. doi: 10.1085/jgp.61.4.401. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Witkovsky P. The effect of chromatic adaptation on color sensitivity of the carp electroretinogram. Vision Res. 1968 Jul;8(7):823–837. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(68)90133-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of General Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES