Skip to main content
The Journal of General Physiology logoLink to The Journal of General Physiology
. 1975 Jun 1;65(6):797–816. doi: 10.1085/jgp.65.6.797

Conductance increases produced by bath application of cholinergic agonists to Electrophorus electroplaques

PMCID: PMC2214893  PMID: 1194885

Abstract

When solutions containing agonists are applied to the innervated face of an Electrophorus electroplaque, the membrane's conductance increases. The agonist-induced conductance is increased at more negative membrane potentials. The "instantaneous" current-voltage curve for agonist-induced currents is linear and shows a reversal potential near zero mV; chord conductances, calculated on the basis of this reversal potential, change epsilon-fold for every 62-mV change in potential when the conductance is small. Conductance depends non- linearly on small agonist concentrations; at all potentials, the dose- response curve has a Hill coefficient of 1.45 for decamethonium (Deca) and 1.90 for carbamylcholine (Carb). With agonist concentrations greater than 10(-4) M Carb or 10(-%) M Deca, the conductance rises to a peak 0.5-1.5 min after introduction of agonist, then declines with time; this effect resembles the "desensitization" reported for myoneural junctions. Elapid alpha-toxin, tubocurarine, and desensitization reduce the conductance without changing the effects of potential; the apparent dissociation constant for tubocurarine is 2 X 10(-7) M. By contrast, procaine effects a greater fractional inhibition of the conductance at high negative potentials.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.4 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Anderson C. R., Stevens C. F. Voltage clamp analysis of acetylcholine produced end-plate current fluctuations at frog neuromuscular junction. J Physiol. 1973 Dec;235(3):655–691. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1973.sp010410. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cartaud J., Benedetti E. L., Cohen J. B., Meunier J. C., Changeux J. P. Presence of a lattice structure in membrane fragments rich in nicotinic receptor protein from the electric organ of Torpedo marmorata. FEBS Lett. 1973 Jun 15;33(1):109–113. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(73)80171-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Changeux J. P., Podleski T. R. On the excitability and cooperativity of the electroplax membrane. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1968 Mar;59(3):944–950. doi: 10.1073/pnas.59.3.944. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Colquhoun D., Dionne V. E., Steinbach J. H., Stevens C. F. Conductance of channels opened by acetylcholine-like drugs in muscle end-plate. Nature. 1975 Jan 17;253(5488):204–206. doi: 10.1038/253204a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. HIGMAN H. B., PODLESKI T. R., BARTELS E. APPARENT DISSOCIATION CONSTANTS BETWEEN CARBAMYLCHOLINE, DELTA-TUBOCURARINE AND THE RECEPTOR. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1963 Sep 24;75:187–193. doi: 10.1016/0006-3002(63)90597-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. HODGKIN A. L., HUXLEY A. F., KATZ B. Measurement of current-voltage relations in the membrane of the giant axon of Loligo. J Physiol. 1952 Apr;116(4):424–448. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1952.sp004716. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Jenkinson D. H., Terrar D. A. Influence of chloride ions on changes in membrane potential during prolonged application of carbachol to frog skeletal muscle. Br J Pharmacol. 1973 Feb;47(2):363–376. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1973.tb08334.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Karlin A. Permeability and internal concentration of ions during depolarization of the electroplax. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1967 Sep;58(3):1162–1167. doi: 10.1073/pnas.58.3.1162. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Katz B., Miledi R. The statistical nature of the acetycholine potential and its molecular components. J Physiol. 1972 Aug;224(3):665–699. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1972.sp009918. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kordas M. An attempt at an analysis of the factors determining the time course of the end-plate current. I. The effects of prostigmine and of the ratio of Mg 2+ to Ca 2+ . J Physiol. 1972 Jul;224(2):317–332. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1972.sp009897. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kordas M. An attempt at an analysis of the factors determining the time course of the end-plate current. II. Temperature. J Physiol. 1972 Jul;224(2):333–348. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1972.sp009898. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kordas M. The effect of membrane polarization on the time course of the end-plate current in frog sartorius muscle. J Physiol. 1969 Oct;204(2):493–502. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1969.sp008926. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Magazanik L. G., Vyskocil F. Dependence of acetylcholine desensitization on the membrane potential of frog muscle fibre and on the ionic changes in the medium. J Physiol. 1970 Oct;210(3):507–518. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1970.sp009223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Magleby K. L., Stevens C. F. A quantitative description of end-plate currents. J Physiol. 1972 May;223(1):173–197. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1972.sp009840. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Meunier J. C., Changeux J. P. Comparison between the affinities for reversible cholinergic ligands of a purified and membrane bound state of the acetylcholine-receptor protein from Electrophorus electricus. FEBS Lett. 1973 May 15;32(1):143–148. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(73)80758-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Nickel E., Potter L. T. Ultrastructure of isolated membranes of Torpedo electric tissue. Brain Res. 1973 Jul 27;57(2):508–517. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(73)90158-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Rubin M. M., Changeux J. P. On the nature of allosteric transitions: implications of non-exclusive ligand binding. J Mol Biol. 1966 Nov 14;21(2):265–274. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(66)90097-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of General Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES