Skip to main content
The Journal of General Physiology logoLink to The Journal of General Physiology
. 1975 Apr 1;65(4):441–458. doi: 10.1085/jgp.65.4.441

Effect of diameter on membrane capacity and conductance of sheep cardiac Purkinje fibers

PMCID: PMC2214923  PMID: 1151322

Abstract

Membrane electrical properties were measured in sheep cardiac Purkinje fibers, having diameters ranging from 50 to 300 mum. Both membrane capacitance and conductance per unit area of apparent fiber surface varied fourfold over this range. Membrane time constant, and capacitance per unit apparent surface area calculated from the foot of the action potential were independent of fiber diameter, having average values of 18.8 +/- 0.7 ms, and 3.4 +/- 0.25 muF/cm2, respectively (mean +/- SEM). The conduction velocity and time constant of the foot of the action potential also appeared independent of diameter, having values of 3.0 +/- 0.1 m/s and 0.10 +/- 0.007 ms. These findings are consistent with earlier suggestions that in addition to membrane on the surface of the fiber, there exists a large fraction of membrane in continuity with the extracellular space but not directly on the surface of the fiber. Combining the electrical and morphological information, it was possible to predict a passive length constant for the internal membranes of about 100 mum and a time constant for chaning these membranes in a passive 100-mum fiber of 1.7 ms.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.1 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. FALK G., FATT P. LINEAR ELECTRICAL PROPERTIES OF STRIATED MUSCLE FIBRES OBSERVED WITH INTRACELLULAR ELECTRODES. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1964 Apr 14;160:69–123. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1964.0030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Fozzard H. A. Membrane capacity of the cardiac Purkinje fibre. J Physiol. 1966 Jan;182(2):255–267. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1966.sp007823. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Fozzard H. A., Schoenberg M. Strength-duration curves in cardiac Purkinje fibres: effects of liminal length and charge distribution. J Physiol. 1972 Nov;226(3):593–618. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1972.sp009999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hellam D. C., Studt J. W. Linear analysis of membrane conductance and capacitance in cardiac Purkinje fibres. J Physiol. 1974 Dec;243(3):661–694. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1974.sp010771. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hodgkin A. L., Nakajima S. Analysis of the membrane capacity in frog muscle. J Physiol. 1972 Feb;221(1):121–136. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1972.sp009743. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Mobley B. A., Page E. The surface area of sheep cardiac Purkinje fibres. J Physiol. 1972 Feb;220(3):547–563. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1972.sp009722. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Sommer J. R., Johnson E. A. Cardiac muscle. A comparative study of Purkinje fibers and ventricular fibers. J Cell Biol. 1968 Mar;36(3):497–526. doi: 10.1083/jcb.36.3.497. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. TASAKI I., HAGIWARA S. Capacity of muscle fiber membrane. Am J Physiol. 1957 Mar;188(3):423–429. doi: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1957.188.3.423. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of General Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES