Skip to main content
The Journal of General Physiology logoLink to The Journal of General Physiology
. 1976 Mar 1;67(3):343–367. doi: 10.1085/jgp.67.3.343

Electromechanical coupling in tubular muscle fibers. II. Resistance and capacitance of one transverse tubule

PMCID: PMC2214970  PMID: 1262853

Abstract

In tubular muscle fibers of the yellow scorpion the transverse tubules are arranged in a radial symmetry. This particular morphology, enables one to derive values for electrical components of one transverse tubule (TT) by treating the TT as a core conductor rather than a complex network. The electrical properties of tubular muscle fibers were completely characterized and analyzed by measuring two independent functions of frequency, i.e., the characteristic impedance and the propagation function. The impedance of a single tubular muscle fiber was determined with microelectrodes over the frequency range 1 Hz to 1.5 kHz. The results were fitted to a possible equivalent circuit model which is based on morphological evidence. The average component values for this model are: Ri = 209 omega-cm, Rm, and RT = 980 omega-cm2 (referred to unit area of surface membrane), Cm and CT = 0.9 muF/cm2, and RL = 103 omega-cm. Relating the equivalent circuit to ultrastructure shows that the average component values are consistent with the hypothesis that the TT is open to the extracellular medium, the electrical capacity of surface and TT membranes is about 1 muF/cm2, and the spread of surface depolarization into the TT is attenuated by about 25%.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (2.0 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Adrian R. H., Chandler W. K., Hodgkin A. L. The kinetics of mechanical activation in frog muscle. J Physiol. 1969 Sep;204(1):207–230. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1969.sp008909. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Freygang W. H., Jr, Rapoport S. I., Peachey L. D. Some relations between changes in the linear electrical properties of striated muscle fibers and changes in ultrastructure. J Gen Physiol. 1967 Nov;50(10):2437–2458. doi: 10.1085/jgp.50.10.2437. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Gilai A., Parnas I. Electromechanical coupling in tubular muscle fibers. I. The organization of tubular muscle fibers in the scorpion Leiurus quinquestriatus. J Cell Biol. 1972 Mar;52(3):626–638. doi: 10.1083/jcb.52.3.626. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. HUXLEY A. F., TAYLOR R. E. Local activation of striated muscle fibres. J Physiol. 1958 Dec 30;144(3):426–441. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1958.sp006111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hodgkin A. L., Nakajima S. Analysis of the membrane capacity in frog muscle. J Physiol. 1972 Feb;221(1):121–136. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1972.sp009743. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Mobley B. A., Leung J., Eisenberg R. S. Longitudinal impedance of skinned frog muscle fibers. J Gen Physiol. 1974 May;63(5):625–637. doi: 10.1085/jgp.63.5.625. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Peachey L. D. The sarcoplasmic reticulum and transverse tubules of the frog's sartorius. J Cell Biol. 1965 Jun;25(3 Suppl):209–231. doi: 10.1083/jcb.25.3.209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Sandow A. Excitation-contraction coupling in skeletal muscle. Pharmacol Rev. 1965 Sep;17(3):265–320. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Valdiosera R., Clausen C., Eisenberg R. S. Circuit models of the passive electrical properties of frog skeletal muscle fibers. J Gen Physiol. 1974 Apr;63(4):432–459. doi: 10.1085/jgp.63.4.432. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Valdiosera R., Clausen C., Eisenberg R. S. Impedance of frog skeletal muscle fibers in various solutions. J Gen Physiol. 1974 Apr;63(4):460–491. doi: 10.1085/jgp.63.4.460. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Valdiosera R., Clausen C., Eisenberg R. S. Measurement of the impedance of frog skeletal muscle fibers. Biophys J. 1974 Apr;14(4):295–315. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(74)85917-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of General Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES