Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of General Physiology logoLink to The Journal of General Physiology
. 1980 Jan 1;75(1):21–37. doi: 10.1085/jgp.75.1.21

Electrophysiological properties of resting secretory membranes of lamellibranch mantles. Interaction between calcium and potassium

PMCID: PMC2215182  PMID: 7359117

Abstract

This study concerns the effects of ions on the shell-secreting membrane of clam mantles. The average resting potentials were --47 mV for freshwater mantles and --60 mV for marine mantles. Elevation of potassium in the absence of chloride gave a maximal slope of depolarization equivalent to 59 mV for a 10-fold change in the marine form but much less in the freshwater form. In normal potassium, a 10- fold reduction in calcium produced a hyperpolarization of 6 mV for the freshwater mantle. Neither reduction nor elevation of calcium affected the potential of marine mantles in the presence of normal potassium, but a hyperpolarization of 8 mV occurred when calcium was deleted in a low-potassium medium. Elevated calcium reduced the depolarization induced by raised potassium in both species and resulted in an increased effective membrane resistance in marine mantles. Lowered calcium enhanced the hyperpolarization caused by reduction in potassium in freshwater mantles but not in the marine species. Replacement of chloride by large anions produced transient depolarization in both freshwater and marine mantles and resulted in a maintained increased effective membrane resistance in marine mantles. The effects of sodium and magnesium on the membrane potential were not significant in normal potassium. We conclude that the secretory membrane of freshwater and marine clam mantles is permeable mainly to potassium and chloride, and that responses of the membrane potential to calcium are mediated through its effect on the permeability to potassium.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (983.9 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. ADRIAN R. H. The effect of internal and external potassium concentration on the membrane potential of frog muscle. J Physiol. 1956 Sep 27;133(3):631–658. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1956.sp005615. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bennett M. V., Trinkaus J. P. Electrical coupling between embryonic cells by way of extracellular space and specialized junctions. J Cell Biol. 1970 Mar;44(3):592–610. doi: 10.1083/jcb.44.3.592. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Berridge M. J., Lindley B. D., Prince W. T. Membrane permeability changes during stimulation of isolated salivary glands of Calliphora by 5-hydroxytryptamine. J Physiol. 1975 Jan;244(3):549–567. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1975.sp010812. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Grundfest H. Comparative electrobiology of excitable membranes. Adv Comp Physiol Biochem. 1966;2:1–116. doi: 10.1016/b978-0-12-395511-1.50006-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. HODGKIN A. L. Ionic movements and electrical activity in giant nerve fibres. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1958 Jan 1;148(930):1–37. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1958.0001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. HOFFMAN B. F., SUCKLING E. E. Effect of several cations on transmembrane potentials of cardiac muscle. Am J Physiol. 1956 Aug;186(2):317–324. doi: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1956.186.2.317. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. HUXLEY A. F. Ion movements during nerve activity. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1959 Aug 28;81:221–246. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1959.tb49311.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. ISTIN M., MAETZ J. PERM'EABILIT'E AU CALCIUM DU MANTEAU DE LAMELLIBRANCHES D'EAU DOUCE ETUDI'EE 'A L'AIDE DES ISOTOPES 45CA ET 47CA. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1964 Jul 29;88:225–227. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Istin M., Kirschner L. B. On the origin of the bioelectrical potential gverated by the freshwater clam mantle. J Gen Physiol. 1968 Apr;51(4):478–496. doi: 10.1085/jgp.51.4.478. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. KIRSCHNER L. B., SORENSON A. L., KRIEBEL M. Calcium and electric potential across the clam mantle. Science. 1960 Mar 11;131(3402):735–735. doi: 10.1126/science.131.3402.735-a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Koketsu K. Calcium and the excitable cell membrane. Neurosci Res (N Y) 1969;2(0):1–39. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Mackie G. O. Propagated spikes and secretion in a coelenterate glandular epithelium. J Gen Physiol. 1976 Sep;68(3):313–325. doi: 10.1085/jgp.68.3.313. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. NOBLE D. The voltage dependence of the cardiac membrane conductance. Biophys J. 1962 Sep;2:381–393. doi: 10.1016/s0006-3495(62)86862-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Neff J. M. Ultrastructure of the outer epithelium of the mantle in the clam Mercenaria mercenaria in relation to calcification of the shell. Tissue Cell. 1972;4(4):591–600. doi: 10.1016/s0040-8166(72)80032-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Petersen O. H. Electrophysiology of mammalian gland cells. Physiol Rev. 1976 Jul;56(3):535–577. doi: 10.1152/physrev.1976.56.3.535. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Sato K. The physiology, pharmacology, and biochemistry of the eccrine sweat gland. Rev Physiol Biochem Pharmacol. 1977;79:51–131. doi: 10.1007/BFb0037089. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of General Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES