Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of General Physiology logoLink to The Journal of General Physiology
. 1980 May 1;75(5):493–510. doi: 10.1085/jgp.75.5.493

The permeability of endplate channels to monovalent and divalent metal cations

PMCID: PMC2215258  PMID: 6247423

Abstract

The relative permeability of endplate channels to monovalent and divalent metal ions was determined from reversal potentials. Thallium is the most permeant ion with a permeability ratio relative to Na+ of 2.5. The selectivity among alkali metals is weak with a sequence, Cs+ greater than Rb+ greater than K+ greater than Na+ greater than Li+, and permeability ratios of 1.4, 1.3, 1.1, 1.0, and 0.9. The selectivity among divalent ions is also weak, with a sequence for alkaline earths of Mg++ greater than Ca++ greater than Ba++ greater than Sr++. The transition metal ions Mn++, Co++, Ni++, Zn++, and Cd++ are also permeant. Permeability ratios for divalent ions decreased as the concentration of divalent ion was increased in a manner consistent with the negative surface potential theory of Lewis (1979 J. Physiol. (Lond.). 286: 417--445). With 20 mM XCl2 and 85.5 mM glucosamine.HCl in the external solution, the apparent permeability ratios for the alkaline earth cations (X++) are in the range 0.18--0.25. Alkali metal ions see the endplate channel as a water-filled, neutral pore without high-field-strength sites inside. Their permeability sequence is the same as their aqueous mobility sequence. Divalent ions, however, have a permeability sequence almost opposite from their mobility sequence and must experience some interaction with groups in the channel. In addition, the concentrations of monovalent and divalent ions are increased near the channel mouth by a weak negative surface potential.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.1 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Adams P. R., Sakmann B. Decamethonium both opens and blocks endplate channels. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1978 Jun;75(6):2994–2998. doi: 10.1073/pnas.75.6.2994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Adams P. R. Voltage jump analysis of procaine action at frog end-plate. J Physiol. 1977 Jun;268(2):291–318. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1977.sp011858. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Adler M., Oliveira A. C., Albuquerque E. X., Mansour N. A., Eldefrawi A. T. Reaction of tetraethylammonium with the open and closed conformations of the acetylcholine receptor ionic channel complex. J Gen Physiol. 1979 Jul;74(1):129–152. doi: 10.1085/jgp.74.1.129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Barry P. H., Gage P. W., Van Helden D. F. Cation permeation of the amphibian motor end-plate. J Membr Biol. 1979 Apr 9;45(3-4):245–276. doi: 10.1007/BF01869288. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bregestovski P. D., Miledi R., Parker I. Calcium conductance of acetylcholine-induced endplate channels. Nature. 1979 Jun 14;279(5714):638–639. doi: 10.1038/279638a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Campbell D. T., Hille B. Kinetic and pharmacological properties of the sodium channel of frog skeletal muscle. J Gen Physiol. 1976 Mar;67(3):309–323. doi: 10.1085/jgp.67.3.309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cohen I., Van der Kloot W. Effects of [Ca2+] and [Mg2+] on the decay of miniature endplate currents. Nature. 1978 Jan 5;271(5640):77–79. doi: 10.1038/271077a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Dionne V. E., Ruff R. L. Endplate current fluctuations reveal only one channel type at frog neuromuscular junction. Nature. 1977 Mar 17;266(5599):263–265. doi: 10.1038/266263a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Dionne V. E., Stevens C. F. Voltage dependence of agonist effectiveness at the frog neuromuscular junction: resolution of a paradox. J Physiol. 1975 Oct;251(2):245–270. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1975.sp011090. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Dwyer T. M., Adams D. J., Hille B. The permeability of the endplate channel to organic cations in frog muscle. J Gen Physiol. 1980 May;75(5):469–492. doi: 10.1085/jgp.75.5.469. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. EISENMAN G. Cation selective glass electrodes and their mode of operation. Biophys J. 1962 Mar;2(2 Pt 2):259–323. doi: 10.1016/s0006-3495(62)86959-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Evans R. H. The entry of labelled calcium into the innervated region of the mouse diaphragm muscle. J Physiol. 1974 Aug;240(3):517–533. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1974.sp010621. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. FATT P., KATZ B. An analysis of the end-plate potential recorded with an intracellular electrode. J Physiol. 1951 Nov 28;115(3):320–370. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1951.sp004675. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. FATT P. The electromotive action of acetylcholine at the motor end-plate. J Physiol. 1950 Oct 16;111(3-4):408–422. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1950.sp004492. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Gage P. W., Van Helden D. Effects of permeant monovalent cations on end-plate channels. J Physiol. 1979 Mar;288:509–528. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. HODGKIN A. L., KATZ B. The effect of sodium ions on the electrical activity of giant axon of the squid. J Physiol. 1949 Mar 1;108(1):37–77. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1949.sp004310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Hille B., Schwarz W. Potassium channels as multi-ion single-file pores. J Gen Physiol. 1978 Oct;72(4):409–442. doi: 10.1085/jgp.72.4.409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Hille B., Woodhull A. M., Shapiro B. I. Negative surface charge near sodium channels of nerve: divalent ions, monovalent ions, and pH. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1975 Jun 10;270(908):301–318. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1975.0011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Huang L. Y., Catterall W. A., Ehrenstein G. Selectivity of cations and nonelectrolytes for acetylcholine-activated channels in cultured muscle cells. J Gen Physiol. 1978 Apr;71(4):397–410. doi: 10.1085/jgp.71.4.397. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. JENKINSON D. H., NICHOLLS J. G. Contractures and permeability changes produced by acetylcholine in depolarized denervated muscle. J Physiol. 1961 Nov;159:111–127. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1961.sp006796. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Katz B., Miledi R. Spontaneous and evoked activity of motor nerve endings in calcium Ringer. J Physiol. 1969 Aug;203(3):689–706. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1969.sp008887. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Lassignal N. L., Martin A. R. Effect of acetylcholine on postjunctional membrane permeability in eel electroplaque. J Gen Physiol. 1977 Jul;70(1):23–36. doi: 10.1085/jgp.70.1.23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Neher E., Stevens C. F. Conductance fluctuations and ionic pores in membranes. Annu Rev Biophys Bioeng. 1977;6:345–381. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bb.06.060177.002021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Sandblom J., Eisenman G., Neher E. Ionic selectivity, saturation and block in gramicidin A channels: I. Theory for the electrical properties of ion selective channels having two pairs of binding sites and multiple conductance states. J Membr Biol. 1977 Mar 23;31(4):383–347. doi: 10.1007/BF01869414. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Van der Kloot W. G., Cohen I. Membrane surface potential changes may alter drug interactions: an example, acetylcholine and curare. Science. 1979 Mar 30;203(4387):1351–1352. doi: 10.1126/science.424757. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of General Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES