Skip to main content
PMC home page
The Journal of General Physiology logoLink to The Journal of General Physiology
. 1980 May 1;75(5):511–529. doi: 10.1085/jgp.75.5.511

Voltage dependence of desensitization. Influence of calcium and activation kinetics

PMCID: PMC2215261  PMID: 6966673

Abstract

The voltage dependence of carbachol-induced desensitization has been analyzed in potassium-depolarized frog sartorius muscle preparations with voltage clamp techniques over a wide voltage range (-120 to +40 mV). Desensitization developed exponentially at all voltages with tau, the time constant of desensitization onset, varying as a logarithmic function of membrane voltage. The voltage dependence of tau remained in calcium-deficient solutions and was not altered by elevating either the level of extracellular or intracellular calcium. We have analyzed our results according to a simple sequential kinetic scheme in which the rate-limiting step in the development of desensitization is a transition of the receptor channel complex from the activated conducting state to a desensitized, nonconducting state. We conclude (a) that the observed voltage sensitivity of desensitization primarily resides in the voltage dependence of this transition, and (b) the kinetics of activation appear to have a greater influence on the observed rate of desensitization than on its voltage dependence. The magnitude of the voltage dependence suggests that a greater change in free energy is required for the transition to the desensitized state than for the transition between the open and closed states of the receptor channel complex.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.1 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Adams P. R. A study of desensitization using voltage clamp. Pflugers Arch. 1975 Oct 28;360(2):135–144. doi: 10.1007/BF00580536. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Adams P. R., Sakmann B. A comparison of current-voltage relations for full and partial agonists. J Physiol. 1978 Oct;283:621–644. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1978.sp012523. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Adams P. R. Voltage dependence of agonist responses at voltage-clamped frog endplates. Pflugers Arch. 1976 Jan 30;361(2):145–151. doi: 10.1007/BF00583458. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. DeBassio W. A., Parsons R. L., Schnitzler R. M. Effect of ionophore X-537A on desensitization rate and tension development in potassium-depolarized muscle fibres. Br J Pharmacol. 1976 Aug;57(4):565–571. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1976.tb10386.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Dionne V. E., Steinbach J. H., Stevens C. F. An analysis of the dose-response relationship at voltage-clamped frog neuromuscular junctions. J Physiol. 1978 Aug;281:421–444. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1978.sp012431. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Dionne V. E., Stevens C. F. Voltage dependence of agonist effectiveness at the frog neuromuscular junction: resolution of a paradox. J Physiol. 1975 Oct;251(2):245–270. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1975.sp011090. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. KATZ B., THESLEFF S. A study of the desensitization produced by acetylcholine at the motor end-plate. J Physiol. 1957 Aug 29;138(1):63–80. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1957.sp005838. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kuno M., Turkanis S. A., Weakly J. N. Correlation between nerve terminal size and transmitter release at the neuromuscular junction of the frog. J Physiol. 1971 Mar;213(3):545–556. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1971.sp009399. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Lambert D. H., Spannbauer P. M., Parsons R. L. Desensitisation does not selectively alter sodium channels. Nature. 1977 Aug 11;268(5620):553–555. doi: 10.1038/268553a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Linder T. M., Quastel D. M. A voltage-clamp study of the permeability change induced by quanta of transmitter at the mouse end-plate. J Physiol. 1978 Aug;281:535–558. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1978.sp012438. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Magleby K. L., Stevens C. F. A quantitative description of end-plate currents. J Physiol. 1972 May;223(1):173–197. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1972.sp009840. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Magleby K. L., Stevens C. F. The effect of voltage on the time course of end-plate currents. J Physiol. 1972 May;223(1):151–171. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1972.sp009839. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Manthey A. A. The antagonistic effects of calcium and potassium on the time course of action of carbamylcholine at the neuromuscular junction. J Membr Biol. 1972;9(4):319–340. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Nastuk W. L., Parsons R. L. Factors in the inactivation of postjunctional membrane receptors of frog skeletal muscle. J Gen Physiol. 1970 Aug;56(2):218–249. doi: 10.1085/jgp.56.2.218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Neher E., Sakmann B. Voltage-dependence of drug-induced conductance in frog neuromuscular junction. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1975 Jun;72(6):2140–2144. doi: 10.1073/pnas.72.6.2140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Parsons R. L., Schnitzler R. M., Cochrane D. E. Inhibition of end-plate desensitization by sodium. Am J Physiol. 1974 Jul;227(1):96–100. doi: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1974.227.1.96. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Rang H. P. Acetylcholine receptors. Q Rev Biophys. 1974 Jul;7(3):283–399. doi: 10.1017/s0033583500001463. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Rang H. P., Ritter J. M. On the mechanism of desensitization at cholinergic receptors. Mol Pharmacol. 1970 Jul;6(4):357–382. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Scarpa A., Baldassare J., Inesi G. The effect of calcium ionophores on fragmented sarcoplasmic reticulum. J Gen Physiol. 1972 Dec;60(6):735–749. doi: 10.1085/jgp.60.6.735. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Scubon-Mulieri B., Parsons R. L. Desensitization and recovery at the frog neuromuscular junction. J Gen Physiol. 1977 Apr;69(4):431–447. doi: 10.1085/jgp.69.4.431. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Scubon-Mulieri B., Parsons R. L. Desensitization onset and recovery at the potassium-depolarized frog neuromuscular junction are voltage sensitive. J Gen Physiol. 1978 Mar;71(3):285–299. doi: 10.1085/jgp.71.3.285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Sheridan R. E., Lester H. A. Rates and equilibria at the acetylcholine receptor of Electrophorus electroplaques: a study of neurally evoked postsynaptic currents and of voltage-jump relaxations. J Gen Physiol. 1977 Aug;70(2):187–219. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Stevens C. F. Interactions between intrinsic membrane protein and electric field. An approach to studying nerve excitability. Biophys J. 1978 May;22(2):295–306. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(78)85490-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. TAKEUCHI A., TAKEUCHI N. Active phase of frog's end-plate potential. J Neurophysiol. 1959 Jul;22(4):395–411. doi: 10.1152/jn.1959.22.4.395. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Van Helden D., Hamill O. P., Gage P. W. Permeant cations alter endplate channel characteristics. Nature. 1977 Oct 20;269(5630):711–713. doi: 10.1038/269711a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of General Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES