Skip to main content
PMC home page
The Journal of General Physiology logoLink to The Journal of General Physiology
. 1977 Jun 1;69(6):849–877. doi: 10.1085/jgp.69.6.849

Repetitive firing: quantitative analysis of encoder behavior of slowly adapting stretch receptor of crayfish and eccentric cell of Limulus

PMCID: PMC2215336  PMID: 894245

Abstract

Techniques developed for determining summed encoder feedback in conjunction with the leaky integrator and variable-gamma models for repetitive firing are applied to spike train data obtained from the slowly adapting crustacean stretch receptor and the eccentric cell of Limulus. Input stimuli were intracellularly applied currents. Analysis of data from cells stringently selected by reproducibility criteria gave a consistent picture for the dynamics of repetitive firing. The variable-gamma model with appropriate summed feedback was most accurate for describing encoding behavior of both cell types. The leaky integrator model, while useful for determining summed feedback parameters, was inadequate to account for underlying mechanisms of encoder activity. For the stretch receptor, two summed feedback processes were detected: one had a short time constant; the other, a long one. Appropriate tests indicated that the short time constant effect was from an electrogenic sodium pump, and the same is presumed for the long time constant summed feedback. Both feedbacks show seasonal and/or species variations. Short hyperpolarizing pulses inhibited the feedback from the long time constant process. The eccentric cell also showed two summed feedback processes: one is due to self inhibition, the other is postulated to be a short time constant electrogenic sodium pump similar to that described in the stretch receptor.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.8 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Adolph A. R. Putative synaptic mechanisms of inhibition in Limulus lateral eye. J Gen Physiol. 1976 Apr;67(4):417–431. doi: 10.1085/jgp.67.4.417. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. EDWARDS C., TERZUOLO C. A., WASHIZU H. THE EFFECT OF CHANGES OF THE IONIC ENVIRONMENT UPON AN ISOLATED CRUSTACEAN SENSORY NEURON. J Neurophysiol. 1963 Nov;26:948–957. doi: 10.1152/jn.1963.26.6.948. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. EYZAGUIRRE C., KUFFLER S. W. Processes of excitation in the dendrites and in the soma of single isolated sensory nerve cells of the lobster and crayfish. J Gen Physiol. 1955 Sep 20;39(1):87–119. doi: 10.1085/jgp.39.1.87. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. FLOREY E., FLOREY E. Microanatomy of the abdominal stretch receptors of the crayfish (Astacus fluviatilis L.). J Gen Physiol. 1955 Sep 20;39(1):69–85. doi: 10.1085/jgp.39.1.69. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. FUORTES M. G., MANTEGAZZINI F. Interpretation of the repetitive firing of nerve cells. J Gen Physiol. 1962 Jul;45:1163–1179. doi: 10.1085/jgp.45.6.1163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Fohlmeister J. F. A model for phasic and tonic repetitively firing neuronal encoders. Kybernetik. 1973 Sep;13(2):104–112. doi: 10.1007/BF00288789. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Fohlmeister J. F., Poppele R. E., Purple R. L. Repetitive firing: a quantitative study of feedback in model encoders. J Gen Physiol. 1977 Jun;69(6):815–848. doi: 10.1085/jgp.69.6.815. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Fohlmeister J. F., Poppele R. E., Purple R. L. Repetitive firing: dynamic behavior of sensory neurons reconciled with a quantitative model. J Neurophysiol. 1974 Nov;37(6):1213–1227. doi: 10.1152/jn.1974.37.6.1213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Jansen J. K., Njå A., Ormstad K., Walloe L. Inhibitory control of the abdominal stretch receptors of the crayfish. 3. The accessory reflex as a recurrent inhibitory feed-back. Acta Physiol Scand. 1971 Apr;81(4):472–483. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1971.tb04925.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Knight B. W. The relationship between the firing rate of a single neuron and the level of activity in a population of neurons. Experimental evidence for resonant enhancement in the population response. J Gen Physiol. 1972 Jun;59(6):767–778. doi: 10.1085/jgp.59.6.767. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Nakajima S., Onodera K. Membrane properties of the stretch receptor neurones of crayfish with particular reference to mechanisms of sensory adaptation. J Physiol. 1969 Jan;200(1):161–185. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1969.sp008687. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Nakajima S., Takahashi K. Post-tetanic hyperpolarization and electrogenic Na pump in stretch receptor neurone of crayfish. J Physiol. 1966 Nov;187(1):105–127. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1966.sp008078. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Obara S., Grundfest H. Effects of lithium on different membrane components of crayfish stretch receptor neurons. J Gen Physiol. 1968 May;51(5):635–654. doi: 10.1085/jgp.51.5.635. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Poppele R. E., Chen W. J. Repetitive firing behavior of mammalian muscle spindle. J Neurophysiol. 1972 May;35(3):357–364. doi: 10.1152/jn.1972.35.3.357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Purple R. L., Dodge F. A. Interaction of excitation and inhibition in the eccentric cell in the eye of Limulus. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1965;30:529–537. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1965.030.01.051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Ringham G. L. Origin of nerve impulse in slowly adapting stretch receptor of crayfish. J Neurophysiol. 1971 Sep;34(5):773–784. doi: 10.1152/jn.1971.34.5.773. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Shapley R. Fluctuations of the impulse rate in Limulus eccentric cells. J Gen Physiol. 1971 May;57(5):539–556. doi: 10.1085/jgp.57.5.539. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Sokolove P. G., Cooke I. M. Inhibition of impulse activity in a sensory neuron by an electrogenic pump. J Gen Physiol. 1971 Feb;57(2):125–163. doi: 10.1085/jgp.57.2.125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. TERZUOLO C. A., WASHIZU Y. Relation between stimulus strength, generator potential and impulse frequency in stretch receptor of Crustacea. J Neurophysiol. 1962 Jan;25:56–66. doi: 10.1152/jn.1962.25.1.56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Washizu Y., Terzuolo C. A. Impulse activity in the crayfish stretch receptor neuron. Arch Ital Biol. 1966 Jun;104(2):181–194. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of General Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES