Abstract
Properties of the receptor sites for L-amino acids in taste cells of the bullfrog (Rana catesbeiana) were examined by measuring the neural activities of the glossopharyngeal nerve under various conditions. (a) The frogs responded to 12 amino acids, but the responses to the amino acids varied with individual frogs under natural conditions. The frog tongues, however, exhibited similar responses after an alkaline treatment that removes Ca2+ from the tissue. The variation in the responses under natural conditions was apparently due to the variation in the amount of Ca2+ bound to the receptor membrane. (b) The responses to hydrophilic L-amino acids (glycine, L-alanine, L-serine, L- threonine, L-cysteine, and L-proline) were of a tonic type, but those to hydrophobic L-amino acids (L-valine, L-leucine, L-isoleucine, L- methionine, L-phenylalanine, and L-tyrptophan) were usually composed of both phasic and tonic components. (c) The properties of the tonic component were quite different from those of the phasic component: the tonic component was largely enhanced by the alkaline treatment and suppressed by the acidic treatment that increases binding of Ca2+ to the tissue. Also, the tonic component was suppressed by the presence of low concentrations of salts, or the action of pronase E, whereas the phasic component was unchanged under these conditions. These properties of the phasic component were quite similar to those of the response to hydrophobic substances such as quinine. These results suggest that the hydrophilic L-amino acids stimulate receptor protein(s) and that the hydrophobic L-amino acids stimulate both the receptor protein and a receptor site similar to that for quinine. (d) On the basis of the suppression of the responses to amino acids by salts, the mechanism of generation of the receptor potential is discussed.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (649.9 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Akaike N., Noma A., Sato M. Electrical responses to frog taste cells to chemical stimuli. J Physiol. 1976 Jan;254(1):87–107. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1976.sp011223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chandler W. K., Hodgkin A. L., Meves H. The effect of changing the internal solution on sodium inactivation and related phenomena in giant axons. J Physiol. 1965 Oct;180(4):821–836. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1965.sp007733. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- HALPERN B. P., BERNARD R. A., KARE M. R. Amino acids as gustatory stimuli in the rat. J Gen Physiol. 1962 Mar;45:681–701. doi: 10.1085/jgp.45.4.681. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hato M., Ueda T., Kurihara K., Kobatake Y. Change in zeta potential and membrane potential of slime mold Physarum polycephalum in response to chemical stimuli. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1976 Feb 19;426(1):73–80. doi: 10.1016/0005-2736(76)90430-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kamo N., Kashiwagura T., Kobatake Y., Kurihara K. Role of membrane-bound calcium in taste reception of the frog. J Physiol. 1978 Sep;282:115–129. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1978.sp012452. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kamo N., Miyake M., Kurihara K., Kobatake Y. Physicochemical studies of taste reception. II. Possible mechanism of generation of taste receptor potential induced by salt stimuli. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1974 Oct 10;367(1):11–23. doi: 10.1016/0005-2736(74)90130-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kashiwagura T., Kamo N., Kurihara K., Kobatake Y. Interpretation by theoretical model of dynamic and steady components in frog gustatory response. Am J Physiol. 1980 May;238(5):G445–G452. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.1980.238.5.G445. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kurihara K., Kamo N., Kobatake Y. Transduction mechanism in chemoreception. Adv Biophys. 1978;10:27–95. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Miyake M., Kamo N., Kurihara K., Kobatake Y. Pysicochemical studies of taste reception. V. Suppressive effect of salts on sugar response of the frog. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1976 Jul 15;436(4):856–862. doi: 10.1016/0005-2736(76)90412-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ozeki M., Sato M. Responses of gustatory cells in the tongue of rat to stimuli representing four taste qualities. Comp Biochem Physiol A Comp Physiol. 1972 Feb 1;41(2):391–407. doi: 10.1016/0300-9629(72)90070-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]