Skip to main content
The Journal of General Physiology logoLink to The Journal of General Physiology
. 1981 Jun 1;77(6):647–666. doi: 10.1085/jgp.77.6.647

pH dependence of the acetylcholine receptor channel: a species variation

PMCID: PMC2215442  PMID: 6267164

Abstract

The effects of pH changes on the miniature endplate current (mepc) and on endplate current fluctuations (acetylcholine [ACh] noise) were examined at the neuromuscular junction in vitro in two species of frogs. In Rana pipiens the relationship between the decay time constant of the mepc (tau') and pH had a symmetrical bell shape; the value of tau' being largest at pH 7 and decreasing at more acid or more alkaline pH. In acid pH the mepc amplitude (A) decreased relative to its value at pH 7, and in alkaline pH A increased. In Rana ridibunda a narrower and asymmetric bell-shaped dependence of tau' on pH, having a maximum of pH 5.5, was found. The mepc amplitude was again reduced in acid pH but had a peak at pH 5.5. Also, its value at pH 9 was larger than at pH 7. These results were obtained with a number of different buffers and were not found to be sensitive to the nature of the buffer chosen. By performing ACh-noise analysis we found that in Rana pipiens at acid pH (5.5-5.0), the single channel conductance (gamma) and the single channel open time (tau) were significantly reduced relative to their value at pH 7. However, in Rana ridibunda at acid pH (5.4) gamma was unchanged and tau was markedly increased relative to their values at pH 7. The results can be explained quantitatively by electrostatic interaction between two fixed and titratable ionic groups and a mobile charge in the receptor molecule. The model fits the data for groups having pKs approximately 4.8 and approximately 9.8 for Rana pipiens and approximately 4.6 and approximately 6.3 for Rana ridibunda. The groups can be tentatively identified as amino acid residues; glutamic or aspartic and lysine or tyrosine for Rana pipiens; glutamic or aspartic and histidine for Rana ridibunda. The difference in the fitted values of the other model parameters for these two species can be attributed to differences in the spatial configuration of the charged groups.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.1 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Anderson C. R., Stevens C. F. Voltage clamp analysis of acetylcholine produced end-plate current fluctuations at frog neuromuscular junction. J Physiol. 1973 Dec;235(3):655–691. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1973.sp010410. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bregestovski P. D., Miledi R., Parker I. Calcium conductance of acetylcholine-induced endplate channels. Nature. 1979 Jun 14;279(5714):638–639. doi: 10.1038/279638a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Campbell D. T., Hille B. Kinetic and pharmacological properties of the sodium channel of frog skeletal muscle. J Gen Physiol. 1976 Mar;67(3):309–323. doi: 10.1085/jgp.67.3.309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cohen I., Van Der Kloot W. The effects of pH changes on the frequency of miniature end-plate potentials at the frog neuromuscular junction. J Physiol. 1976 Nov;262(2):401–414. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1976.sp011601. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Dionne V. E., Stevens C. F. Voltage dependence of agonist effectiveness at the frog neuromuscular junction: resolution of a paradox. J Physiol. 1975 Oct;251(2):245–270. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1975.sp011090. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Gilbert D. L., Ehrenstein G. Effect of divalent cations on potassium conductance of squid axons: determination of surface charge. Biophys J. 1969 Mar;9(3):447–463. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(69)86396-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hille B., Woodhull A. M., Shapiro B. I. Negative surface charge near sodium channels of nerve: divalent ions, monovalent ions, and pH. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1975 Jun 10;270(908):301–318. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1975.0011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Landau E. M. Function and structure of the ACh receptor at the muscle end-plate. Prog Neurobiol. 1978;10(4):253–288. doi: 10.1016/0301-0082(78)90005-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Lewis C. A. Ion-concentration dependence of the reversal potential and the single channel conductance of ion channels at the frog neuromuscular junction. J Physiol. 1979 Jan;286:417–445. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1979.sp012629. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Magleby K. L., Weinstock M. M. Nickel and calcium ions modify the characteristics of the acetylcholine receptor-channel complex at the frog neuromuscular junction. J Physiol. 1980 Feb;299:203–218. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1980.sp013120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Mallart A., Molgó J. The effects of pH and curare on the time course of end-plate currents at the neuromuscular junction of the frog. J Physiol. 1978 Mar;276:343–352. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1978.sp012238. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. McLaughlin S. G., Szabo G., Eisenman G. Divalent ions and the surface potential of charged phospholipid membranes. J Gen Physiol. 1971 Dec;58(6):667–687. doi: 10.1085/jgp.58.6.667. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Scuka M. The effects of pH on the conductance change evoked by iontophoresis in the frog neuromuscular junction. Pflugers Arch. 1977 Jul 19;369(3):239–244. doi: 10.1007/BF00582190. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Thomas R. C. Intracellular pH of snail neurones measured with a new pH-sensitive glass mirco-electrode. J Physiol. 1974 Apr;238(1):159–180. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1974.sp010516. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Woodhull A. M. Ionic blockage of sodium channels in nerve. J Gen Physiol. 1973 Jun;61(6):687–708. doi: 10.1085/jgp.61.6.687. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of General Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES