Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of General Physiology logoLink to The Journal of General Physiology
. 1983 Apr 1;81(4):547–569. doi: 10.1085/jgp.81.4.547

Comparison of excitatory currents activated by different transmitters on crustacean muscle. I. Acetylcholine-activated channels

PMCID: PMC2215586  PMID: 6133907

Abstract

The properties of acetylcholine-activated excitatory currents on the gm1 muscle of three marine decapod crustaceans, the spiny lobsters Panulirus argus and interruptus, and the crab Cancer borealis, were examined using either noise analysis, analysis of synaptic current decays, or analysis of the voltage dependence of ionophoretically activated cholinergic conductance increases. The apparent mean channel open time (tau n) obtained from noise analysis at -80 mV and 12 degrees C was approximately 13 ms; tau n was prolonged e-fold for about every 100-mV hyperpolarization in membrane potential; tau n was prolonged e- fold for every 10 degrees C decrease in temperature. Gamma, the single- channel conductance, at 12 degrees C was approximately 18 pS and was not affected by voltage; gamma was increased approximately 2.5-fold for every 10 degrees C increase in temperature. Synaptic currents decayed with a single exponential time course, and at -80 mV and 12 degrees C, the time constant of decay of synaptic currents, tau ejc, was approximately 14-15 ms and was prolonged e-fold about every 140-mV hyperpolarization; tau ejc was prolonged about e-fold for every 10 degrees C decrease in temperature. The voltage dependence of the amplitude of steady-state cholinergic currents suggests that the total conductance increase produced by cholinergic agonists is increased with hyperpolarization. Compared with glutamate channels found on similar decapod muscles (see the following article), the acetylcholine channels stay open longer, conduct ions more slowly, and are more sensitive to changes in the membrane potential.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.3 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Adams P. R. Acetylcholine receptor kinetics. J Membr Biol. 1981 Feb 28;58(3):161–174. doi: 10.1007/BF01870902. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Adams P. R. Relaxation experiments using bath-applied suberyldicholine. J Physiol. 1977 Jun;268(2):271–289. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1977.sp011857. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Adams P. R., Sakmann B. A comparison of current-voltage relations for full and partial agonists. J Physiol. 1978 Oct;283:621–644. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1978.sp012523. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Anderson C. R., Cull-Candy S. G., Miledi R. Glutamate current noise: post-synaptic channel kinetics investigated under voltage clamp. J Physiol. 1978 Sep;282:219–242. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1978.sp012459. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Anderson C. R., Stevens C. F. Voltage clamp analysis of acetylcholine produced end-plate current fluctuations at frog neuromuscular junction. J Physiol. 1973 Dec;235(3):655–691. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1973.sp010410. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ascher P., Large W. A., Rang H. P. Studies on the mechanism of action of acetylcholine antagonists on rat parasympathetic ganglion cells. J Physiol. 1979 Oct;295:139–170. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1979.sp012958. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Ascher P., Marty A., Neild T. O. Life time and elementary conductance of the channels mediating the excitatory effects of acetylcholine in Aplysia neurones. J Physiol. 1978 May;278:177–206. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1978.sp012299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Brenner H. R., Sakmann B. Gating properties of acetycholine receptor in newly formed neuromuscular synapses. Nature. 1978 Jan 26;271(5643):366–368. doi: 10.1038/271366a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Colquhoun D., Hawkes A. G. On the stochastic properties of single ion channels. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1981 Mar 6;211(1183):205–235. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1981.0003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Colquhoun D., Hawkes A. G. Relaxation and fluctuations of membrane currents that flow through drug-operated channels. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1977 Nov 14;199(1135):231–262. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1977.0137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Colquhoun D., Sakmann B. Fluctuations in the microsecond time range of the current through single acetylcholine receptor ion channels. Nature. 1981 Dec 3;294(5840):464–466. doi: 10.1038/294464a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Crawford A. C., McBurney R. N. On the elementary conductance event produced by L-glutamate and quanta of the natural transmitter at the neuromuscular junctions of Maia squinado. J Physiol. 1976 Jun;258(1):205–225. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1976.sp011415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Cull-Candy S. G., Miledi R., Parker I. Single glutamate-activated channels recorded from locust muscle fibres with perfused patch-clamp electrodes. J Physiol. 1981 Dec;321:195–210. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1981.sp013979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Cull-Candy S. G., Parker I. Rapid kinetics of single glutamate-receptor channels. Nature. 1982 Feb 4;295(5848):410–412. doi: 10.1038/295410a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. DEL CASTILLO J., KATZ B. Interaction at end-plate receptors between different choline derivatives. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1957 May 7;146(924):369–381. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1957.0018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. DUDEL J., KUFFLER S. W. The quantal nature of transmission and spontaneous miniature potentials at the crayfish neuromuscular junction. J Physiol. 1961 Mar;155:514–529. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1961.sp006644. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Dionne V. E., Parsons R. L. Characteristics of the acetylcholine-operated channel at twitch and slow fibre neuromuscular junctions of the garter snake. J Physiol. 1981 Jan;310:145–158. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1981.sp013541. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Dudel J. Nonlinear voltage dependence of excitatory synaptic current in crayfish muscle. Pflugers Arch. 1974;352(3):227–241. doi: 10.1007/BF00590488. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Dudel J. Relaxation after a voltage step of inhibitory synaptic current elicited by nerve stimulation (crayfish neuromuscular junction). Pflugers Arch. 1978 Sep 6;376(2):151–157. doi: 10.1007/BF00581578. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Dudel J. Voltage dependence of amplitude and time course of inhibitory synaptic current in crayfish muscle. Pflugers Arch. 1977 Oct 19;371(1-2):167–174. doi: 10.1007/BF00580786. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Faber D. S., Korn H. Single-shot channel activation accounts for duration of inhibitory postsynaptic potentials in a central neuron. Science. 1980 May 9;208(4444):612–615. doi: 10.1126/science.6245449. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Finger W., Stettmeier H. Efficacy of the two-microelectrode voltage clamp technique in crayfish muscle. Pflugers Arch. 1980 Sep;387(2):133–141. doi: 10.1007/BF00584264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Gardner D. Membrane-potential effects on an inhibitory post-synaptic conductance in Aplysia buccal ganglia. J Physiol. 1980 Jul;304:165–180. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1980.sp013317. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Gardner D., Stevens C. F. Rate-limiting step of inhibitory post-synaptic current decay in Aplysia buccal ganglia. J Physiol. 1980 Jul;304:145–164. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1980.sp013316. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Katz B., Miledi R. The statistical nature of the acetycholine potential and its molecular components. J Physiol. 1972 Aug;224(3):665–699. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1972.sp009918. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Kuba K., Nishi S. Characteristics of fast excitatory postsynaptic current in bullfrog sympathetic ganglion cells. Effects of membrane potential, temperature and Ca ions. Pflugers Arch. 1979 Jan 31;378(3):205–212. doi: 10.1007/BF00592737. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Lester H. A., Koblin D. D., Sheridan R. E. Role of voltage-sensitive receptors in nicotinic transmission. Biophys J. 1978 Mar;21(3):181–194. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(78)85518-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Lingle C., Auerbach A. Comparison of excitatory currents activated by different transmitters on crustacean muscle. II. Glutamate-activated currents and comparison with acetylcholine currents present on the same muscle. J Gen Physiol. 1983 Apr;81(4):571–588. doi: 10.1085/jgp.81.4.571. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Lingle C., Eisen J. S., Marder E. Block of glutamatergic excitatory synaptic channels by chlorisondamine. Mol Pharmacol. 1981 Mar;19(2):349–353. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. MacDermott A. B., Connor E. A., Dionne V. E., Parsons R. L. Voltage clamp study of fast excitatory synaptic currents in bullfrog sympathetic ganglion cells. J Gen Physiol. 1980 Jan;75(1):39–60. doi: 10.1085/jgp.75.1.39. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Magleby K. L., Stevens C. F. The effect of voltage on the time course of end-plate currents. J Physiol. 1972 May;223(1):151–171. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1972.sp009839. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Marder E. Cholinergic motor neurones in the stomatogastric system of the lobster. J Physiol. 1976 May;257(1):63–86. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1976.sp011356. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Marder E., Paupardin-Tritsch D. The pharmacological profile of the acetylcholine response of a crustacean muscle. J Exp Biol. 1980 Oct;88:147–159. doi: 10.1242/jeb.88.1.147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Michler A., Sakmann B. Receptor stability and channel conversion in the subsynaptic membrane of the developing mammalian neuromuscular junction. Dev Biol. 1980 Nov;80(1):1–17. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(80)90494-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Neher E., Sakmann B. Single-channel currents recorded from membrane of denervated frog muscle fibres. Nature. 1976 Apr 29;260(5554):799–802. doi: 10.1038/260799a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Nelson D. J., Sachs F. Single ionic channels observed in tissue-cultured muscle. Nature. 1979 Dec 20;282(5741):861–863. doi: 10.1038/282861a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Onodera K., Takeuchi A. Effects of membrane potential and temperature on the excitatory post-synaptic current in the crayfish muscle. J Physiol. 1978 Mar;276:183–192. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1978.sp012227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Onodera K., Takeuchi A. Ionic mechanism of the excitatory synaptic membrane of the crayfish neuromuscular junction. J Physiol. 1975 Oct;252(1):295–318. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1975.sp011145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Rang H. P. The characteristics of synaptic currents and responses to acetylcholine of rat submandibular ganglion cells. J Physiol. 1981 Feb;311:23–55. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1981.sp013571. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Schuetze S. M., Frank E. F., Fischbach G. D. Channel open time and metabolic stability of synaptic and extrasynaptic acetylcholine receptors on cultured chick myotubes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1978 Jan;75(1):520–523. doi: 10.1073/pnas.75.1.520. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Schuetze S. M. The acetylcholine channel open time in chick muscle is not decreased following innervation. J Physiol. 1980 Jun;303:111–124. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1980.sp013274. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of General Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES