Abstract
The magnitude of olfactory responses can be related to three primary variables [number of odorant molecules (N), sniff volume (V), and sniff duration (T)] and three derived variables [concentration (C = N/V), flow rate (F = V/T), and delivery rate (D = N/T)]. To evaluate the effects of these interdependent variables upon the olfactory response, the summated multiunit discharges were recorded from the olfactory nerves of nine frogs in response to octane presented at two levels (in 2:1 ratio) of each primary variable. This presentation defined eight "sniff" combinations representing three levels of each derived variable. In an ANOVA of the logs of the responses, the effect of each primary variable was highly significant, with no significant interactions. A multiplicative regression model incorporating the effects of the three primary variables represented responses exceedingly well, with positive effects of N and T and a negative effect of V. When, with this model, the effect of each of the derived variables was isolated from the effects of all other variables, the analysis showed a positive effect for C, a near-zero positive effect for D, and a negative effect for F. Placing certain constraints upon the model parameters generates 13 distinct one- and two-variable models (e.g., the [C, T] model requires N and V to have equal but opposite effects). In ranking these reduced models in terms of their ability to predict the neural response, the predictive ability of [F, N] and [C, T] was at least as good as that of the three-variable model.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (2.1 MB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- BEIDLER L. M. Properties of chemoreceptors of tongue of rat. J Neurophysiol. 1953 Nov;16(6):595–607. doi: 10.1152/jn.1953.16.6.595. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gesteland R. C., Lettvin J. Y., Pitts W. H. Chemical transmission in the nose of the frog. J Physiol. 1965 Dec;181(3):525–559. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1965.sp007781. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hornung D. E., Mozell M. M. Odorant removal from the frog olfactory mucosa. Brain Res. 1977 Jun 3;128(1):158–163. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(77)90244-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- JONES F. N. Subjective scales of intensity for the three odors. Am J Psychol. 1958 Jun;71(2):423–425. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- MOZELL M. M. EVIDENCE FOR SORPTION AS A MECHANISM OF THE OLFACTORY ANALYSIS OF VAPOURS. Nature. 1964 Sep 12;203:1181–1182. doi: 10.1038/2031181a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- MOZELL M. M. Olfactory mucosal and neural responses in the frog. Am J Physiol. 1962 Aug;203:353–358. doi: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1962.203.2.353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mackay-Sim A., Shaman P., Moulton D. G. Topographic coding of olfactory quality: odorant-specific patterns of epithelial responsivity in the salamander. J Neurophysiol. 1982 Aug;48(2):584–596. doi: 10.1152/jn.1982.48.2.584. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mozell M. M. Evidence for a chromatographic model of olfaction. J Gen Physiol. 1970 Jul;56(1):46–63. doi: 10.1085/jgp.56.1.46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mozell M. M. The spatiotemporal analysis of odorants at the level of the olfactory receptor sheet. J Gen Physiol. 1966 Sep;50(1):25–41. doi: 10.1085/jgp.50.1.25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rehn T. Perceived odor intensity as a function of air flow through the nose. Sens Processes. 1978 Sep;2(3):198–205. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schneider R. A., Schmidt C. E., Costiloe J. P. Relation of odor flow rate and duration to stimulus intensity needed for perception. J Appl Physiol. 1966 Jan;21(1):10–14. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1966.21.1.10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- TUCKER D. Physical variables in the olfactory stimulation process. J Gen Physiol. 1963 Jan;46:453–489. doi: 10.1085/jgp.46.3.453. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Teghtsoonian R., Teghtsoonian M., Berglund B., Berglund U. Invariance of odor strength with sniff vigor: an olfactory analogue to size constancy. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1978 Feb;4(1):144–152. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.4.1.144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]