Skip to main content
PMC home page
The Journal of General Physiology logoLink to The Journal of General Physiology
. 1980 Feb 1;75(2):207–232. doi: 10.1085/jgp.75.2.207

A covalently bound photoisomerizable agonist. Comparison with reversibly bound agonists at electrophorus electroplaques

HA Lester, ME Krouse, MM Nass, NH Wassermann, BF Erlanger
PMCID: PMC2215740  PMID: 6246192

Abstract

After disulphide bonds are reduced with dithiothreitol, trans-3- (α-bromomethyl)-3’-[α- (trimethylammonium)methyl]azobenzene (trans-QBr) alkylates a sulfhydryl group on receptors. The membrane conductance induced by this “tethered agonist” shares many properties with that induced by reversible agonists. Equilibrium conductance increases as the membrane potential is made more negative; the voltage sensitivity resembles that seen with 50 [mu]M carbachol. Voltage- jump relaxations follow an exponential time-course; the rate constants are about twice as large as those seen with 50 μM carbachol and have the same voltage and temperature sensitivity. With reversible agonists, the rate of channel opening increases with the frequency of agonist-receptor collisions: with tethered trans-Qbr, this rate depends only on intramolecular events. In comparison to the conductance induced by reversible agonists, the QBr-induced conductance is at least 10-fold less sensitive to competitive blockade by tubocurarine and roughly as sensitive to “open-channel blockade” bu QX-222. Light-flash experiments with tethered QBr resemble those with the reversible photoisomerizable agonist, 3,3’,bis-[α-(trimethylammonium)methyl]azobenzene (Bis-Q): the conductance is increased by cis {arrow} trans photoisomerizations and decreased by trans {arrow} cis photoisomerizations. As with Bis-Q, ligh-flash relaxations have the same rate constant as voltage-jump relaxations. Receptors with tethered trans isomer. By comparing the agonist-induced conductance with the cis/tans ratio, we conclude that each channel’s activation is determined by the configuration of a single tethered QBr molecule. The QBr-induced conductance shows slow decreases (time constant, several hundred milliseconds), which can be partially reversed by flashes. The similarities suggest that the same rate-limiting step governs the opening and closing of channels for both reversible and tethered agonists. Therefore, this step is probably not the initial encounter between agonist and receptor molecules.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.5 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Adams P. R. Voltage jump analysis of procaine action at frog end-plate. J Physiol. 1977 Jun;268(2):291–318. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1977.sp011858. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Anderson C. R., Stevens C. F. Voltage clamp analysis of acetylcholine produced end-plate current fluctuations at frog neuromuscular junction. J Physiol. 1973 Dec;235(3):655–691. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1973.sp010410. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bartels-Bernal E., Rosenberry T. L., Chang H. W. A membrane activation cycle induced by sulfhydryl reagents after affinity labeling of the acetylcholine receptor of electroplax. Mol Pharmacol. 1976 Sep;12(5):813–819. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bartels E., Wassermann N. H., Erlanger B. F. Photochromic activators of the acetylcholine receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1971 Aug;68(8):1820–1823. doi: 10.1073/pnas.68.8.1820. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Beam K. G. A quantitative description of end-plate currents in the presence of two lidocaine derivatives. J Physiol. 1976 Jun;258(2):301–322. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1976.sp011421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Beam K. G. A voltage-clamp study of the effect of two lidocaine derivatives on the time course of end-plate currents. J Physiol. 1976 Jun;258(2):279–300. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1976.sp011420. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Ben-Haim D., Dreyer F., Peper K. Acetylcholine receptor: modification of synaptic gating mechanism after treatment with a disulfide bond reducing agent. Pflugers Arch. 1975 Mar 22;355(1):19–26. doi: 10.1007/BF00584796. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Burgen A. S. The drug-receptor complex. J Pharm Pharmacol. 1966 Mar;18(3):137–149. doi: 10.1111/j.2042-7158.1966.tb07840.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. CLELAND W. W. DITHIOTHREITOL, A NEW PROTECTIVE REAGENT FOR SH GROUPS. Biochemistry. 1964 Apr;3:480–482. doi: 10.1021/bi00892a002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Chang H. W., Bock E. Molecular forms of acetylcholine receptor. Effects of calcium ions and a sulfhydryl reagent on the occurrence of oligomers. Biochemistry. 1977 Oct 4;16(20):4513–4520. doi: 10.1021/bi00639a028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Chang R. S., Potter L. T., Smith D. S. Postsynaptic membranes in the electric tissue of Narcine: IV. Isolation and characterization of the nicotinic receptor protein. Tissue Cell. 1977;9(4):623–644. doi: 10.1016/0040-8166(77)90031-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Cohen I., Van der Kloot W. Effects of [Ca2+] and [Mg2+] on the decay of miniature endplate currents. Nature. 1978 Jan 5;271(5640):77–79. doi: 10.1038/271077a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Colquhoun D., Dreyer F., Sheridan R. E. The actions of tubocurarine at the frog neuromuscular junction. J Physiol. 1979 Aug;293:247–284. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1979.sp012888. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. DEL CASTILLO J., KATZ B. Interaction at end-plate receptors between different choline derivatives. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1957 May 7;146(924):369–381. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1957.0018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Damle V. N., McLaughlin M., Karlin A. Bromoacetylcholine as an affinity label of the acetylcholine receptor from Torpedo californica. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1978 Oct 30;84(4):845–851. doi: 10.1016/0006-291x(78)91661-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Erlanger B. F. Photoregulation of biologically active macromolecules. Annu Rev Biochem. 1976;45:257–283. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.45.070176.001411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Fischbach G. D., Lass Y. A transition temperature for acetylcholine channel conductance in chick myoballs. J Physiol. 1978 Jul;280:527–536. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1978.sp012399. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Gage P. W., McBurney R. N. Effects of membrane potential, temperature and neostigmine on the conductance change caused by a quantum or acetylcholine at the toad neuromuscular junction. J Physiol. 1975 Jan;244(2):385–407. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1975.sp010805. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Hamilton S. L., McLaughlin M., Karlin A. Formation of disulfide-linked oligomers of acetylcholine receptor in membrane from torpedo electric tissue. Biochemistry. 1979 Jan 9;18(1):155–163. doi: 10.1021/bi00568a024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Heidmann T., Changeux J. P. Fast kinetic studies on the allosteric interactions between acetylcholine receptor and local anesthetic binding sites. Eur J Biochem. 1979 Feb 15;94(1):281–296. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1979.tb12894.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Hille B. Local anesthetics: hydrophilic and hydrophobic pathways for the drug-receptor reaction. J Gen Physiol. 1977 Apr;69(4):497–515. doi: 10.1085/jgp.69.4.497. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Jürss R., Prinz H., Maelicke A. NBD-5-acylcholine: fluorescent analog of acetylcholine and agonist at the neuromuscular junction. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1979 Mar;76(3):1064–1068. doi: 10.1073/pnas.76.3.1064. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Karlin A., Cowburn D. The affinity-labeling of partially purified acetylcholine receptor from electric tissue of Electrophorus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1973 Dec;70(12):3636–3640. doi: 10.1073/pnas.70.12.3636. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Karlin A. On the application of "a plausible model" of allosteric proteins to the receptor for acetylcholine. J Theor Biol. 1967 Aug;16(2):306–320. doi: 10.1016/0022-5193(67)90011-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Karlin A., Winnik M. Reduction and specific alkylation of the receptor for acetylcholine. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1968 Jun;60(2):668–674. doi: 10.1073/pnas.60.2.668. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Katz B., Miledi R. A re-examination of curare action at the motor endplate. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1978 Dec 4;203(1151):119–133. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1978.0096. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Koblin D. D., Lester H. A. Voltage-dependent and voltage-independent blockade of acetylcholine receptors by local anesthetics in Electrophorus electroplaques. Mol Pharmacol. 1979 May;15(3):559–580. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Kordas M. An attempt at an analysis of the factors determining the time course of the end-plate current. I. The effects of prostigmine and of the ratio of Mg 2+ to Ca 2+ . J Physiol. 1972 Jul;224(2):317–332. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1972.sp009897. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Kordas M. An attempt at an analysis of the factors determining the time course of the end-plate current. II. Temperature. J Physiol. 1972 Jul;224(2):333–348. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1972.sp009898. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Lester H. A. Analysis of sodium and potassium redistribution during sustained permeability increases at the innervated face of Electrophorus electroplaques. J Gen Physiol. 1978 Dec;72(6):847–862. doi: 10.1085/jgp.72.6.847. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Lester H. A., Chang H. W. Response of acetylcholine receptors to rapid photochemically produced increases in agonist concentration. Nature. 1977 Mar 24;266(5600):373–374. doi: 10.1038/266373a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Lester H. A., Changeux J. P., Sheridan R. E. Conductance increases produced by bath application of cholinergic agonists to Electrophorus electroplaques. J Gen Physiol. 1975 Jun;65(6):797–816. doi: 10.1085/jgp.65.6.797. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Lester H. A., Krouse M. E., Nass M. M., Wassermann N. H., Erlanger B. F. Light-activated drug confirms a mechanism of ion channel blockade. Nature. 1979 Aug 9;280(5722):509–510. doi: 10.1038/280509a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Magleby K. L., Stevens C. F. A quantitative description of end-plate currents. J Physiol. 1972 May;223(1):173–197. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1972.sp009840. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Magleby K. L., Stevens C. F. The effect of voltage on the time course of end-plate currents. J Physiol. 1972 May;223(1):151–171. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1972.sp009839. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Marty A. Noise and relaxation studies of acetylcholine induced currents in the presence of procaine. J Physiol. 1978 May;278:237–250. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1978.sp012301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Moore H. P., Raftery M. A. Studies of reversible and irreversible interactions of an alkylating agonist with Torpedo californica acetylcholine receptor in membrane-bound and purified states. Biochemistry. 1979 May 15;18(10):1862–1867. doi: 10.1021/bi00577a003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Nass M. M., Lester H. A., Krouse M. E. Response of acetylcholine receptors to photoisomerizations of bound agonist molecules. Biophys J. 1978 Oct;24(1):135–160. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(78)85352-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Neher E., Sakmann B., Steinbach J. H. The extracellular patch clamp: a method for resolving currents through individual open channels in biological membranes. Pflugers Arch. 1978 Jul 18;375(2):219–228. doi: 10.1007/BF00584247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Neher E., Sakmann B. Voltage-dependence of drug-induced conductance in frog neuromuscular junction. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1975 Jun;72(6):2140–2144. doi: 10.1073/pnas.72.6.2140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Neher E., Steinbach J. H. Local anaesthetics transiently block currents through single acetylcholine-receptor channels. J Physiol. 1978 Apr;277:153–176. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1978.sp012267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Podleski T., Meunier J. C., Changeux J. P. Compared effects of dithiotreitol on the interaction of an affinity-labeling reagent with acetylcholinesterase and the excitable membrane of the electroplax. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1969 Aug;63(4):1239–1246. doi: 10.1073/pnas.63.4.1239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Raftery M. A., Vandlen R. L., Reed K. L., Lee T. Characterization of Torpedo californica acetylcholine receptor: its subunit composition and ligand-binding properties. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1976;40:193–202. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1976.040.01.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Rang H. P., Ritter J. M. The effect of disulfide bond reduction on the properties of cholinergic receptors in chick muscle. Mol Pharmacol. 1971 Nov;7(6):620–631. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Reynolds J. A., Karlin A. Molecular weight in detergent solution of acetylcholine receptor from Torpedo californica. Biochemistry. 1978 May 30;17(11):2035–2038. doi: 10.1021/bi00604a001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Rosenberry T. L., Neumann E. Interaction of ligands with acetylcholinesterase. Use of temperature-jump relaxation kinetics in the binding of specific fluorescent ligands. Biochemistry. 1977 Aug 23;16(17):3870–3878. doi: 10.1021/bi00636a024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Ruff R. L. A quantitative analysis of local anaesthetic alteration of miniature end-plate currents and end-plate current fluctuations. J Physiol. 1977 Jan;264(1):89–124. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1977.sp011659. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Sheridan R. E., Lester H. A. Rates and equilibria at the acetylcholine receptor of Electrophorus electroplaques: a study of neurally evoked postsynaptic currents and of voltage-jump relaxations. J Gen Physiol. 1977 Aug;70(2):187–219. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Sheridan R. E., Lester H. A. Relaxation measurements on the acetylcholine receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1975 Sep;72(9):3496–3500. doi: 10.1073/pnas.72.9.3496. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Silman I., Karlin A. Acetylcholine receptor: covalent attachment of depolarizing groups at the active site. Science. 1969 Jun 20;164(3886):1420–1421. doi: 10.1126/science.164.3886.1420. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Suarez-Isla B. A., Hucho F. Acetylcholine receptor: SH group reactivity as indicator of conformational changes and functional states. FEBS Lett. 1977 Mar 15;75(1):65–69. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(77)80054-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Van der Kloot W. G., Cohen I. Membrane surface potential changes may alter drug interactions: an example, acetylcholine and curare. Science. 1979 Mar 30;203(4387):1351–1352. doi: 10.1126/science.424757. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Wassermann N. H., Bartels E., Erlanger B. F. Conformational properties of the acetylcholine receptor as revealed by studies with constrained depolarizing ligands. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1979 Jan;76(1):256–259. doi: 10.1073/pnas.76.1.256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Witzemann V., Raftery M. Specific molecular aggregates or Torpedo californica acetylcholine receptor. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1978 Apr 14;81(3):1025–1031. doi: 10.1016/0006-291x(78)91453-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of General Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES